Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ60VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):120 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
4.2/10

Overall score

Score
4.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.7

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–ĽWorse than 95% of graphics cards
5.9

Value for money

Value for money
5.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–ĽWorse than 93%
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

1.9

Performance

24%

1.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

6.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.7

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

â–ĽWorse than 96%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 66%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
nvidia-geforce-gtx-960
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

1.9

Performance

24%

1.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

6.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.7

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

3.7
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
2,600 points
This graphics card scores 2,600 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 93.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
6,135 points
This graphics card scores 6,135 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
2,801 points
This graphics card scores 2,801 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 92.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
2.41 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 2.41 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 94.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 112.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 93.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
120 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 120 W, which is lower than that of 83% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
120 W
This graphics card draws 120 W under peak load, which is lower than 85.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
400 W
This graphics card recommends a 400 W PSU, which is lower than that of 90.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
140 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 140 W, which is lower than that of 79.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
120 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
241 mm
This graphics card is 241 mm long, which is shorter than 75% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
812 g
This graphics card weighs 812 g, which is lighter than 70.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 44.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (120 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    120 W vs 215 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 8.83x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 is cheaper than the average graphics card (ÂŁ60 vs ÂŁ530).
    ÂŁ60 vs ÂŁ530
  • 8.83x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 is cheaper than the average graphics card (ÂŁ60 vs ÂŁ530).
    ÂŁ60 vs ÂŁ530
  • 3.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.27 vs 8.000).
    8.27 vs 8
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 0.2% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1753 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,753 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 44.2% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (120 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    120 W vs 215 W
  • 37.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    140 W vs 225 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 53% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1178 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,178 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • 41.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1127 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,127 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 21.1% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.94 vs 7.2).
    5.94 vs 7.2
  • 53% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1178 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,178 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • 41.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1127 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,127 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 120 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    64 vs 184
  • 80.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (75.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    75.39 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 76.9% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (37.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    37.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 89.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (2.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    2.46 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 72.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (6135 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    6,135 points vs 22,653 points
  • 82.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (2600 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    2,600 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 89.5% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (2.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    2.41 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 76.8% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (2801 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    2,801 points vs 12,074 points
  • 83.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.08 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3,328 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,024 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,024 vs 4,352
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 75% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (112.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    112.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 63.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7010 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    7,010 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 95.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    1 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2015 vs 2023).
    January 2015
    2,015 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    5 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 87.2% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (2940 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    2,940 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
    2.0 vs 2.1
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 4.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (40 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    40 dB vs 35.4 dB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclockers.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
09/02/2015
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
12/02/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
N
nitroware.net
03/02/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
29/01/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
18/10/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
15/07/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
27/02/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
22/01/2015
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
24/01/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

  • High power efficiency with low TDP (120W)
  • Excellent acoustic performance (runs very quiet)
  • Stays cool under heavy load
  • Solid 1080p performance for eSports and older AAA titles
  • Support for modern features like HDMI 2.0 and HEVC decoding
  • Great overclocking headroom in most aftermarket models
  • Compact size makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

  • Limited VRAM (2GB base model) struggles with modern textures
  • Narrow 128-bit memory bus restricts high-resolution gaming
  • Mediocre performance leap over the previous GTX 760
  • Poor value compared to the 4GB variants of competitor cards (at launch)
  • Lacks support for modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features
  • Noticeable performance drops in 1440p or higher resolutions

Verdict

Launched in 2015, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 is a mid-range graphics card built on the 28nm Maxwell architecture (GM206), featuring 1,024 CUDA cores, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It typically comes with either 2GB or 4GB of GDDR5 VRAM on a 128-bit memory bus, operating at a base clock of 1127 MHz and a boost clock of 1178 MHz. Its main strengths include exceptional power efficiency with a low 120W TDP, support for HDMI 2.0 and DirectX 12, and solid 1080p gaming performance for its era. However, it is primarily held back by its narrow 128-bit memory interface and the limited 2GB of VRAM on standard models, which often causes performance bottlenecks in modern, texture-heavy games or at resolutions above 1080p.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found