OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Monster Octagon Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Monster Octagon Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Monster Octagon
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of headphones
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

52%

6.4

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

8.6

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

7.8

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 52%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 89%
  • monster-octagon
monster-octagon
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Monster Octagon

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

52%

6.4

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

8.6

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

7.8

Calls & Controls

5.9
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Popularity:
Monster Octagon has a popularity score of 4.1 points, which is lower than that of 65.2% of products in this category.
4.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Monster
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
120 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 120 g, lighter than 75.6% of headphones and equal to 0.8% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Monster Octagon vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Spatial audio support
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 45% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (120 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    120 g vs 218 g
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • 45% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (120 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    120 g vs 218 g
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • Spatial audio support
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 17.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Monster Octagon
    the average pair of headphones
    Monster Octagon has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.82 vs 8).
    6.82 vs 8
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 2.78x more expensive
    Monster Octagon is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£250 vs £90).
    £250 vs £90
  • 3.9% worse value for money
    Monster Octagon has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7 vs 7.3).
    7 vs 7.27
  • 44.3% less popular
    Monster Octagon is less popular than the average pair of headphones (4.07 vs 5.9).
    4.07 vs 5.87
  • 17.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Monster Octagon
    the average pair of headphones
    Monster Octagon has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.82 vs 8).
    6.82 vs 8
  • 2.78x more expensive
    Monster Octagon is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£250 vs £90).
    £250 vs £90
  • 3.9% worse value for money
    Monster Octagon has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7 vs 7.3).
    7 vs 7.27
  • 44.3% less popular
    Monster Octagon is less popular than the average pair of headphones (4.07 vs 5.9).
    4.07 vs 5.87
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
SAGE Sound & Gadgets
≈ estimated
02/04/2020
Hands-on review · sound tests, build and accessories
Verdict
Monster Octagon is not perfect but sounds very good, though it is overpriced at retail and better when much cheaper.
8.0
RANDOM JAGUAR
≈ estimated
15/01/2016
Hands-on review · bass, volume and comfort tests
Verdict
Monster Octagon offers strong bass and comfort for gym use, though opinion on its price is mixed.
Not graded
Not graded
Brand video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
headphoneslab.com
07/09/2015
Summary of the review
Monster Octagon Official UFC Over-Ear Headphones Review
futurefive.co.nz
03/10/2014
Hands-on review · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Monster Octagon is a solid, bass-rich pair with cushioned cups that block most surrounding noise, suiting Beats fans, but it won't rival high-end headphones.
military.com
01/05/2014
Brief review · UFC-branded headphones
Verdict
The Monster Octagon is a well-built, bass-heavy pair for Beats fans who love UFC, but it's a poor fit if heavy bass bothers you.
kopfhoerer.de
05/02/2015
Hands-on test · DJ headphones
Verdict
The Monster Octagon is a bold, sturdy DJ-style headphone with punchy bass and a comfortable fit, but it runs warm and other brands offer similar build for less.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Monster Octagon

  • Punchy and well-articulated bass that is deep but doesn't overpower mid-ranges
  • High build quality with a premium matte finish that resists fingerprints
  • Soft leather ear cushions with a comfortable over-ear fit for sitting or light activity
  • Unique DJ-style swiveling ear cups for easy communication
  • Excellent passive noise isolation with minimal sound leakage
  • Comes with multiple heavy-duty, tangle-free cables (coiled and ControlTalk with mic)

What customers don't like about Monster Octagon

  • Can feel heavy and tight on the head after more than an hour of continuous use
  • High frequencies lack some clarity and instrument separation compared to high-end models
  • Ears may get hot during intense physical activities or long runs
  • Included storage bag is soft fabric and offers limited protection
  • The ControlTalk Universal cable may not offer full control features for iOS devices

Verdict

The Monster Octagon over-ear headphones are a durable, UFC-branded wired headset featuring 40mm dynamic drivers, a 32-ohm impedance, and a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz. Key characteristics include DJ-style swiveling ear cups with lush leather cushions, a matte finish in black or red, and Pure Monster Sound technology designed for deep, punchy bass and clear articulation. Pros include exceptional passive noise isolation, high-quality build materials like heavy-duty gold-plated cables, and a comfortable fit for long-duration sitting. However, potential cons involve a lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), some weightiness that can cause fatigue after an hour of use, and a slight lack of clarity or instrument separation in the higher frequencies.

Compare Monster Octagon with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Monster Octagon and other products in the Headphones category

No results found