Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Headphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Focal Elegia Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£570Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Focal Elegia Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.5

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 58% of headphones
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

5.4

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.9

Calls & Controls

▼Worse than 75% of headphones
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 1,114 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 80% of headphones
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
  • focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia
focal-elegia

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Focal Elegia

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

5.4

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.9

Calls & Controls

5.5
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 1,114 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Focal Elegia has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 70.1% of products in this category.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

7.5

Price

6.5
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
Number of microphones
0
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Focal
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
430 g
Weight
430 g
This pair of headphones weighs 430 g, heavier than 96.2% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
4.4
Clamp force
4.4
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 4.4, higher clamp force than 50.9% of headphones and equal to 4.2% of headphones.
Show more

Focal Elegia vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    5 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 24 mm more spacious earcup width
    Earcup inner width
    68 mm
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (68 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    68 mm vs 44 mm
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    0.1 %
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 3 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    105 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 3,000 Hz higher treble extension
    Highest frequency
    23,000 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (23000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20000 Hz.
    23,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 24 mm more spacious earcup width
    Earcup inner width
    68 mm
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (68 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    68 mm vs 44 mm
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    5 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    0.1 %
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 3 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    105 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 3,000 Hz higher treble extension
    Highest frequency
    23,000 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (23000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20000 Hz.
    23,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 97.2% higher weight
    Weight
    430 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (430 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    430 g vs 218 g
  • No voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    no
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 6.33x more expensive
    Focal Elegia is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£570 vs £90).
    £570 vs £90
  • No battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 11.8% worse value for money
    Focal Elegia has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.5 vs 7.3).
    6.5 vs 7.27
  • Tangle-prone cable
    Tangle-free cable
    no
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • 6.33x more expensive
    Focal Elegia is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£570 vs £90).
    £570 vs £90
  • 11.8% worse value for money
    Focal Elegia has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.5 vs 7.3).
    6.5 vs 7.27
  • 97.2% higher weight
    Weight
    430 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (430 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    430 g vs 218 g
  • Tangle-prone cable
    Tangle-free cable
    no
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • No voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    no
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

J
jamesfiorucci.wordpress.com
03/01/2023
Summary of the review
A
audiosciencereview.com
10/11/2021
Summary of the review
H
hifiplus.com
25/03/2020
Summary of the review
S
superbestaudiofriends.org
16/08/2019
Summary of the review
H
headphonereview.com
24/07/2019
Summary of the review
H
hifichoice.com
27/06/2019
Summary of the review
A
audiophilestyle.com
18/04/2019
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
05/03/2019
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
21/12/2018
Summary of the review
T
themasterswitch.com
(Date not specified)
Summary of the review
S
soundstagesolo.com
10/10/2018
Summary of the review
M
majorhifi.com
15/10/2018
Summary of the review
H
hifi-ifas.de
03/12/2018
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
01/01/2019
Summary of the review
M
miniklangwunder.de
18/11/2018
Summary of the review
L
lowbeats.de
16/07/2021
Summary of the review
L
lowbeats.de
04/12/2018
Summary of the review
O
ocinside.de
08/11/2018
Summary of the review
S
stereo.de
01/09/2019
Summary of the review
A
avcesar.com
15/04/2019
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
30/12/2019
Summary of the review
O
on-mag.fr
20/02/2019
Summary of the review
D
digitalvideoht.it
10/07/2019
Summary of the review
A
afdigitale.it
06/03/2019
Summary of the review
F
fwd.nl
17/08/2019
Summary of the review
A
alpha-audio.net
01/03/2019
Summary of the review
H
hifi.nl
17/02/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,114 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Focal Elegia

  • Exceptional midrange clarity and detail retrieval for a closed-back design.
  • Premium build quality using high-end materials like aluminum and microfiber.
  • Very easy to drive from portable sources due to high sensitivity and low impedance.
  • Excellent noise isolation and minimal sound leakage for office or travel use.
  • Generous padding and comfortable ear pads for long listening sessions.
  • Spacious soundstage that feels wider than most traditional closed-back headphones.

What we don't like about Focal Elegia

  • Stock cable is widely criticized for being too stiff, short, and microphonic.
  • Bass response lacks sub-bass rumble and may feel thin to 'bassheads'.
  • Polarizing frequency response with 'wonky' or recessed areas that benefit heavily from EQ.
  • Relatively high clamping pressure can cause discomfort during extended wear.
  • Bulky design makes them less portable than other travel-oriented headphones.
  • Timbre can occasionally sound slightly metallic or unnatural on certain tracks.

Verdict

The Focal Elegia is a premium circum-aural closed-back headphone featuring 40mm aluminum/magnesium 'M'-shape dome drivers (5Hz–23kHz frequency response) and low 35-ohm impedance, making it easy to drive with portable devices. Renowned for its exceptional passive isolation, fast transients, and detailed, punchy sound, it offers remarkable midrange clarity and high-end build quality using materials like solid aluminum, leather, and microfiber. Main pros include its comfortable design for long sessions, great soundstaging for a closed-back, and excellent detail retrieval. Cons often cited are the very stiff, microphonic 1.2m stock cable, a slightly heavy (430g) construction, and a somewhat analytical or 'wonky' tonality in the lower treble that some users prefer to correct with EQ.

Compare Focal Elegia with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Focal Elegia and other products in the Headphones category

No results found