Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Scosche Rhythm 24 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Battery life:1 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:3 m

Scosche Rhythm 24 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.1

Technical score

20%

6.4

User score

▼Worse than 97% of fitness-trackers
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.9

Battery

18%

4.5

Health

18%

4.2

Display

8%

3.6

Smart Features

8%

4.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

7.1

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 99% of fitness-trackers
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 87% of fitness-trackers
  • scosche-rhythm-24
  • scosche-rhythm-24
  • scosche-rhythm-24
  • scosche-rhythm-24
scosche-rhythm-24
scosche-rhythm-24
scosche-rhythm-24
scosche-rhythm-24

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Scosche Rhythm 24

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.9

Battery

18%

4.5

Health

18%

4.2

Display

8%

3.6

Smart Features

8%

4.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

7.1

Design & Durability

5.1
User score
User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.4
Popularity
Popularity
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Scosche Rhythm 24 has a popularity score of 4.2 points, which is lower than 53.5% of fitness trackers.
4.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Optical armband monitor.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
no
Activity reports
no
This fitness tracker does not support activity reports. 94.8% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
requires third-party app
Goal setting
no
Goal setting
no
This fitness tracker does not support goal setting. 98.1% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 30 m which is higher than that of 88.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9% of fitness trackers.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
This fitness tracker has NFC. 87.5% of fitness trackers have NFC.
NFC is for gym-equipment pairing.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Battery life
1 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 1 days which is shorter than that of 100% of fitness trackers.
About 24 hours of continuous use.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
24 h
Battery life in training mode
24 h
This fitness tracker offers a training-mode battery life of 24 h which is longer than that of 78.6% of fitness trackers.
Active sensor runtime.
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
armband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
29.2 mm
Show more

Scosche Rhythm 24 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.3% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
    Includes triathlon or duathlon workout support.
  • 16 h longer training-mode battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    24 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life in training mode than the average fitness tracker (24 h vs 8 h). The average fitness tracker has 8 h of battery life in training mode.
    Active sensor runtime.
    24 h vs 8 h
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
    NFC is for gym-equipment pairing.
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • Cadence sensor support
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Cadence sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.4% of fitness trackers support Cadence sensor.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Sensor works without account.
  • 16 h longer training-mode battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    24 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life in training mode than the average fitness tracker (24 h vs 8 h). The average fitness tracker has 8 h of battery life in training mode.
    Active sensor runtime.
    24 h vs 8 h
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
    NFC is for gym-equipment pairing.
  • ANT+ support
    ANT+ support
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports ANT+, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.3% of fitness trackers support ANT+.
    Supports ANT+ transmit and receive modes.
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Sensor works without account.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • 9 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (1 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    About 24 hours of continuous use.
    1 days vs 10 days
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
    requires third-party app
  • No goal setting
    Goal setting
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support goal setting, while the average fitness tracker does. 97.6% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
  • 17% worse value for money
    Scosche Rhythm 24 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (6.77 vs 7.9).
    6.77 vs 7.92
  • 24.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Scosche Rhythm 24
    the average fitness tracker
    Scosche Rhythm 24 has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.43 vs 8.000).
    6.43 vs 8
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 9 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (1 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    About 24 hours of continuous use.
    1 days vs 10 days
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 47 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    3 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (3 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    3 m vs 50 m
  • 2 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    13 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (13 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    13 mm vs 11 mm
  • 12% heavier
    Thickness
    28 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (28 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    28 g vs 25 g
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
    requires third-party app
  • No goal setting
    Goal setting
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support goal setting, while the average fitness tracker does. 97.6% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gadgetsandwearables.com
05/07/2018
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
09/01/2018
Summary of the review
U
utpalkumar.medium.com
10/04/2020
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
09/04/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/12/2018
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
19/07/2018
Summary of the review
F
fitness-tracker-test.info
18/10/2018
Summary of the review
N
nakan.ch
06/05/2019
Summary of the review
N
nakan.ch
29/04/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Scosche Rhythm 24

  • High accuracy in heart rate monitoring across various sports
  • Comfortable armband design compared to traditional chest straps
  • Dual-connectivity with support for both ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart devices
  • Long 24-hour battery life suitable for multi-day use
  • Color-coded LED indicator for real-time heart rate zone tracking
  • Onboard memory allows for recording data directly to the device without a phone
  • Waterproof (IP68) rating makes it suitable for swimming and heavy sweating

What we don't like about Scosche Rhythm 24

  • Companion mobile app is often described as clunky, archaic, or non-intuitive
  • Firmware update and data syncing/uploading can be unreliable or difficult to navigate
  • Device operation (button sequences) has a steep learning curve
  • Lacks the multi-device Bluetooth pairing found in some newer competitors
  • Physical sensor size is slightly bulky and less discreet than some rival bands

Verdict

The Scosche Rhythm 24 is a high-performance armband heart rate monitor featuring an IP68 waterproof rating for submersion up to 10 feet and a rechargeable battery providing 24 hours of continuous use. It utilizes a green and yellow optical sensor array for superior accuracy across all skin tones and includes dual-band ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart connectivity for compatibility with over 200 fitness apps and devices. Key advantages include 13 hours of onboard memory for phone-free workouts, specialized sports modes (including triathlon and swimming), and heart rate variability (HRV) tracking. However, some users have reported potential sync issues with specific Garmin devices and occasional inaccuracies in secondary metrics like cadence compared to dedicated sensors.

Compare Scosche Rhythm 24 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Scosche Rhythm 24 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found