Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Nike Fuelband Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Battery life:4 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Nike Fuelband Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.8

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

▼Worse than 99% of fitness-trackers
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

5.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

2.7

Battery

18%

3.3

Health

18%

6.3

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 99% of fitness-trackers
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on 150 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 85% of fitness-trackers
  • nike-fuelband
  • nike-fuelband
  • nike-fuelband
  • nike-fuelband
  • nike-fuelband
nike-fuelband
nike-fuelband
nike-fuelband
nike-fuelband
nike-fuelband

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Nike Fuelband

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

5.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

2.7

Battery

18%

3.3

Health

18%

6.3

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Design & Durability

4.8
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on 150 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nike Fuelband has a popularity score of 5.8 points, which is higher than 57.8% of fitness trackers.
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.2

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.6
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
?
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
2.1
Bluetooth version
2.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 2.1 which is older than in 95.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 1% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
4 days
Battery life
4 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 4 days which is shorter than that of 92.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
60 mAh
Battery capacity
60 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 60 mAh which is lower than that of 82.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
source range 50-70 mAh.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
LED matrix displays alphanumeric progress information.
Screen size
?
Display type
?
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

Nike Fuelband vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Nike+ Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Nike+ Connect.
  • 4.14 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    6.86 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (6.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    6.86 mm vs 11 mm
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses NikeFuel.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 21.8 mm lower height
    Height
    19 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (19 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    19 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Nike+ Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Nike+ Connect.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 4.14 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    6.86 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (6.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    6.86 mm vs 11 mm
  • 21.8 mm lower height
    Height
    19 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (19 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    19 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses NikeFuel.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (4 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    4 days vs 10 days
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support distance tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 95.8% of fitness trackers support distance tracking.
  • 20.1% worse value for money
    Nike Fuelband has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (6.59 vs 7.9).
    6.59 vs 7.92
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Nike Fuelband is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 18.1% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nike Fuelband
    the average fitness tracker
    Nike Fuelband has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.77 vs 8.000).
    6.77 vs 8
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (4 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    4 days vs 10 days
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 45.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    60 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (60 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    source range 50-70 mAh.
    60 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Not compatible with Android
    Compatible with Android
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with Android, while the average fitness tracker is. 98.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with Android.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    2.1
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (2.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    2.1 vs 4.0
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • Limited firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    USB
    This fitness tracker uses a less convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    USB vs over-the-air
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 8% heavier
    Thickness
    27 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (27 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Weight varies by size.
    27 g vs 25 g
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2012 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    February 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
geardiary.com
25/04/2012
Summary of the review
H
huffingtonpost.co.uk
20/06/2012
Summary of the review
I
independent.co.uk
21/02/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
09/05/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
26/03/2012
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
02/10/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/06/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
29/01/2013
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
02/01/2013
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
17/10/2012
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
22/08/2012
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
01/05/2012
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
13/04/2012
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
08/03/2012
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
03/04/2014
Summary of the review
F
flitz-piepen.de
25/04/2013
Summary of the review
S
sports-insider.de
12/05/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/07/2013
Summary of the review
A
annedubndidu.com
18/12/2013
Summary of the review
I
igen.fr
07/04/2014
Summary of the review
S
sportbuzzbusiness.fr
30/10/2013
Summary of the review
C
commeuncamion.com
30/11/2013
Summary of the review
M
madmoizelle.com
16/10/2013
Summary of the review
L
lokan.fr
21/08/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/09/2012
Summary of the review
E
experience2geek.com
03/06/2013
Summary of the review
G
gonzague.me
30/12/2013
Summary of the review
T
tecnetico.com
29/03/2012
Summary of the review
B
bright.nl
08/11/2012
Summary of the review
I
iculture.nl
17/07/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 150 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Nike Fuelband

  • Sleek and attractive retro-futuristic LED dot matrix display
  • Sturdy build quality with a robust USB charging clasp
  • Highly motivating social features and community leaderboard integration
  • Easy to use with a simple one-button interface
  • Effective gamification through NikeFuel points and virtual awards
  • Water-resistant design suitable for wearing in the shower
  • Seamless wireless syncing over Bluetooth (SE model)

What we don't like about Nike Fuelband

  • Lack of GPS, making it less useful for serious runners tracking distance
  • Inaccurate tracking for activities like cycling, yoga, and weightlifting
  • Does not include a heart rate monitor or sleep tracking capabilities
  • Relatively high price point compared to trackers with more features
  • Wrist-based accelerometer can be 'cheated' by just waving arms
  • Bulky design can be uncomfortable while typing or wearing under shirt cuffs
  • Proprietary 'NikeFuel' metric can be confusing and lacks real-world meaning for some users
  • No vibration motor for silent alarms or subtle movement reminders

Verdict

The Nike+ FuelBand is a sleek, wrist-worn activity tracker featuring a 3-axis accelerometer and an ambient light-sensing LED display composed of 100 white and 20 color-coded lights. Weighing approximately 30g and available in various sizes (S, M/L, XL), it tracks steps, calories, time, and 'NikeFuel'—a proprietary metric designed to measure whole-body movement across different activities. Key strengths include its integrated USB charging/syncing plug, water-resistant build (safe for showers), and a motivational 'red-to-green' progress bar that gamifies daily goals. However, the device has notable drawbacks: it lacks a sleep tracker, cannot accurately monitor activities with stable arm positions like cycling or yoga, is not waterproof for swimming, and the proprietary Fuel metric can feel vague or inconsistent compared to traditional health data.

Compare Nike Fuelband with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nike Fuelband and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found