OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB

5.1/10

▼Worse than 96% of graphics cards

6.4

▼Worse than 88%

4.3

▼Worse than 91%

4.3

▼Worse than 93%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

2.1
Gaming
Gaming
2.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures floating-point compute power, dedicated VRAM capacity, ray-tracing hardware, and modern PCIe generation bandwidth.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.2
FP32 performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.5
Video editing
Video editing
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates hardware AV1 encoding support, generous video memory, raw compute power, and fast interface throughput.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.2
FP32 performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.1
1080p
1080p
2.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses pure rasterization power and VRAM balance optimized for consistently high frame rates at 1080p resolution.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.2
FP32 performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.8
1440p
1440p
1.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures compute throughput, sufficient VRAM buffer, and ray-tracing performance tailored for sharp 1440p gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.2
FP32 performance
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.9
4K
4K
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates ultra-high compute capability, heavy VRAM capacities, and advanced ray-tracing cores required for native 4K gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.2
FP32 performance
35.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What owners say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB

Based on 173 owners sharing their experience in online comments

75%positive5%mixed20%negative

Owners praise smooth gaming at practical settings, while limited speed in demanding games means lower settings and modest frame rates.

What owners like

Runs most modern games well at mid to high settings, and many owners hit 60 fps at 1080p and some at ultra.102
Handles 1080p gaming well at medium to high settings, often reaching 60 fps, though demanding titles need lowered settings.14
Gives a clear jump over older integrated graphics and weak cards, playing games at 30 to 60 fps.9
Draws little power and needs no extra connector, so it fits old office PCs and low-profile builds with only a PCIe slot.5
Stays cool under gaming loads, with owners reporting temperatures in the 60s during long sessions.4
Handles creative and work tasks like video editing, CAD and Blender well, and runs well with extra RAM.4

What owners dislike

Struggles with demanding and newer games, often dropping to 30 to 40 fps at higher settings.27
Falls well behind newer and higher-tier cards, often delivering about half the frame rate of cards like the GTX 1080 Ti or RTX 3060 Ti.7
Some owners report sudden fps drops, stuttering, crashes and glitches, especially in demanding games or after overclocking.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB

5.1

Show more

Hide

Performance

2.6

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

FP32 performance

Show more

Memory

2.1

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

?

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Effective memory speed

Show more

Features

7.7

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity

7.3

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power

8.8

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

75 W

Show more

Design

9.0

Show more

Hide

Size

?

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB vs the average graphics card

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
120.2 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (162 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
162 mm vs 282.2 mm
65.9% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
75 W vs 220 W
14.3% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0
10 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
115 mm vs 125 mm

2.89x cheaper
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £520).
£180 vs £520

14.3% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
65.9% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
75 W vs 220 W
65.9% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
75 W vs 220 W

120.2 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (162 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
162 mm vs 282.2 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
10 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
115 mm vs 125 mm

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

34.1% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
40.3% lower review score
Reviews score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
4.3
Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score
80%
7.2
Average grade
20%
7.4
Popularity
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
4.3 vs 7.2
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
26 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
14 vs 40
Less advanced frame generation
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
128 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
56 vs 184
75.3% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (93.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
93.24 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s

40.3% lower review score
Reviews score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
4.3
Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score
80%
7.2
Average grade
20%
7.4
Popularity
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
4.3 vs 7.2
44.9% lower sentiment score
4.3 vs 7.8
15.2% worse value for money
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.43 vs 7.4).
6.43 vs 7.41

34.1% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
26 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
14 vs 40
128 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
56 vs 184
75.3% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (93.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
93.24 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
67% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (53.3 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
53.28 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
26.6% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,410 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,410 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
32 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
32 vs 64
86.8% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
2.98 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
65.2% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (7,870 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
7,870 points vs 22,638 points
76.3% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (3,500 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
3,500 points vs 14,779 points
4 years older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
2,019 vs 2,023
62.8% lower ray tracing score
This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3,400 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
3,400 points vs 9,148 points
81.3% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.09 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
74.8% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (3,037 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
3,037 points vs 12,070.5 points
79.8% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (6 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
5.97 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
3,456 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (896 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
896 vs 4,352

8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
71.4% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
57.9% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
8,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
128 bit vs 192 bit
95.8% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
1 MB vs 24 MB
50% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
64 KB vs 128 KB

Less advanced frame generation
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
2.4x larger process node
This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
12 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
No AI upscalers
This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No Resizable BAR
This graphics card does not support Resizable BAR, while the average graphics card does. 76.4% of Graphics cards support it.
Lower VRS tier
This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
Tier 1 vs Tier 2
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
Older shader model
This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
6.6 vs 6.8
79.5% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (4,700 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
4,700 million vs 22,900 million
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1a).
2.0b vs 2.1a
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
More basic codec support
This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Not VR ready
This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
2 fewer monitors per output type
This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
1 vs 3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
4 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3

No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0

ALL TECH UNBOXING

≈ estimated

09/02/2022

Unboxing · game test · God of War frame rate

Verdict

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB posts low frame rates without DLSS, so the reviewer recommends an RTX card instead.

7.0

DVZN Media

≈ estimated

20/05/2019

Hands-on review · gameplay tests and budget use

Verdict

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB is a budget card for beginners and PCs without spare power connectors, but used or AMD cards offer better value.

Hands-on video, no verdict

Not graded

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB

75 W power draw keeps the demands on the rest of the PC low.
A recommended 300 W power supply is modest.
4 GB of memory handles lighter games.
FSR support helps frame rates in games that use it.
At 162 mm long, it fits most mid-size cases.
Two fans help move heat away from the chip.

What customers don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB

No ray tracing, so lighting effects stay off.
No DLSS, and FSR is the only upscaling option.
Only one DisplayPort and one DVI output limit multi-screen setups.
2.98 TFLOPS of FP32 power is modest for newer titles.
No AV1 decode, so some newer streaming video leans on the processor.

Verdict

For a cheap card that handles older and less demanding games, the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB is a sensible pick. Its 4 GB of memory and 1650 MHz boost clock are enough for lighter titles. The power draw is 75 W at peak, and the recommended 300 W power supply is modest, so older PCs can handle it. It is 162 mm long and weighs 720 g, which fits most mid-size cases. The trade-off is missing modern tricks. There is no ray tracing and no DLSS, and FSR is the only upscaling option. Two fans keep the chip running cooler, and CUDA support adds some useful software options. It suits a buyer on a tight budget who wants a simple, low-power upgrade for light gaming and everyday work.

Best alternatives

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Mini

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT 8GB

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3050 OC Edition 6GB

Graphics cards

Yeston GeForce GTX 1050TI

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 3050 Ventus 2X OC 6GB

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce RTX 3050 Pegasus OC 6GB

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Solo 6GB

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3050 Low Profile 6GB

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC

Graphics cards

GALAX GeForce GTX 1650 EX 1-Click OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 AMP Core 4GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found