OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Kenwood HDP100WG Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:600 WCordless:noWeight:0.75 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Kenwood HDP100WG Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Kenwood HDP100WG
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

65%

5.9

Technical score

25%

9.3

User score

10%

8.3

List score

▼Worse than 55% of immersion blenders
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

▲Better than 51%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

5.1

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

▼Worse than 71%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models

70%

9.2

Rating

30%

9.4

Popularity

★Better than 91%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
★Better than 90%
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
  • kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
kenwood-hdp100wg
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Kenwood HDP100WG

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

5.1

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

5.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.8
Power
600 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
11,200 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 11,200 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 89.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.1 m, which is shorter reach than 77.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.3% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.75 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.75 kg, which is lighter in hand than 87.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
35.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 35.5 cm in height, which is more compact than 82.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Kenwood HDP100WG vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 31.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.75 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 4.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 17.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    9.2

    Rating

    30%

    9.4

    Popularity

    9.3 vs 7.9
  • 80% cheaper
    Kenwood HDP100WG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 17.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    9.2

    Rating

    30%

    9.4

    Popularity

    9.3 vs 7.9
  • 80% cheaper
    Kenwood HDP100WG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 31.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.75 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 4.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 3,300 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,200 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,200 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 3,300 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,200 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,200 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kenwood HDP100WG

  • Efficient blending performance thanks to the patented Triblade triple-blade system
  • Effective anti-splash foot design that prevents kitchen mess during use
  • Lightweight build and comfortable, textured anti-slip handle grip
  • Easy to clean with a detachable blending leg that is dishwasher safe
  • Simple assembly with a quick-release bayonet attachment system
  • Turbo boost function provides immediate extra power when tackling thicker mixtures

What customers don't like about Kenwood HDP100WG

  • Limited fine texture control due to having only one standard speed setting plus turbo
  • The blending leg wand is made of plastic rather than more durable stainless steel
  • Not built for heavy daily commercial use or processing highly dense, tough ingredients

Verdict

The Kenwood HDP100WG is a lightweight 0.75 kg immersion blender featuring a 600W motor, a single speed setting plus a dedicated turbo pulse button, and a durable plastic Triblade wand measuring 7.3 x 7.3 x 35.5 cm. Main characteristics and pros include its patented anti-splash Triblade system with three stainless steel angled blades that maximize cutting action, a secure bayonet fit for easy assembly, and a comfortable textured non-slip grip handle. However, its downsides include limited precise speed control due to having only one operational speed setting, and a plastic blending wand construction that is less robust against staining and high heat compared to stainless steel alternatives.

Compare Kenwood HDP100WG with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kenwood HDP100WG and other immersion blenders

No results found