OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:96 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):70 W

ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB

5.1/10

▼Worse than 86% of graphics cards

6.3

▼Worse than 85%

4.7

▼Worse than 88%

8.5

▲Better than 72%

3.2
Gaming
Gaming
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.9
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
3.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.2
Video editing
Video editing
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
1.9
Floating-point performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.1
1080p
1080p
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.9
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
10.0%
3.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.9
1440p
1440p
2.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.9
Floating-point performance
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
15.0%
3.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.0
4K
4K
3.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.9
Floating-point performance
35.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
3.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB

5.1

Show more

Hide

Performance

2.8

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

2.8

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

9.4

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

6.4

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.5

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

70 W

Show more

Design

8.9

Show more

Hide

Size

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB vs the average graphics card

Why is ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

67.4% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (70 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
70 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
103 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (182 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
182 mm vs 285 mm
56 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
69 mm vs 125 mm
68.9% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (70 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
70 W vs 225 W
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
More compact card size
This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (182x69 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
182x69 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

6.9% higher user score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB
the average graphics card
ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.55 vs 8.000).
8.55 vs 8
2.3x cheaper
ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£230 vs £530).
£230 vs £530

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

67.4% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (70 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
70 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
68.9% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (70 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
70 W vs 225 W
14 °C lower load temperature
This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (53 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
53 °C vs 67 °C
68.2% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (70 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
70 W vs 220 W
50% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
6 W vs 12 W

103 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (182 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
182 mm vs 285 mm
56 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
69 mm vs 125 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
More compact card size
This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (182x69 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
182x69 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
68.2% lighter card weight
This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (325 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
325 g vs 1,021 g

Why is ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

38.6% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1537 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,537 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
160 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (96 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
96 bit vs 256 bit
6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
22 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
18 vs 40
45.7% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1042 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,042 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
112 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (72 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
72 vs 184
72.2% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (105.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
105.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3

13.4% worse value for money
ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.35 vs 7.2).
6.35 vs 7.2

38.6% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1537 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,537 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
22 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
18 vs 40
45.7% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1042 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,042 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
112 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (72 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
72 vs 184
72.2% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (105.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
105.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
22 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (18 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
18 vs 40
70.5% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (48.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
48.22 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
32 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
32 vs 64
69.3% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
6.94 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
72 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (72 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
72 vs 144
53.4% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (10553 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
10,553 points vs 22,653 points
67.9% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (4705 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
4,705 points vs 14,678.5 points
53.8% lower ray tracing score
This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4231 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
4,231 points vs 9,166 points
76.7% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (6.9 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
6.94 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
56.8% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5219 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
5,219 points vs 12,074 points
77.1% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.11 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
69.8% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.9 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
6.94 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS

160 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (96 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
96 bit vs 256 bit
6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
62.5% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (168 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
168 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
26.3% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
91.7% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
2 MB vs 24 MB

60% larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
8 nm vs 5 nm
Fewer PCIe lanes
This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
x8 vs x16
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
7 vs 8
62% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (8700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
8,700 million vs 22,900 million
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
1 fewer displays supported
This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
3 vs 4
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
5 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No fan stop
This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.

No backplate
This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB

No external power required; runs entirely off the PCIe slot power (70W TDP)
Compact low-profile design ideal for small form factor (SFF) and slim OEM PC builds
Supports modern NVIDIA technologies like DLSS for upscaling and Ray Tracing
Excellent for 1080p esports titles (e.g., Valorant, Fortnite) and light AAA gaming
Stays cool and quiet under load due to efficient dual-fan cooling and low power draw
Solid upgrade for older office PCs with limited power supplies

What we don't like about ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB

Significant performance reduction (approx. 18-20%) compared to the original 8GB 3050 model
Poor price-to-performance ratio compared to competitors like the RX 6600
6GB of VRAM and a 96-bit memory bus can cause bottlenecks in demanding AAA games
Struggles with modern titles at high settings or 1440p resolution
Lacks a backplate, leaving some PCB components exposed
Performance is closer to an older GTX 1660 Super rather than modern mid-tier cards

Verdict

The ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB is a compact, low-profile graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 2304 CUDA cores and an overclocked boost clock of 1537 MHz. It includes 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering a 168 GB/s bandwidth, and is designed with a durable stainless steel bracket and IP5X dust-resistant dual-ball bearing fans. Key advantages include its efficient 70W TDP that requires no external power connectors, legacy support via a DVI-D port alongside HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a, and its ability to fit into small form factor (SFF) builds while supporting DLSS and ray tracing. However, the card is limited by its cut-down 6GB VRAM and reduced memory bus compared to the standard 8GB model, which can struggle with demanding AAA titles at higher settings, and it lacks support for DLSS 3 frame generation.

Best alternatives

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 WINDFORCE OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 5050

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 7600 OC Edition V2

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC A580 Orc OC Edition

Graphics cards

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5050 Solo

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Ventus 2X OC

Graphics cards

PNY GeForce RTX 5050 Single Fan

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile

Graphics cards

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6600

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ASUS GeForce RTX 3050 LP BRK OC Edition 6GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found