OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC

4.9/10

▼Worse than 88% of graphics cards

6.3

▼Worse than 85%

4.4

▼Worse than 91%

9.1

▲Better than 87%

2.0
Gaming
Gaming
2.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.1
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.5
Video editing
Video editing
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.1
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.1
1080p
1080p
2.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.1
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.8
1440p
1440p
1.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.1
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.8
4K
4K
1.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.1
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC

4.9

Show more

Hide

Performance

2.8

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

2.4

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

7.9

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

7.2

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.9

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

75 W

Show more

Design

8.6

Show more

Hide

Size

229x 119x 36 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC vs the average graphics card

Why is GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
94 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (191 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
191 mm vs 285 mm
66.7% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
75 W vs 225 W
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0
13.9% higher user score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC
the average graphics card
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.11 vs 8.000).
9.11 vs 8
2.94x cheaper
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
£180 vs £530

13.9% higher user score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC
the average graphics card
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.11 vs 8.000).
9.11 vs 8
2.94x cheaper
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
£180 vs £530
2.22x more popular
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9.37 vs 4.2).
9.37 vs 4.22

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
66.7% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
75 W vs 225 W
58.3% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
5 W vs 12 W
65.9% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
75 W vs 220 W

94 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (191 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
191 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
6 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (119 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
119 mm vs 125 mm
46.1% lighter card weight
This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (550 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
550 g vs 1,021 g

Why is GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
28.7% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1785 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,785 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
26 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
14 vs 40
128 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
56 vs 184
2.4x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
12 nm vs 5 nm
83.8% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (61.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
61.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s

14.2% worse value for money
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.3 vs 7.2).
6.3 vs 7.2

28.7% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1785 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,785 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
26 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
14 vs 40
128 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
56 vs 184
83.8% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (61.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
61.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
65% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (57.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
57.12 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
32 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
32 vs 64
86.4% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
3.06 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
22.7% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1485 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,485 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
65.3% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (7868 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
7,868 points vs 22,653 points
76.2% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (3500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
3,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
62.9% lower ray tracing score
This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3403 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
3,403 points vs 9,166 points
75% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (3016 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
3,016 points vs 12,074 points
79.9% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
5.97 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
81.3% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.09 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
3,456 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (896 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
896 vs 4,352
87% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
2.98 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
97.6% lower INT8 performance
This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (5.9 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
5.9 TOPS vs 242 TOPS

128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
57.1% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (192 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
192 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
57.9% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8002 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
8,002 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
14.3% slower VRAM clock
This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
1,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
50% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
64 vs 128

2.4x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
12 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
No AI upscalers
This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
4 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
April 2019
2,019 vs 2,023
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Lower VRS tier
This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
Tier 1 vs Tier 2
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
6 vs 8
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
71.2% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (6600 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
6,600 million vs 22,900 million
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Older DisplayPort version
This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
1.4 vs 1.4a
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
2.0b vs 2.1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
Not VR ready
This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
No vs yes
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
4 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
9 °C higher idle temperature
This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (46 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
46 °C vs 37 °C

No backplate
This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

mightygadget.com

08/04/2026

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Windforce OC 4G Graphics Card Review

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Windforce OC 4G is a low-powered, budget-friendly graphics card featuring a core clock speed of 1710 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory. It is highly suited for a home theatre PC (HTPC) or a media server, as it supports Plex hardware transcoding and enables 4K HDR streaming through Netflix. Equipped with a premium WINDFORCE 2X dual-fan system that features alternate spinning blades, the card operates silently in passive mode during non-gaming tasks. It also boasts excellent power efficiency with a low 75W TDP, meaning it only requires a single 6-pin power connector, while offering generous connectivity through three HDMI ports and one DisplayPort. However, the card falls short as a dedicated gaming option due to its low performance-to-cost ratio compared to its competitors. While it achieves playable frame rates between 48 to 57 FPS at 1080p in titles like Far Cry 5 and The Witcher 3, it struggles significantly at higher resolutions. Benchmarks show poor results in demanding tests, scoring just 3654 in Time Spy and 1413 in Firestrike Ultra. Additionally, when the cooling fans...

guru3d.com

10/04/2020

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WindForce OC GDDR6Go to product viewer dialog for this item. review

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 WindForce OC GDDR6 review by Guru3D highlights a budget-oriented graphics card refreshed with faster 12 Gbps GDDR6 memory to replace aging GDDR5 stock. Built on the 12nm "TU117" Turing architecture with 896 shader processors, this model strips away ray-tracing (RT) and Tensor cores to maximize affordability for mainstream users targeting capable 1080p gaming. The pros of this specific Gigabyte implementation include its excellent energy efficiency operating at a modest 75W TDP, a silent passive-cooling idle mode, and highly effective thermal management where the dual-fan WindForce system caps heavy gaming stress temperatures at just 65°C. Additionally, it provides solid factory-overclocked performance out of the box, boasting a boosted clock speed of 1710 MHz compared to the reference design's 1590 MHz. Conversely, the review exposes notable cons, primarily centered around a highly saturated and potentially confusing entry-level market crowded with regular GDDR5, GDDR6 rehashes, and slightly faster "Super" SKUs. While the transition to GDDR6 improves memory bandwidth throughput to 12 Gbit/s, it simultaneously introduces a slightly lower reference boost clock frequency (1590 MHz vs. 1665 MHz on...

cowcotland.com

29/04/2020

Summary of the review

Test carte graphique Gigabyte GTX 1650 D6 WINDFORCE OC 4G

The CowcotLand review of the Gigabyte GTX 1650 D6 Windforce OC 4G identifies the card as an energy-efficient option for entry-level 1080p gaming, boasting low power draw (4W idle, 133W load) and effective thermal management, with temperatures reaching 63°C under load. A noted drawback is that the dual-fan cooler can become slightly noisy during heavy, sustained gaming loads. Equipped with GDDR6 memory, the card offers a performance boost over earlier models, making it suitable for eSports, though its position at the bottom of the current GPU hierarchy limits performance in demanding AAA titles. While it acts as a strong, cost-effective upgrade for systems with limited power supplies, it faces stiff competition, making it a niche, power-efficient choice rather than a top performance value.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC

Excellent power efficiency with low 75W power draw
Effective Windforce 2X cooling system that keeps the card around 65°C under load
Quiet operation, especially in low-load scenarios with semi-passive fan modes
Compact design suitable for Mini-ITX cases and small-form-factor builds
Factory overclock provides a performance boost over reference models
Reliable for 1080p gaming in eSports titles like Fortnite and Rocket League
Easy 'plug-and-play' installation without needing additional PCIe power connectors

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC

Struggles to maintain a consistent 60 FPS in demanding modern AAA titles at 1080p
Poor value proposition compared to the significantly faster GTX 1650 Super
Limited to 4GB of VRAM, which can be a bottleneck for higher texture settings
Acoustic profile can sometimes be high-pitched when fans spin at high speeds
Restricted manual overclocking potential due to fixed power limits
Lacks a backplate on some variants, making the PCB look less premium
No idle fan-stop feature on some earlier GDDR6 versions

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 Windforce OC is a compact entry-level graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Turing TU117 architecture with 896 CUDA cores and 4GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface. It features a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1710 MHz and the Windforce 2X cooling system, which utilizes two 80mm alternate spinning fans and 3D Active Fan technology for semi-passive, silent operation during low loads. Its main advantages include high energy efficiency with a 75W TDP, excellent thermal management reaching peaks of approximately 65°C, and a plug-and-play design that fits easily into small form factor systems. However, its performance is limited for modern 1080p gaming at high settings, it lacks a backplate for structural reinforcement, and its fan noise can become noticeable under heavy stress due to a locked power limit that restricts manual overclocking headroom.

Best alternatives

SPARKLE ARC A580 Orc OC Edition

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT

Graphics cards

ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming D OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3050

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3050 OC Edition 6GB

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3050 Eagle

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Stormx

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 3050 Ventus 2X OC 6GB

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 570

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 WINDFORCE OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found