OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

8.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 77%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.7

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 86%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

8.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

5.7
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.7

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has a popularity score of 3.5 points, which is lower than that of 52.1% of products in this category.
3.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,500 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 7,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 79% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
2,800 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 2,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,115 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 14,115 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 76.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
5,465 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 5,465 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 81.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
6.45 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 6.45 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
6 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 6 GB of VRAM, which is less than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to 5.2% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 336 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 63.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
229x 113x 35 mm
Length
229 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 229 mm long, which is shorter than 81.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
113 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 113 mm tall, which is shorter than 75.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
764 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 764 g, which is lighter than 74.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 56 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (229 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    229 mm vs 285 mm
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 12 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (113 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    113 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 56 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (229 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    229 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (113 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    113 mm vs 125 mm
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 10 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    30 vs 40
  • 47.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10.4% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.52 vs 7.2).
    6.52 vs 7.2
  • 2.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.82 vs 8.000).
    7.82 vs 8
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 50.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (80.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    80.64 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 47.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    30 vs 40
  • 64 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (120 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    120 vs 184
  • 10 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    30 vs 40
  • 71.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 37.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14115 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    14,115 points vs 22,653 points
  • 48.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 69.5% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (2800 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    2,800 points vs 9,166 points
  • 54.7% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5465 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    5,465 points vs 12,074 points
  • 56.6% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (12.9 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    12.9 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2,432 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1920 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,920 vs 4,352
  • 71.9% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    6.45 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 25% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    January 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 52.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 28 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (28 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    28 dB vs 0 dB
  • 5.5 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (72.5 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    72.5 °C vs 67 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
club386.com
20/09/2025
Summary of the review
Is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 worth it in 2025? Would you like a comparison of how this card performs against the RTX 2060 SuperGo to product viewer dial...
C
custompc.com
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 review
A
au.pcmag.com
23/02/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Ventus OC EditionGo to product viewer dialog for this item. Review
B
beebom.com
28/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Review: Gateway to the World of Ray Tracing
T
techradar.com
07/12/2022
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 review Tom's Hardware
D
digitalfoundry.net
07/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 review: Ray tracing comes to the mainstream
T
tweaktown.com
07/01/2019
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060: Nearly As Fast As GTX 1080
P
pcmag.com
05/03/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition Review
T
techpowerup.com
08/01/2019
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders EditionGo to product viewer dialog for this item. 6 GB Review
I
invisioncommunity.co.uk
16/05/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 2060Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. Casual Review
K
kitguru.net
10/05/2019
Summary of the review
Gigabyte RTX 2060 Gaming OC Pro 6GGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review
G
godisageek.com
18/03/2019
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 review - GodisaGeek.com
B
bit-tech.net
10/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Founders EditionGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review
B
bit-tech.net
15/03/2019
Summary of the review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming OC Pro Review
P
pcper.com
07/01/2019
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Review Part One: Initial Testing
T
trustedreviews.com
15/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 2060 review: The cheapest Turing card is an affordable masterclass
T
tomshardware.com
08/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Review: Is Mainstream Ray Tracing Feasible?
T
techspot.com
21/01/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Review & Mega Benchmark
N
notebooks-und-mobiles.de
05/08/2019
Summary of the review
Nvidia Geforce RTX 2060 im Test - Notebooks und Mobiles
(Translated)Show original
P
pcgameshardware.de
08/01/2019
Summary of the review
Geforce RTX 2060 im Test: Benchmarks - PCGH
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

  • Excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance for its price class
  • Affordable entry point for real-time ray tracing and DLSS technology
  • Strong overclocking potential, often reaching stock RTX 2070 performance levels
  • Efficient power consumption compared to previous generation high-end cards
  • Compact design options available, making it suitable for small form factor builds
  • Solid VR performance and consistent frame rates in most modern titles

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

  • 6GB VRAM capacity can be a bottleneck for demanding games at higher resolutions
  • Ray tracing significantly impacts frame rates, sometimes making it unplayable in intense scenes
  • Launch price was considered high for a '60-tier' mainstream card
  • Fans on some models, including the Founders Edition, can be noisy under heavy load
  • Limited future-proofing due to the rapid release of more powerful 'Super' variants
  • Placement of the 8-pin power connector on some models can be awkward for cable management

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060, based on the 12nm Turing architecture, features 1,920 CUDA cores, 30 Ray Tracing cores, and 240 Tensor cores, delivering a base clock of 1,365 MHz and a boost clock of 1,680 MHz. It is equipped with 6GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 192-bit bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 336 GB/s and a total board power of 160W. Main pros include excellent 1080p and solid 1440p gaming performance, support for real-time ray tracing and DLSS, and a compact, efficient cooling design. However, it is limited by its relatively small 6GB memory buffer which can struggle with ultra-texture settings in modern titles, and it completely lacks NVLink support for multi-GPU configurations.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found