Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Philips Fidelio X2hr Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Philips Fidelio X2hr Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Philips Fidelio X2hr
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.4

Technical score

20%

9.4

User score

â–²Better than 51% of headphones
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 51%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

5.9

Sound

20%

5.0

Features

10%

5.6

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.0

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 79%
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 99%
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
  • philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
philips-fidelio-x2hr
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Headphones model ranking

Ranked #1 of 1,029 models in Headphones (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Philips Fidelio X2hr

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

5.9

Sound

20%

5.0

Features

10%

5.6

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.0

Calls & Controls

5.4
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Philips Fidelio X2hr has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.3
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 50 mm, larger driver size than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 8.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
no
This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while 15.1% is. 84.9% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
yes
This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode. 75.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Philips
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
380 g
This pair of headphones weighs 380 g, heavier than 93.7% of headphones and equal to 0.4% of headphones.
Acoustic design
open-back
Clamp force
3.2
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 3.2, lower clamp force than 75.1% of headphones and equal to 1.4% of headphones.
Show more

Philips Fidelio X2hr vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • Ambient sound mode
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • Sidetone support
    This pair of headphones supports sidetone, the average pair of headphones does not. 25.3% of headphones support sidetone.
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Philips Fidelio X2hr
    the average pair of headphones
    Philips Fidelio X2hr has a higher user score than the average pair of headphones (9.44 vs 8).
    9.44 vs 8
  • 70.4% more popular
    Philips Fidelio X2hr is more popular than the average pair of headphones (10 vs 5.9).
    10 vs 5.87
  • 1.8 m longer cable length
    This pair of headphones offers a more useful cable length than the average pair of headphones (3 m vs 1.2 m). The average headphones have a cable length of 1.2 m.
    3 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1.1 lower clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a lower clamp force than the average pair of headphones (3.2 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    3.2 vs 4.3
  • 11 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    55 mm vs 44 mm
  • Open-back design
    This pair of headphones uses an open-back design, while the average pair of headphones does not. 9.1% of headphones have an open-back design.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 13 dB higher max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (123 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    123 dB vs 110 dB
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • Sidetone support
    This pair of headphones supports sidetone, the average pair of headphones does not. 25.3% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Ambient sound mode
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 74.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (380 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    380 g vs 218 g
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No travel bag
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 74.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (380 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    380 g vs 218 g
  • No travel bag
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Metal Epidemic
✓ explicit
01/10/2025
Hands-on review · listening tests across genres and comfort
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR has excellent sound across genres and great value for money, making it a strong plug-and-play pick.
7.0
Ken Creates
≈ estimated
20/04/2024
Full review · bass, sound tests and gaming use
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is a bass-focused open-back headphone for bassheads and gamers, with clear trade-offs in mids and detail.
8.0
Custom Cans
≈ estimated
20/12/2023
Initial look · design, socket and sound impressions
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is good value with a decent soundstage, though the bass and modding potential are limited.
8.0
chuckolatte
≈ estimated
18/12/2020
Hands-on review · sound tests, gaming and mic setup
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR offers clear, lively V-shaped sound at a fair price, though harsh treble needs EQ.
9.0
OllieBeanz
≈ estimated
08/09/2020
Hands-on review · comfort, sound and build
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is comfortable, with a great soundstage and strong value, ideal for gaming.
4.0
the Honest Audiophile
≈ estimated
26/11/2019
Long-term test · several months of daily use
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR disappoints on fit and sound; good for gaming, but not recommended for music.
8.0
Joshua Valour
≈ estimated
14/10/2019
Purchased review · sound signature and comparisons
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is limited, but a great purchase for bass lovers who want that specific sound.
9.5
BadSeed Tech
≈ estimated
15/09/2019
Hands-on review · sound, gaming and comparison tests
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is clearly recommended for both music and gaming.
9.0
Play 32-bit
≈ estimated
22/08/2020
Comparison review · sound and build impressions
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is an excellent choice in its price range, though the other model is preferred if you can only pick one.
7.0
Zadius Tech
≈ estimated
05/09/2018
Hands-on review · gaming test with mic and music listening
Verdict
Philips Fidelio X2HR is best for gaming with a mic added, but not recommended for mainly listening to music.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
12/05/2020
Summary of the review
W
worldbolding.com
15/01/2021
Summary of the review
A
audiosciencereview.com
10/01/2021
Summary of the review
P
positive-feedback.com
01/01/2020
Summary of the review
E
earmass.wordpress.com
17/01/2020
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
12/05/2024
Summary of the review
D
diyaudioheaven.wordpress.com
14/11/2019
Summary of the review
P
pragmaticaudio.com
12/05/2024
Summary of the review
A
audiostance.com
01/11/2022
Summary of the review
S
switchandclick.com
26/10/2020
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
15/07/2016
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
19/02/2015
Summary of the review
H
hifitest.de
31/12/2014
Summary of the review
A
audiovision.de
25/11/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
04/09/2024
Summary of the review
V
vintage-audio-laser.fr
21/06/2023
Summary of the review
G
gouforit.com
13/01/2026
Summary of the review
M
misauriculares.com
05/09/2018
Summary of the review
M
misauriculares.com
03/09/2018
Summary of the review
H
hifi.nl
06/01/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Philips Fidelio X2hr

  • Exceptional soundstage width providing an immersive, speaker-like experience
  • Robust and premium build quality featuring metal and leather materials
  • High level of comfort for long sessions due to velour memory foam ear pads
  • Excellent value for money, frequently available at significant discounts
  • Easy to drive without a dedicated amplifier thanks to low impedance
  • Detachable 3-meter braided cable allows for easy replacement

What customers don't like about Philips Fidelio X2hr

  • Inconsistent treble response with peaks that can cause sibilance or harshness
  • Noticeable sound leakage due to the open-back design, making them unsuitable for public use
  • Heavier than many competitors (approx. 380g), which can lead to fatigue for some users
  • Lack of sub-bass extension, common for open-back models
  • Bulky design that limits portability and is not recommended for sports
  • Issues with channel imbalance reported by some users due to quality control variation

Verdict

The Philips Fidelio X2HR is a premium open-back headphone featuring 50mm high-definition neodymium drivers with a Layered Motion Control (LMC) diaphragm and an expansive frequency response of 5Hz to 40kHz. With a low impedance of 30 ohms and a sensitivity of 100 dB, these headphones are remarkably easy to drive without a dedicated amplifier, offering a warm, well-balanced sound profile with punchy bass and a natural soundstage. Main pros include its durable build using genuine leather and metal, high-resolution audio certification, and superior comfort provided by breathable velour memory foam ear pads and a self-adjusting hammock headband. However, notable cons include significant sound leakage due to the open-back design, a bulky and non-foldable frame that limits portability, and an excessively long 3-metre cable that can be cumbersome for casual use.

Compare Philips Fidelio X2hr with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Philips Fidelio X2hr and other products in the Headphones category

No results found