OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT Review | 93 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£25
  • Form factor: on-ear
  • Connectivity: wireless
  • Battery life: 40 hours
  • Active noise cancellation (ANC): no

JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT review. Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among headphones and if it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

4.6

Technical Score

20.0%

?

User score

Poor
4.6

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

4.5

Sound

20.0%

2.7

Features

10.0%

6.2

Design

8.0%

5.3

Connectivity

6.0%

7.7

Battery

4.0%

5.2

Calls & Controls

Poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 6.0
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    9.0

    Audio latency

    25.0%

    1.0

    Low-latency game mode

    20.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    12.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    8.0%

    6.5

    Battery life

  • 4.6
    Travel

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Active noise cancellation (ANC)

    24.0%

    6.5

    Battery life

    18.0%

    6.6

    Weight

    16.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    14.0%

    0.0

    Ambient sound mode

  • 5.7
    Calls

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    24.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    18.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    16.0%

    6.5

    Battery life

    14.0%

    1.0

    Companion app

  • 5.1
    Workout

    Score components:

    28.0%

    6.6

    Weight

    24.0%

    1.0

    Water resistance

    20.0%

    4.0

    IP rating

    16.0%

    6.5

    Battery life

    12.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £25

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The JBL Tune 520BT is the upgraded successor to the Tune 510BT, significantly boosting battery life from 40 hours to up to 57 hours and updating connectivity from Bluetooth 5.0 to 5.3. Both wireless on-ear models feature 32mm–33mm dynamic drivers with JBL Pure Bass sound, multi-point connection for switching between two devices, and a lightweight, foldable design weighing approximately 160g. While the 510BT remains a budget staple with a slightly better-performing microphone, the 520BT introduces support for the JBL Headphones App, allowing for custom EQ settings and faster quick-charging (3 hours of playback from 5 minutes of charging versus 2 hours on the 510BT). Main pros include exceptional battery endurance, stable multi-device pairing, and portable ergonomics, but both suffer from a lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), poor passive isolation in noisy environments, and a potentially tight on-ear fit that can become uncomfortable during long listening sessions.

Technical Specifications of JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

?

Sound

20.0%

?

Features

10.0%

?

Design

8.0%

?

Connectivity

6.0%

?

Battery

4.0%

?

Calls & Controls

4.6
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a technical score of 4.57 points, which is lower than that of 68.3% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 72.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

4.6

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

6.2
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a quality-to-price ratio of 6.2 points, which is lower than 74.9% of products in this category.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

Importance: HIGH

no
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not support active noise cancellation. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
What it is: Type of speaker driver technology used
When it matters: When the underlying sound character and driver technology matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

dynamic
Driver size
What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

Importance: MEDIUM

32 mm
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses a driver size of 32 mm, smaller driver size than 74.5% of headphones and equal to 3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
What it is: Total number of speaker drivers per earcup
When it matters: When multi-driver designs are part of your buying criteria.

Importance: LOW

1
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses 1 drivers, equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=10 Hz

20 Hz
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.6% of headphones and equal to 47.5% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
What it is: Shows whether the headphones can handle voice chat and calls in addition to normal audio playback.
When it matters: When one pair needs to cover music, calls, meetings, and gaming chat.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is headset-ready, 84.7% is not. 15.3% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=2

1
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has 1 microphones, more microphones than 25.9% of headphones and equal to 52.2% of headphones.
Boom microphone
What it is: Includes detachable boom microphone for voice clarity
When it matters: When you need stronger voice clarity for gaming, streaming, or work calls.

Importance: LOW

no
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not include a boom microphone. 15.6% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
What it is: Signal-to-noise ratio of the microphone
When it matters: When call clarity matters and you want your voice picked up more cleanly instead of buried in background hiss.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >80 dB

?
Show more
Connectivity
What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

Importance: HIGH

wireless
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 52.6% of headphones and equal to 47.4% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth technology supported
When it matters: When wireless stability, efficiency, and feature support matter more than treating Bluetooth as a box-check spec.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5.0

5.0
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses Bluetooth version 5.0, newer Bluetooth version than 70.9% of headphones and equal to 13% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: Maximum wireless operating distance from source device
When it matters: When you move around rooms and want fewer dropouts from your source device.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

10 m
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.6% of headphones and equal to 79.9% of headphones.
Audio latency
What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <60 ms

?
Multipoint support
What it is: Supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices
When it matters: When you switch often between a phone and a laptop during the day.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT supports multipoint. 35% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
What it is: Allows external sounds to pass through for awareness
When it matters: When you need to stay aware of traffic, voices, or announcements.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A
EQ support
What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not support EQ customization. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
What it is: Dedicated mobile app for customization and updates
When it matters: When software customization, updates, and extra controls matter.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not work with a companion app. 44.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
What it is: Allows adjustment of noise cancellation intensity levels
When it matters: When you move between quiet rooms, offices, streets, and public transport and do not want one ANC setting for every situation.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4

N/A
Voice assistant support
What it is: Compatible with voice assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant
When it matters: When hands-free control is part of your daily routine.

Importance: LOW

yes
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Playback time on a single charge
When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >45 hours

40 hours
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT offers battery life of 40 hours, higher battery life than 62.5% of headphones and equal to 4.8% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >40 hours

N/A
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=2 hours

2 hours
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 48.5% of headphones and equal to 39.1% of headphones.
Quick charge
What it is: Provides quick playback time with short charging period
When it matters: When a short top-up needs to deliver useful playback before you leave.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT supports quick charge. 31% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=720 mAh

450 mAh
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a battery capacity of 450 mAh, lower battery capacity than 65.9% of headphones and equal to 2.3% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

JBL
Form factor
What it is: Overall design type of the headphones (over-ear, on-ear, in-ear, etc.)
When it matters: When comfort, portability, and isolation depend on the overall headphone style.

Importance: HIGH

on-ear
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the headphones
When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <150 g

160 g
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT weighs 160 g, lighter than 67% of headphones and equal to 0.9% of headphones.
Acoustic design
What it is: Type of acoustic design (open-back, closed-back, semi-open)
When it matters: When you need the right balance of isolation, leakage, and soundstage.

Importance: HIGH

closed-back
Clamp force
What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

Importance: MEDIUM

5.8
JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a clamp force of 5.8, higher clamp force than 82.1% of headphones and equal to 5.7% of headphones.
Show more

JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT vs the average headphone

  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
    When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.wireless vs wired
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
    What it is: Physical controls available directly on headphones
    When it matters: When you need playback, volume, or call controls to be easy to reach without pulling out your phone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 26.6% lower weight
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is lighter than the average headphone (160 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    What it is: Total weight of the headphones
    When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <150 g

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is lighter than the average headphone (160 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.160 g vs 218 g
  • Foldable design
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a foldable design, the average headphone does not. 61% of headphones are foldable.
    What it is: Earcups or headband can fold for compact storage
    When it matters: When you travel often and want easier storage in a bag.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a foldable design, the average headphone does not. 61% of headphones are foldable.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
    What it is: Uses USB-C connector for charging or data
    When it matters: When you want to charge with the same cable family used by your phone, tablet, laptop, or other daily devices.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Quick mic mute
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.
    What it is: Ability to mute microphone during calls
    When it matters: When you need to silence the mic quickly during meetings or multiplayer games.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    What it is: Playback time on a single charge
    When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >45 hours

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.40 hours vs 30 hours
  • 3.6x cheaper
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is cheaper than the average headphone (£25 vs £90).
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is cheaper than the average headphone (£25 vs £90).£25 vs £90
  • 26.6% lower weight
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is lighter than the average headphone (160 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
  • Foldable design
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a foldable design, the average headphone does not. 61% of headphones are foldable.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
  • Rechargeable battery
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a rechargeable battery, the average headphone does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Quick mic mute
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.

Total
Overall
Design
Battery
Connectivity
Calls & Controls
  • Fixed cable
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a fixed cable, while the average headphone has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 28 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (32 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
  • 1.5 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
  • 11 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 8 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (32 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
  • No neodymium magnet
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT does not use neodymium magnets, the average headphone does. 77.4% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 15 dB lower max SPL
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a lower max SPL than the average headphone (95 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
  • 25% lower battery capacity
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a lower battery capacity than the average headphone (450 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
  • 8 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (32 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
    When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (32 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.32 mm vs 40 mm
  • Fixed cable
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a fixed cable, while the average headphone has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
    What it is: Cable can be removed or replaced
    When it matters: When you care about easier cable replacement, simpler storage, or the option to swap to shorter, longer, or upgraded leads.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a fixed cable, while the average headphone has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 28 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (32 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    What it is: Internal height of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When larger ears need enough space inside the earcups.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (32 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.32 mm vs 60 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
    When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=10 Hz

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 1.5 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
    When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.5.8 vs 4.3
  • 11 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
    What it is: Internal width of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When earcup fit affects comfort and pressure around your ears.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.32 mm vs 43 mm
  • 4.65x less popular
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).1 vs 4.65
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
    What it is: Cable designed to resist tangling
    When it matters: When you often carry wired headphones in a bag or pocket.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
Total
Overall
Design
Sound
Battery

Graphic comparison of JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT?

  • Exceptional battery life (up to 40 hours on 510BT and 57 hours on 520BT)
  • Affordable price point with great overall value for budget buyers
  • Lightweight and foldable design makes them highly portable
  • Quick charging feature (e.g., 5 mins for 2-3 hours of playback)
  • Support for multi-point connection to two devices simultaneously
  • JBL Pure Bass provides a punchy sound profile popular for modern music
  • JBL Headphones App support (520BT only) allows for EQ customization

What customers dislike about JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT?

  • On-ear design can cause ear fatigue and discomfort during long sessions
  • Lack of Active Noise Cancellation (ANC); poor at blocking background noise
  • All-plastic construction can feel somewhat cheap and less durable
  • Noticeable audio leakage at higher volumes which may annoy others
  • Microphone quality struggles in loud environments or windy conditions
  • Aggressive clamping force may feel too tight for users with larger heads
  • No 3.5mm wired backup option; strictly Bluetooth use

Expert reviews

T
techgadgetscanada.com
15/07/2024
JBL TUNE 520BT on-ear headphones review - Tech Gadgets Canada

The JBL Tune 520BT is an affordable, entry-level set of wireless on-ear headphones priced at $50 USD. As a direct successor to the 510BT model, this plastic-built refresh retains the original's lightweight, highly portable, and foldable design. It brings notable functional improvements by upgrading to Bluetooth 5.3, which expands the wireless range and significantly boosts battery...Read more

S
soundguys.com
30/12/2024
JBL Tune 520BT review: solid on-ears - SoundGuys

The SoundGuys review of the JBL Tune 520BT highlights the wireless headphones as an exceptional budget option, specifically praising their unmatched objective audio quality, which surpassed more expensive models in testing. Key advantages include a 60-hour-plus battery life, stable Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity, and robust app customization, all within a portable, on-ear design....Read more

L
letemsvetemapplem.eu
27/06/2021
JBL Tune 510BT and Tune 660NC Review: Wireless Models for Everyone JBL Tune 520BT Reviews

The JBL Tune 510BT and 660NC, reviewed by Letem Světem Applem, are nearly identical, lightweight on-ear headphones featuring impressive battery life (40-55 hours) and 5-minute quick charging for two hours of playback. The 510BT serves as an affordable option for casual users, while the 660NC adds functional Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and a slightly larger battery, though both...Read more

C
consumerreports.org
[Undated]
JBL Tune 510BT Headphone Review - Consumer Reports

The JBL Tune 510BT wireless on-ear headphones are noted by Consumer Reports for delivering very good overall sound quality with a warm, lively character and a 40-hour battery life. Key strengths include a high-impact bass response, extended treble that captures room ambiance, and a lightweight, portable design with multi-point Bluetooth pairing. However, the review cites an overly...Read more

M
majorhifi.com
18/07/2021
JBL Tune 510BT Headphones - The Only Review You Need

The Major HiFi review positions the JBL Tune 510BTGo as an exceptionally versatile, budget-friendly option priced at $49.95. Weighing only 160 grams, these lightweight, on-ear headphones feature soft, cushioned earpads and a tight, adjustable headband that provides a secure grip, making them highly portable and well-suited for casual listening or working out. On the capability...Read more

G
goughlui.com
01/09/2025
Review, Teardown: JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones Comparison Reviews

The Gough's Tech Zone review shows that the JBL Tune 520BT is a budget-friendly pair of wireless on-ear headphones with surprising strengths. A major pro is its incredible battery life. It actually lasted 60 hours and 39 minutes in tests, which is even longer than the 57 hours advertised on the box. Other great features include Bluetooth v5.3, support for the high-quality AAC codec,...Read more

T
techradar.com
10/09/2025
I tried JBL's ultra-cheap on-ear headphones and I'd happily recommend them if it weren't for this one problem - TechRadar

The JBL Tune 510BT are budget-friendly, foldable, on-ear wireless headphones available for under $30, making them an incredibly affordable choice for listeners on the go. On the positive side, they offer useful features like multi-point connectivity, voice assistant integration, hands-free calling, and a respectable 40-hour battery life. Their sound quality is decent for the price,...Read more

S
soundguys.com
28/11/2024
JBL Tune 510BT review - SoundGuys

The JBL Tune 510BT, reviewed by SoundGuys, offers a highly portable, user-friendly, and budget-friendly wireless on-ear experience featuring reliable Bluetooth 5.0, AAC support, and Bluetooth multipoint functionality. Key advantages include its compact, foldable design and surprisingly good microphone performance for calls. However, the headset is marred by a significantly...Read more

R
rtings.com
27/05/2024
JBL Tune 520BT Headphones Review - RTINGS.com

The JBL Tune 520BT wireless on-ear headphonesGo offer over 65 hours of continuous battery life and a well-balanced, customizable sound profile via a companion app, according to RTINGS. They feature easy-to-use physical controls and multipoint pairing for convenience. However, the review notes a plasticky build with an unstable, sometimes uncomfortable fit not suited for exercise....Read more

R
rtings.com
17/05/2025
JBL Tune 510BT Headphones Review - RTINGS.com

The JBL Tune 510BT Wireless is a budget-friendly, on-ear headphone featuring a bass-heavy sound profile suitable for genres like EDM, along with an impressive 40-hour battery life and quick charging capabilities. However, the, construction is all-plastic, and the on-ear design lacks active noise cancellation, resulting in poor isolation and potential discomfort over long listening...Read more

R
rtings.com
27/05/2024
JBL Tune 510BT vs Tune 520BT - Headphones - RTINGS.com Would you like a summary of the key performance differences found in these tests, such as the b...

The JBL Tune 520BTGo serves as a notable upgrade over the 510BTGo, offering over 57 hours of battery life and, crucially, JBL Headphones app support for customizable EQ, addressing the 510BT's lack of app compatibility. Both on-ear models share the advantages of a portable, foldable design and Bluetooth multi-point connectivity. However, both headsets lack active noise cancellation,...Read more

T
testventure.de
18/07/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review - Testventure

The JBL Tune 520BT is an affordable pair of wireless on-ear headphones that delivers solid, entry-level performance for budget-conscious users. A key highlight of these lightweight, 157-gram headphones is their exceptional battery life, which offers up to 57 hours of playback alongside a quick-charge feature providing 3 hours of power from just a 5-minute charge. Operating on the...Read more

(Translated)Show original
M
modernhifi.de
28/10/2023
JBL Tune 510BT Review: Budget Headphones | MODERNHIFI

The MODERNHIFI review highlights the JBL Tune 510BT as a highly capable, budget-friendly pair of wireless on-ear headphones scoring 7.8 out of 10 points overall. On the positive side (pros), the reviewer emphasizes an exceptional 40-hour battery life paired with an efficient USB-C fast-charging feature that delivers two hours of playback from a mere five-minute charge. The...Read more

(Translated)Show original
P
protegez-vous.ca
14/04/2026
JBL Tune 520BT Review | Protégez-Vous.ca

The JBL Tune 520BT wireless on-ear headphonesGo are recognized as a budget-friendly option featuring exceptional 57-hour battery life and a quick-charge feature. They offer Bluetooth 5.3 for stable multi-point connection, a lightweight 5.5-ounce design, and a companion app for EQ adjustments. However, the headphones suffer from poor ambient noise isolation due to the lack of ANC....Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
letemsvetemapplem.eu
27/06/2021
JBL Tune 510BT and Tune 660NC Review: Wireless Models for Everyone

The JBL Tune 510BT and Tune 660NC are budget-friendly, over-ear wireless headphones that feature 32mm dynamic drivers, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB-C quick charging. The more premium 660NC distinguishes itself by including Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and a detachable audio cable. While both models offer functional, highly stable, and ergonomic folding designs, they suffer from...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
18/06/2026
JBL TUNE 520BT Review - Testachats

The JBL TUNE 520BT is a lightweight, on-ear wireless headphone model weighing 158 grams and featuring Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity. A key functional highlight is its Bluetooth multipoint technology, which allows users to connect up to two devices simultaneously, such as a smartphone and a laptop, without disconnecting. The device is highly portable due to its foldable design and...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
06/06/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review: Monster Battery Life

The JBL Tune 520BT is an entry-level, on-ear wireless headphone that focuses heavily on affordability and powerful bass performance. The Labo Fnac review highlights its outstanding battery life, measuring a massive 55 hours and 10 minutes of playback, alongside a fast-charging capability that yields 3 hours of listening from just 5 minutes of charging. Built with Bluetooth 5.3, the...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
25/01/2021
JBL Tune 510BT Review: A Very Affordable Lightweight Contender

The Labo Fnac review rates the JBL Tune 510 BT wireless on-ear headphones a 3 out of 5 stars, presenting them as an ultra-lightweight and highly affordable option. The technical lab measurements show that the headphones excel at frequency response (7.6/10), meaning they retransmit sound faithfully without over-emphasizing or under-emphasizing specific audio frequencies. Sound...Read more

(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
06/01/2024
JBL Tune 510BT Review: Our Full Verdict

The Frandroid review highlights the JBL Tune 510BT as a highly affordable, lightweight (160g), and foldable wireless on-ear headset that delivers exceptional battery life and a surprisingly wide soundstage. A major pro is its impressive 38-hour real-world battery performance (nearly matching the advertised 40 hours), which allows for weekend trips without a charger. Additionally,...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
letemsvetemapplem.eu
27/06/2021
JBL Tune 510BT and Tune 660NC Review: Wireless Models for Everyone

The Letem svetem Applem review evaluates the JBL Tune 510BTGo and JBL Tune 660NCGo, highlighting them as budget-friendly wireless headphones with comparable sound performance but differing feature sets. The main pros of both models include an exceptional battery lifespan, with the 510BT providing up to 40 hours and the 660NC extending up to 55 hours with Active Noise Cancelling...Read more

(Translated)Show original
R
rtings.com
No Date
JBL Tune 510BT vs Tune 520BT - Headphones - RTINGS.com

The RTINGS review indicates that the JBL Tune 520BT succeeds the 510BT, offering superior 57-hour battery life and app support with EQ customization. Additionally, the newer 520BT boasts Bluetooth 5.3 and faster charging compared to the 510BT's 40-hour battery and Bluetooth 5.0. However, both models share the same unstable, flimsy on-ear design and lack active noise cancellation for...Read more

(Translated)Show original
R
robadainformatici.it
28/03/2026
JBL Tune 510BT – Full review - Roba Da Informatici", "JBL Tune 510BT – Complete review - IT Stuff

The JBL Tune 510BT are budget-friendly, on-ear wireless headphones that focus on high performance and portability. They are very light, weighing just over 150 grams, and feature a handy foldable design that makes them easy to pack away. While the body is made entirely of plastic to save weight, the soft memory foam and faux leather ear pads ensure a comfortable fit. A major update...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
Undated
JBL Tune 510 BT - Test, Reviews & Prices - Consumentenbond

The Consumentenbond product page highlights the JBL Tune 510 BTGo as an affordable, wireless on-ear headphone priced at €44.95. Key advantages noted in the review include its convenient, modern USB-C charging port and a built-in microphone that allows for seamless, hands-free phone calls without needing to hold a smartphone. Additionally, the testing framework evaluates the device...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

jlab-audio-studio
JLab Audio Studio

Headphones

7.3
jlab-audio-studio-wireless-anc
JLab Audio Studio Wireless ANC

Headphones

7.2
jlab-audio-studio-wireless
JLab Audio Studio Wireless

Headphones

7.0
No image
OneOdio Supereq S2

Headphones

6.9
philips-h4205
Philips H4205

Headphones

6.8
cubitt-headphones-jr
Cubitt Headphones Jr

Headphones

6.6
jbl-tune-520bt
JBL Tune 520BT

Headphones

6.5
philips-tak4206
Philips TAK4206

Headphones

5.9
edifier-wh500
Edifier WH500

Headphones

5.9
jlab-audio-jbuddies-studio
JLab Audio Jbuddies Studio

Headphones

5.8
jbl-tune-500bt
JBL Tune 500BT

Headphones

5.8
philips-tah4205xt
Philips TAH4205xt

Headphones

5.8

Compare JBL Tune 510BT Vs JBL Tune 520BT with

VS
VS

Compare