Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45VRAM:?Memory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):125 W

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 89% of graphics cards
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 85%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.1

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 87%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.1

Performance

24%

5.2

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

4.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
Floating-point performance
336 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 336 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 100% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
?
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR version
DDR3
This graphics card uses DDR3 memory, which is older than on 99.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 57.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2
This graphics card supports PCIe 2, which is older than on 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
11.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 11.1, which is older than on 99.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
N/A
OpenGL version
3.3
This graphics card supports OpenGL 3.3, which is older than on 99.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
2
This graphics card supports up to 2 displays, which is fewer than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
2560x1600
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 2560x1600, which is lower than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
0
This graphics card offers 0 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 97.3% of graphics cards and equal to 2.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
?
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 125 W, which is lower than that of 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
105 W
This graphics card draws 105 W under peak load, which is lower than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
400 W
This graphics card recommends a 400 W PSU, which is lower than that of 90.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
125 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 125 W, which is lower than that of 85.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
125 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
229 mm
This graphics card is 229 mm long, which is shorter than 81.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
544 g
This graphics card weighs 544 g, which is lighter than 89.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 41.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (125 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    125 W vs 215 W
  • 56 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (229 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    229 mm vs 285 mm
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (125 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    125 W vs 225 W
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 11.78x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £530).
    £45 vs £530
  • 11.78x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £530).
    £45 vs £530
  • 14.62x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (336 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    336 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:24 vs 1:64).
    1:24 vs 1:64
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 41.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (125 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    125 W vs 215 W
  • 44.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (125 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    125 W vs 225 W
  • 52.3% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (105 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    105 W vs 220 W
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 56 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (229 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    229 mm vs 285 mm
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 46.7% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (544 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    544 g vs 1,021 g
  • 13x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (65 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    65 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 68.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (600 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    600 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 128 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    56 vs 184
  • 91.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (33.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    33.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 87.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (57.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    57.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4.22x less popular
    NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 13.4% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.34 vs 7.2).
    6.34 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 68.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (600 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    600 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 128 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    56 vs 184
  • 91.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (33.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    33.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 94.1% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (9.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    9.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 98.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    0.34 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 4,240 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (112 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    112 vs 4,352
  • 87.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (57.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    57.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 90.5% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1800 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 48.6% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • Older GDDR version
    This graphics card uses an older GDDR version than the average graphics card (DDR3 vs GDDR6).
    DDR3 vs GDDR6
  • 13x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (65 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    65 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (2 vs 4).
    2.0 vs 4.0
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2008 vs 2023).
    July 2008
    2,008 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (11.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    11.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.1 vs 3).
    1.1 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (4 vs 6.8).
    4.0 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • Older OpenGL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (3.3 vs 4.6).
    3.3 vs 4.6
  • 96.7% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (754 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    754 million vs 22,900 million
  • 3 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (0 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (2 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    2 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.1).
    1.4 vs 2.1
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.1 vs 2.3).
    1.1 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (2560x1600 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    2560x1600 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 16 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (83 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    83 °C vs 67 °C
  • 39 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (39 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    39 dB vs 0 dB
  • 2.92x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (35 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    35 W vs 12 W
  • 17 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (54 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    54 °C vs 37 °C
  • 8.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (44 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    44 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
10/08/2009
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
18/11/2008
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
30/07/2008
Summary of the review
A
aphnetworks.com
26/09/2008
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
26/09/2008
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
08/03/2009
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
19/09/2012
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
14/09/2009
Summary of the review
P
phoronix.com
18/11/2008
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
20/10/2008
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
17/09/2008
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
04/08/2009
Summary of the review
P
pcgameshardware.de
28/04/2009
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
29/07/2008
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
19/10/2009
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

  • Excellent value for mid-range gaming, offering strong 'bang for the buck' during its peak
  • Strong performance in DirectX 9 and 10 titles, capable of smooth frame rates in games like Call of Duty 4
  • Broad hardware features including support for NVIDIA CUDA, PhysX, and PureVideo HD for media acceleration
  • Compatible with PCI-Express 2.0 and supports SLI configurations for multi-GPU performance scaling
  • Availability of varied aftermarket models with custom cooling solutions and factory overclocks

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

  • Essentially a rebranded GeForce 8800 GT with minimal technical updates, leading to some 'refresh' criticism
  • Lacks support for DirectX 11, 12, or Vulkan, making it incompatible with most modern gaming titles
  • Reference single-slot cooling designs can run hot, often reaching temperatures near 80°C under heavy load
  • Older 512 MB VRAM standard is insufficient for modern high-resolution textures
  • Stock cooling solutions from certain manufacturers were reported as notably loud

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT is a mid-range graphics card released in 2008, featuring 112 shading units, a 600 MHz core clock, and 512 MB or 1 GB of GDDR3 memory on a 256-bit bus. Based on the G92 architecture with 754 million transistors, it supports DirectX 10 (feature level 10_0) and offers technologies like PhysX, CUDA, and PureVideo HD for improved media acceleration. Its main strengths include a high 57.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, reliable performance for retro gaming at resolutions up to 1600x1200, and a flexible single-slot design. However, it lacks support for modern DirectX 11/12 APIs, consumes significant power with a 105W-125W TDP requiring a 6-pin connector, and is prone to thermal issues on older cooling solutions.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found