OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£45VRAM:1 GBMemory bus width:?Thermal Design Power (TDP):?

EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

40%

6.7

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.7

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 62% of graphics cards
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

★Better than 97%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

44%

6.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.3

Power

11%

7.8

Features

5%

8.0

Design

4%

6.9

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 57%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £45
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB

Based on 216 owners sharing their experience in online comments

46%positive19%mixed35%negative

Owners value its basic display and video capabilities, but find its gaming performance too weak for modern titles.

What owners dislike

  • Runs most games after 2010 poorly, with low frame rates and very low settings needed even for titles that were current when the card came out.39
  • Frame rates often drop to 5 to 20 fps in newer games, and playable performance usually needs the lowest settings and a low resolution.31
  • Drivers often fail to install or the display shows no signal, and some owners report the card not being detected or switching unexpectedly.12
  • Performs worse than integrated graphics on many systems, and some owners found it slower than older cards like the GeForce 6600 GT.9
  • Only older games before about 2010 run well, while most newer titles are unplayable even at the lowest settings.7
  • Games show graphical glitches, missing textures and particle effects, and some models fail to render enemies or NPCs at normal settings.4
  • Video playback is limited to around 1080p at 30 fps on some models, and large or high-bitrate video files may fail to play.3
  • Some models overheat and shut down within minutes, and overclocking too far can cause a black screen that stops the card from posting.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

44%

6.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.3

Power

11%

7.8

Features

5%

8.0

Design

4%

6.9

Connectivity

6.7
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
?
PassMark (G3D) result
?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
FP32 performance
?
Show more
VRAM
1 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 1 GB of VRAM, which is less than 98.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
?
Memory bus width
?
Maximum memory bandwidth
?
Effective memory speed
?
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
?
PCIe lanes
?
DirectX version
?
Vulkan version
?
OpenGL version
?
Show more
Max displays supported
?
Max digital resolution
?
DisplayPort outputs
0
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 0 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 96.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
?
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
?
Power consumption while under peak load
?
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
?
PCIe power spec
?
Show more
Size
?
Length
?
Height
?
Slot width
?
Weight
227 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 227 g, which is lighter than 98.5% of Graphics cards.
Show more

EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 11.56x cheaper
    EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £520).
    £45 vs £520
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 7.5% better value for money
    EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.97 vs 7.4).
    7.97 vs 7.41
  • 77.6% lighter
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (227 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    227 g vs 1,014 g
  • 11.56x cheaper
    EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £520).
    £45 vs £520
  • 7.5% better value for money
    EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.97 vs 7.4).
    7.97 vs 7.41
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 77.6% lighter
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (227 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    227 g vs 1,014 g
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 72.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (520 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    520 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 3 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (0 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 3
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • 14.1% lower sentiment score
    6.7 vs 7.8
  • 14.1% lower sentiment score
    6.7 vs 7.8
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 72.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (520 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    520 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 3 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (0 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 3
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3

Third-party reviews

What customers like about EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB

  • An HDMI output connects a TV or monitor.
  • A DVI output connects older monitors.
  • At 227 g it is light and easy to move.
  • It can show 3D content.
  • Double precision floating point is supported for engineering software.
  • Overclocking is supported for those who want a little more speed.

What customers don't like about EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB

  • 1 GB of memory is too small for modern games.
  • No ray tracing support, so newer lighting effects are missing.
  • No DisplayPort output, so newer monitors may need an adapter.
  • Only one fan cools the card.
  • No mesh shaders or sampler feedback, so newer game techniques are missing.

Verdict

A basic display card is all the EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB is built for. It has 1 GB of memory and a 520 MHz base clock, so modern games are out of reach, and it has no ray tracing. What it does well is simple output. One HDMI port and one DVI port connect a monitor to an office PC, and it can show 3D content. At 227 g it is light to handle. There is no DisplayPort, so a newer monitor that only uses it will need an adapter. Double precision floating point is supported, which some engineering software relies on. It suits someone with an older desktop who needs a second screen or an extra port for everyday work, not gaming.

Compare EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce GT 210 1GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found