Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):145 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 89% of graphics cards
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

2.2

Performance

24%

3.8

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 91%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 87%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

2.2

Performance

24%

3.8

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

4.3
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
4,000 points
This graphics card scores 4,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 90.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
9,725 points
This graphics card scores 9,725 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 85.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
4,077 points
This graphics card scores 4,077 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 86.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
3.92 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 3.92 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 91% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
224.3 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 224.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 83.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
17.28 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 17.28 Gbps, which is slower than on 57.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
145 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 145 W, which is lower than that of 75.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
164 W
This graphics card draws 164 W under peak load, which is lower than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
148 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
890 g
This graphics card weighs 890 g, which is lighter than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (145 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    145 W vs 215 W
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 11.78x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £530).
    £45 vs £530
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 11.78x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£45 vs £530).
    £45 vs £530
  • 14% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.12 vs 8.000).
    9.12 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • 0.2% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1753 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,753 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 32.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (145 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    145 W vs 215 W
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 53% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1178 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,178 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 27 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (13 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    13 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 45.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1050 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,050 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 13.3% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.35 vs 7.2).
    6.35 vs 7.2
  • 53% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1178 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,178 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 27 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (13 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    13 vs 40
  • 45.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1050 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,050 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 67.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (122.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    122.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 80 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (104 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    104 vs 184
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 59.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (66 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    65.97 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 82.6% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    3.92 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 57.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (9725 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    9,725 points vs 22,653 points
  • 72.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (4000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    4,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 8 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (56 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    56 vs 64
  • 66.2% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (4077 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    4,077 points vs 12,074 points
  • 82.9% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (3.9 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    3.92 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 75% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.12 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,688 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,664 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,664 vs 4,352
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 63.2% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    7,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 49.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    224.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 95.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    1 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 9 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
    September 2014
    2,014 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 77.3% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (5200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    5,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • 34.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (398 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    398 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
    2.0 vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    1 vs 6
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 6.4 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.8 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.8 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
technuovo.com
29/10/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamesradar.com
16/04/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
09/04/2019
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
17/03/2015
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
18/10/2015
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
27/03/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
17/12/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
18/10/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
05/11/2014
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
12/12/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
29/09/2014
Summary of the review
N
nexthardware.com
30/09/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • Remains a highly cost-effective option for budget 1080p gaming in 2026, often found for under $50 USD on sites like eBay.
  • Efficient Maxwell architecture results in lower power consumption and heat output compared to older flagship cards.
  • Excellent overclocking potential allows many models to approach the performance of a stock GTX 980.
  • Reliable for eSports titles like Fortnite, Counter-Strike, and Valorant, where it can still maintain high frame rates.
  • Known for quiet operation, with many partner models from ASUS and MSI featuring passive cooling during low loads.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • Controversial 3.5GB + 0.5GB VRAM configuration causes performance stutters in modern games that exceed the initial 3.5GB limit.
  • Lacks modern features such as hardware-based Ray Tracing and DLSS, making it struggle with new AAA releases like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield.
  • Recent reports indicate that older units may suffer from fan failure or require thermal paste replacement after a decade of use.
  • Some older variants are prone to audible coil whine under heavy load.
  • Limited longevity for upcoming titles due to the aging 28nm architecture and lack of driver optimisations for new APIs.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 is a high-performance desktop graphics card based on the 28nm Maxwell architecture, featuring 1,664 CUDA cores, 104 texture mapping units, and a 145W–148W TDP. It typically operates with a base clock of 1050 MHz and a boost clock of 1178 MHz, offering 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface. Its primary pros include exceptional power efficiency for its era, strong 1080p gaming performance that often rivals previous flagship models, and support for modern features like DirectX 12 and HDMI 2.0 for 4K at 60Hz. However, its main con is a controversial memory design where only 3.5 GB of the VRAM runs at full speed while the final 0.5 GB operates at a significantly lower bandwidth, leading to potential stuttering in memory-intensive modern titles.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found