OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060

6.0/10

▼Worse than 76% of graphics cards

6.6

▼Worse than 78%

5.6

▼Worse than 77%

9.4

★Better than 95%

3.3
Gaming
Gaming
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.8
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
4.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.0
Video editing
Video editing
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
1.8
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.1
1080p
1080p
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.8
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
10.0%
4.4
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.0
1440p
1440p
3.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.8
Floating-point performance
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
15.0%
4.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.2
4K
4K
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.8
Floating-point performance
35.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
4.4
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060

6.0

Show more

Hide

Performance

4.2

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

4.1

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

8.9

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

8.7

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.2

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

160 W

Show more

Design

9.3

Show more

Hide

Size

204.1x 128.6x 43.5 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 vs the average graphics card

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

75 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (210 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
210 mm vs 285 mm
23.1% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
500 W vs 650 W
96 more AI cores
This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
240 vs 144
25.6% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
160 W vs 215 W
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
18% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060
the average graphics card
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.44 vs 8.000).
9.44 vs 8
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0
7 °C higher thermal ceiling
This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
88 °C vs 95 °C

18% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060
the average graphics card
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.44 vs 8.000).
9.44 vs 8
2.37x more popular
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
10 vs 4.22

96 more AI cores
This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
240 vs 144

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

23.1% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
500 W vs 650 W
25.6% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
160 W vs 215 W
7 °C higher thermal ceiling
This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
88 °C vs 95 °C

75 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (210 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
210 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
5.62 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (119.4 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
119.38 mm vs 125 mm

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

32.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
2.4x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
12 nm vs 5 nm
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
192 bit vs 256 bit
1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
28.9% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
10 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
30 vs 40
47.1% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s

9.4% worse value for money
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.58 vs 7.2).
6.58 vs 7.2

32.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
28.9% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
50.6% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (80.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
80.64 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
47.1% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
10 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
30 vs 40
64 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (120 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
120 vs 184
10 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
30 vs 40
71.4% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
6.45 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
16 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
48 vs 64
42.1% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13121 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
13,121 points vs 22,653 points
47.4% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7719 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
7,719 points vs 14,678.5 points
56.4% lower ray tracing score
This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
4,000 points vs 9,166 points
54.7% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5465 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
5,465 points vs 12,074 points
56.6% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (12.9 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
12.9 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
2,432 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1920 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
1,920 vs 4,352
71.9% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
6.45 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
54.2% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.22 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS

6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
192 bit vs 256 bit
26.3% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
25% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
87.5% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
3 MB vs 24 MB
50% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
64 vs 128

2.4x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
12 nm vs 5 nm
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
4 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
January 2019
2,019 vs 2,023
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older Vulkan version
This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
1.3 vs 1.4
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
7 vs 8
50.8% larger GPU die
This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
445 mm² vs 295 mm²
52.8% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
10,800 million vs 22,900 million
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Older DisplayPort version
This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
1.4 vs 1.4a
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
2.0b vs 2.1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
4 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No fan stop
This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
29 dB noisier at idle
This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
29 dB vs 0 dB
4.6 dB noisier under load
This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (40 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
40 dB vs 35.4 dB

No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

au.pcmag.com

31/01/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp Review - PCMag Australia

The Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp is praised as a performance and value leader for upper-mid-level graphics cards, delivering a substantial per-dollar performance leap over the prior Pascal generation. Built on Nvidia's Turing architecture, this factory-overclocked card features 1,920 CUDA cores, a 1,800MHz boost clock, and 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, making it ideally suited for smooth 1440p gaming. In benchmark testing, the card consistently outperformed the older GTX 1060 by roughly 61 percent and beat the GTX 1070 by 19 percent, while trailing the much more expensive RTX 2070 by a mere 8 percent. It is a highly compact, true two-slot card measuring 8.3 inches long, featuring an intricately-cut aluminum backplate, a white-backlit logo, and a dual 90mm fan cooling solution that keeps core temperatures stable at a cool 64°C even under manual overclocking workloads. The review highlights several distinct pros and cons for prospective buyers. The primary advantages include its exceptional value, as it runs faster than the GeForce GTX 1070 for less money, alongside a quiet dual-fan thermal design and excellent headroom for manual...

pcmag.com

30/01/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp Review

The Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp is highlighted by PCMag as a high-value, compact two-slot graphics card that delivers strong generation-over-generation performance, frequently beating the GTX 1070. It features a robust, stylish aluminum backplate, quiet 90mm twin fans, and effective heat pipes that allow for solid thermal performance and mild overclocking. However, the card lacks the VirtualLink USB Type-C port found on the Founders Edition and comes with a higher price point than traditional "60-class" GPUs. Additionally, while offering 6GB of VRAM, the reviewer notes that 8GB would have provided better long-term future-proofing for demanding workloads.

thinkcomputers.org

28/01/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan Graphics Card Review

The ThinkComputers review awards the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan a 9/10 score and Recommended Award, praising its $349 price point, compact dual-fan IceStorm 2.0 cooling, and strong 1440p gaming performance. Key advantages include the card's ability to drive high-refresh 1080p displays, the inclusion of an attractive metal backplate, and support for modern DLSS and ray-tracing features. Conversely, the review notes the card lacks NVLink/SLI support, and the shroud, while functional, does not feature RGB lighting. Additionally, it ships with stock reference speeds rather than factory overclocks and requires manual configuration for increased performance.

smallformfactor.net

25/01/2019

Summary of the review

ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan Review

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan is a capable, entry-level ray-tracing card, boasting a compact 209.6 mm length suitable for Small Form Factor (SFF) builds. It delivers excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance with 6GB of GDDR6 memory, while featuring a durable gunmetal design with a full-cover backplate and versatile display outputs. However, the card's IceStorm 2.0 fans lack an idle-stop feature, leading to continuous operation, and they become quite loud under load. Other drawbacks include the lack of a USB Type-C VirtualLink port and limited long-term future-proofing due to the 6GB VRAM constraint at higher settings.

bit-tech.net

18/02/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Amp Review | bit-tech.net

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 Amp is a compact, 210mm long dual-slot graphics card designed for budget-conscious users looking for ray tracing and AI-enhanced visuals at a lower price point. Built on a modified PCB likely shared with the RTX 2070 Mini, it features a 6 phase power design, 6GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 14Gbps, and a factory overclock that boosts the clock speed by 120MHz to 1,800MHz. To maintain power delivery under its increased 170W TDP, the card utilizes a single eight-pin PCIe connector. It relies on the IceStorm 2.0 cooling system, which utilizes dual 90mm fans, horizontal aluminium fins, and three nickel-plated copper heat pipes contacting a copper baseplate, with integrated thermal pads for the memory and MOSFETs. For connectivity, Zotac opted for premium outputs, featuring three DisplayPort 1.4 connections and one HDMI 2.0b port. A major selling point of the card is its excellent build quality, highlighted by a protective metal backplate that ensures system robustness and outclasses rival cards with bare PCBs. Additionally, its small footprint allows it to fit into nearly any system,...

uk.pcmag.com

30/01/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp Review - PCMag UK

The Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp is a compact, factory-overclocked graphics card that provides an excellent performance-per-dollar value compared to its predecessors and more expensive stablemates. Built on Nvidia’s Turing architecture, it features a 50% increase in CUDA cores and a 75% boost in memory bandwidth over the GTX 1060. Testing shows the card is highly consistent, outperforming the older GTX 1070 by double-digit percentages and trailing the much pricier RTX 2070 by an average of only 8%. It delivers highly capable 1440p gaming performance, stays remarkably cool under load (averaging just 64°C in stability tests), and features quiet dual 90mm fans along with an intricately-cut aluminum backplate for added structural strength. The card's primary advantages include being faster than the GTX 1070 for less money, operating with quiet fans, and offering a compact dual-slot footprint alongside mild manual overclocking headroom. However, it does come with several distinct disadvantages, most notably the total omission of a VirtualLink USB Type-C port, which is a potential deal-breaker for users wanting next-generation VR headset connectivity. It is also priced higher than the GTX...

techpowerup.com

14/01/2019

Summary of the review

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 AMP 6 GB Review | TechPowerUp

The TechPowerUp review for the Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 AMP highlights an impressive, compact custom MHz factory overclock, Samsung GDDR6 memory with high overclocking headroom, and a metal backplate for enhanced durability. Priced at $379 at launch, the 21 cm dual-slot design offers strong performance, surpassing standard reference models. Key drawbacks noted by TechPowerUp include the lack of an idle-fan-stop feature, causing the fans to run constantly. The cooling system produces high noise levels reaching 40 dBA under load, and the design omits the VirtualLink USB Type-C port found on other models.

pcmag.com

30/01/2019

Summary of the review

Análisis de la Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp

The Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp is lauded by PCMag as an excellent upper-mid-range card, featuring a compact, quiet design that delivers superior performance to the GTX 1070 for a lower price. Utilizing Nvidia's Turing architecture, this Editors' Choice winner provides accessible ray tracing and DLSS, while offering strong overclocking potential. Drawbacks identified in the review include the lack of a VirtualLink USB-C port and a limiting 6GB VRAM, which may hinder future-proofing compared to 8GB alternatives. Despite these, it remains a high-value option, though it carries a higher price point than the GTX 1060 it succeeds.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060

Excellent 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming performance
Compact dual-slot design fits easily in most small form factor cases
Solid build quality featuring a durable metal backplate
Operates quietly during idle and light workloads
Effective IceStorm 2.0 cooling system keeps temps stable under load
Includes essential modern features like Ray Tracing and DLSS support
Strong price-to-performance ratio compared to previous generation cards

What we don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060

Lacks an idle-fan-stop feature; fans spin continuously even when idle
Fans can become noticeably loud under extreme synthetic or 100% loads
Limited to 6GB of VRAM, which can be a bottleneck for 4K or modern AAA titles
Only provides a single HDMI port, requiring DisplayPort adapters for multi-HDMI setups
Lacks a VirtualLink USB Type-C port found on some competing models
Reported instances of coil whine at very high usage levels
Requires an 8-pin power connector, which may require adapters for older power supplies

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 is a mid-range graphics card built on NVIDIA's 12nm Turing architecture, featuring 1,920 CUDA cores and 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. It operates with a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, delivering a memory speed of 14 Gbps and supporting real-time ray tracing and DLSS technology. Its main advantages include a compact dual-slot design (approximately 8.3 inches long) that fits easily into smaller cases, efficient IceStorm 2.0 cooling with dual 90mm fans, and a protective wraparound metal backplate. However, the card is often criticized for its relatively limited 6GB VRAM which can bottleneck performance in modern high-resolution titles, its lack of a VirtualLink USB-C port found on other models, and its reliance on the older PCIe 3.0 interface.

Best alternatives

PowerColor Radeon RX 7800 XT

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Super Twin Edge OC

Graphics cards

INNO3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ventus 2X OC

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X 16GB

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X Black OC 16GB

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 5070 OC Edition

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Jetstream OC 16GB

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Amp Spider Man 16GB

Graphics cards

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 1 Click OC 16GB

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found