OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Rock Jaw Kommand Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Rock Jaw Kommand Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Rock Jaw Kommand
5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical score

20%

6.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 89% of headphones
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

52%

5.6

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.1

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

7.2

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 84%
6.0

User score

User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 97%
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
  • rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
rock-jaw-kommand
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Rock Jaw Kommand

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

52%

5.6

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.1

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

7.2

Calls & Controls

5.3
User score
User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.0
Popularity
Popularity
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Popularity:
Rock Jaw Kommand has a popularity score of 4.2 points, which is lower than that of 64.6% of products in this category.
4.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

6.8
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
hybrid
Driver size
8 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 8 mm, smaller driver size than 96.1% of headphones and equal to 1.7% of headphones.
Number of drivers
2
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 2 drivers, more drivers than 96% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Rock
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
32 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 32 g, lighter than 82.3% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

Rock Jaw Kommand vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 85.3% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (32 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    32 g vs 218 g
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • 12 dB higher max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (122 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    122 dB vs 110 dB
  • 85.3% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (32 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    32 g vs 218 g
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • 12 dB higher max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (122 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    122 dB vs 110 dB
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • 32 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (8 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    8 mm vs 40 mm
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 32.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rock Jaw Kommand
    the average pair of headphones
    Rock Jaw Kommand has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.02 vs 8).
    6.02 vs 8
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 6.9% worse value for money
    Rock Jaw Kommand has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.8 vs 7.3).
    6.8 vs 7.27
  • 32.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rock Jaw Kommand
    the average pair of headphones
    Rock Jaw Kommand has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.02 vs 8).
    6.02 vs 8
  • 6.9% worse value for money
    Rock Jaw Kommand has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.8 vs 7.3).
    6.8 vs 7.27
  • 39.4% less popular
    Rock Jaw Kommand is less popular than the average pair of headphones (4.21 vs 5.9).
    4.21 vs 5.87
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 32 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (8 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    8 mm vs 40 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techadvisor.com
27/05/2015
Hands-on review · Hybrid in-ears
Verdict
The Rock Jaw Kommand is a clear step up from cheaper rivals, with detailed sound and swappable filters, though its ear hooks may not suit everyone.
androidheadlines.com
11/08/2015
Hands-on review · Hybrid in-ears
Verdict
The Rock Jaw Kommand is a detailed, wide-sounding set with excellent value, though its hook design takes getting used to and it has no hard case.
K
kopfhoerer.de
06/07/2018
Summary of the review
Rock Jaw Audio Resonate review at kopfhoerer.de
(Translated)Show original
techadvisor.com
27/05/2015
Hands-on review · Hybrid in-ears
Verdict
The Rock Jaw Kommand is a clear step up from cheaper rivals, with detailed sound and swappable filters, though its ear hooks may not suit everyone.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Rock Jaw Kommand

  • Hybrid driver configuration (balanced armature and 8mm dynamic) providing high clarity and detail
  • Customizable sound signature via three interchangeable tuning filters (Silver for bass, Gold for treble/neutral, Black for balanced)
  • Wide and open soundstage with good instrumental separation
  • Premium aesthetic featuring a combination of ebony wood and metal
  • Excellent value for money, often described as punchy and detailed beyond its price point
  • Low impedance makes them easy to drive directly from smartphones without extra amplification

What customers don't like about Rock Jaw Kommand

  • Polarizing ear-hook design that many find awkward, uncomfortable, or difficult to fit properly
  • Stock silicone ear tips are frequently criticized for poor fit and difficulty achieving an acoustic seal
  • Interchangeable filters can occasionally come loose or unscrew during use
  • Reported build quality issues, including channel failure and non-functional units upon arrival
  • Microphonic cable noise (cable noise transmitted when moving)
  • Lack of a hard carrying case; only a soft pouch is typically included

Verdict

The Rock Jaw Kommand is a flagship hybrid in-ear monitor (IEM) featuring a dual-driver configuration that combines an 8mm dynamic driver for punchy lows with a balanced armature for detailed high frequencies. These headphones are housed in a premium ebony wood and aluminum acoustic chamber and offer a customizable listening experience through three interchangeable tuning filters—Silver (bass), Champagne (neutral), and Black (reference). Technically, they deliver a frequency response of 20Hz–20,000Hz with a 16-ohm impedance and 110dB sensitivity, supported by a 1.2m twisted tangle-resistant cable with an inline microphone. Main pros include their exceptional detail, versatile sound signatures, and futuristic design with adjustable rotating ear hooks. However, some users find the ear hooks uncomfortable, and the included silicone tips may lack a perfect fit for all ears, occasionally requiring aftermarket foam replacements.

Compare Rock Jaw Kommand with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Rock Jaw Kommand and other products in the Headphones category

No results found