Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Brainwavz B200 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Brainwavz B200 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 74% of headphones
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

6.4

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

8.0

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.9

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 55%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £150
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Brainwavz B200

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

6.4

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

8.0

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.9

Calls & Controls

5.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Brainwavz B200 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
balanced armature
Driver size
?
Number of drivers
2
This pair of headphones uses 2 drivers, more drivers than 96% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
12 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 12 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 64.9% of headphones and equal to 2.1% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Brainwavz
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
12 g
This pair of headphones weighs 12 g, lighter than 92.7% of headphones and equal to 1.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

Brainwavz B200 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 94.5% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (12 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    12 g vs 218 g
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • 6 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (12 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    12 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 94.5% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (12 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    12 g vs 218 g
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • 6 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (12 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    12 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 5.87x less popular
    Brainwavz B200 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Brainwavz B200 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.97 vs 7.3).
    6.97 vs 7.27
  • 66.7% more expensive
    Brainwavz B200 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£150 vs £90).
    £150 vs £90
  • 5.87x less popular
    Brainwavz B200 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Brainwavz B200 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.97 vs 7.3).
    6.97 vs 7.27
  • 66.7% more expensive
    Brainwavz B200 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£150 vs £90).
    £150 vs £90
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Damir Franc
≈ estimated
11/05/2018
Hands-on review · sound, comfort and cable tests
Verdict
Brainwavz B200 is the best-reviewed option at this price once tuned, though the cable tangles and the sound needs tweaking.
9.0
WhatGear
≈ estimated
12/08/2017
Hands-on comparison · fit and sound tests
Verdict
Brainwavz B200 is clearer and more comfortable than the comparison pair, making it a strong pick for sound quality.
7.0
Porta.Fi
≈ estimated
24/04/2017
Hands-on review · sound, fit and build tests
Verdict
Brainwavz B200 is an interesting, darker option for bass lovers, but not universal, so test it before buying.
7.0
CyberCat Technologies
≈ estimated
01/10/2018
Comparison review · three models, fit and sound tests
Verdict
Brainwavz B200 offers unique, very detailed sound that suits a few listeners well, but lacks low-end bass without a good source.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
head-fi.org
17/02/2017
Summary of the review
techpowerup.com
09/05/2017
Hands-on review · Neutral in-ear
Verdict
The Brainwavz B200 is a neutral, airy in-ear with comfortable memory-wire hooks, suiting listeners who want detail over heavy bass.
trustedreviews.com
18/09/2017
Expert review · Dual-driver earphones
Verdict
The Brainwavz B200 offers detailed mids and a generous accessory set at its price, though a mid-bass boost dulls mid detail and the cable is fixed.
soundsandgear.com
11/04/2018
Long-term test · Dual-armature earphones
Verdict
The Brainwavz B200 is a comfortable, open-sounding earphone whose mixes translate well to studio monitors, suiting producers on the move.
resonancereviews.com
05/07/2018
Detailed review · 3D-printed earphones
Verdict
The Brainwavz B200 V2 is a clean, articulate earphone in a polished 3D-printed shell, best for listeners who value precise detail over bass punch.
hifitrends.com
05/05/2019
Listening review · Dual-armature earphones
Verdict
The Brainwavz B200 is a smooth, airy earphone that suits acoustic and jazz, though it lacks bass slam on bass-heavy tracks.
M
miniklangwunder.de
24/11/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Brainwavz B200

  • Exceptional midrange clarity and detail for the price point
  • Highly comfortable and lightweight ergonomic design, suitable for long sessions
  • Wide and deep soundstage with impressive instrument separation
  • Generous accessory package including a hard carry case and Comply foam tips
  • Features a detachable MMCX cable (in newer versions) for increased longevity
  • Above-average passive noise isolation

What customers don't like about Brainwavz B200

  • Bass response is lean and lacks the impact or rumble desired by bass-heavy genres
  • Plastic 3D-printed housing can feel less premium compared to metal competitors
  • Earlier versions lacked an in-line microphone or remote (though often included in current kits)
  • Some users report a slightly 'metallic' or sharp tonality in certain high-frequency tracks
  • Can be sensitive to source noise, potentially requiring a high-quality DAP or amp to avoid hiss

Verdict

The Brainwavz B200 is an audiophile-grade in-ear monitor featuring a dual balanced armature driver configuration with a dedicated tweeter and woofer. Key technical specifications include a 30 Ω impedance, 110 dB sensitivity, and a frequency response of 12 Hz to 22 kHz, making it easy to drive from mobile devices. It is characterized by an ergonomic, lightweight 3D-printed housing designed for over-the-ear wear and provides a balanced sound signature with a detailed mid-range and wide soundstage. Main pros include its exceptional comfort, high-quality accessory package (including Comply foam tips), and accurate imaging; however, some users find the treble slightly rolled off at the top end and the braided cable prone to tangling.

Compare Brainwavz B200 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Brainwavz B200 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found