OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Russell Hobbs 24600-56 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:?Cordless:noWeight:1.3 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Russell Hobbs 24600-56 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

65%

6.2

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 62% of immersion blenders
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 55%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.7

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 63%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Russell Hobbs 24600-56

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.7

Dimensions

6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.7
Power
?
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
24,600 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 24,600 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 99.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.3 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.3 kg, which is heavier in hand than 60.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Height
28.4 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 28.4 cm in height, which is more compact than 92.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Russell Hobbs 24600-56 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 10,100 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (24,600 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    24,600 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 11.6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (28.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    28.4 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs 24600-56 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 80% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs 24600-56 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 10,100 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (24,600 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    24,600 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 11.6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (28.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    28.4 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.4% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 24600-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.69 vs 7.7).
    7.69 vs 7.73
  • 0.4% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 24600-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.69 vs 7.7).
    7.69 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Russell Hobbs 24600-56

  • Good value for money as an entry-level, budget-friendly kitchen appliance
  • Compact 2-in-1 design saves kitchen counter and storage space
  • Simple to operate with straightforward two-speed control options
  • Detachable blending foot makes it easy to clean after use
  • Includes a practical grinding container with its own stainless steel blade

What customers don't like about Russell Hobbs 24600-56

  • Relatively low motor power at 200W, which may struggle with very tough ingredients
  • The blending leg base is made of plastic, which can stain or warp when used frequently in hot soups
  • Limited speed settings with only two basic speeds and no variable speed trigger
  • The 500 ml grinding/chopping container capacity is quite small and not ideal for large households or big batches

Verdict

The Russell Hobbs 24600-56 My Food 2-in-1 Hand Blender is a compact, white multi-functional appliance operating on a modest 200W to 250W motor with 2 speed settings. Its primary characteristics include high-quality stainless steel blades, a 1.2-meter power cable, and a 500ml chopper bowl designed for grinding and chopping ingredients like bolognese or blending dips. The main pros of this model are its space-saving design, quiet operation, and the inclusion of a dishwasher-safe, easy-to-clean detachable plastic blending leg and chopper container. On the downside, its low-wattage motor is not suitable for heavy-duty tasks like crushing ice or hard nuts, and the plastic composition of the blending wand makes it prone to food discoloration and less ideal for high-temperature liquids compared to stainless steel alternatives.

Compare Russell Hobbs 24600-56 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Russell Hobbs 24600-56 and other immersion blenders

No results found