OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Lenovo HX06 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Battery life:8 daysScreen size:0.87 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Lenovo HX06 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 72% of fitness-trackers
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

20%

7.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

5.5

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

7.7

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 72% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £9

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Lenovo HX06

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

20%

7.4

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

5.5

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

7.7

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

6.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Lenovo HX06 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
▼ Worse than 60% of models
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
▼ Worse than 35% of models
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
▼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
▼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
▼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
▼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
▲ Better than 60% of models
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
▼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <8 m – >23 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
8 days
Battery life
8 days
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 8 days which is shorter than that of 51.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
60 mAh
Battery capacity
60 mAh
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 60 mAh which is lower than that of 82.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.87 inch
Screen size
0.87 inch
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.87 inch which is smaller than that of 75.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
32x 128
Screen resolution
32x 128
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 32x128 which is lower than that of 61.4% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
152 ppi
Pixel density
152 ppi
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 152 ppi which is lower than that of 86.1% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
▲ Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
22 mm
Show more

Lenovo HX06 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Built-in gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Lenovo HX06 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • 29.8 mm lower height
    Height
    11 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (11 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    11 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    ▲ Better than 47% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Lenovo HX06 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 29.8 mm lower height
    Height
    11 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (11 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    11 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    ▲ Better than 47% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    ▲ Better than 4% of models
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    32 x 128
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (32x128 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    32x128 vs 194x368
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 45.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    60 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (60 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    60 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 38% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    152 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (152 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    152 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 0.17 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.87 inch
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.9 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.87 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Lenovo HX06 has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 5.2% worse value for money
    Lenovo HX06 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.53 vs 7.9).
    7.53 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 45.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    60 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (60 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    60 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 2 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 days
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (8 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    8 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    32 x 128
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (32x128 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    32x128 vs 194x368
  • 38% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    152 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (152 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    152 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 0.17 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.87 inch
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.9 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.87 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gogi.in
06/07/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo HX06 unboxing and review – is it worth for Rs. 1,299?
F
futurefive.co.nz
20/09/2018
Summary of the review
Hands-on Review: Lenovo HX06, The fitness band that won’t break the bank
C
china-gadgets.de
30/06/2019
Summary of the review
Lenovo HX06H fitness tracker for €15.81 – China Gadgets
(Translated)Show original
T
therunningpitt.com
29/06/2019
Summary of the review
Lenovo Smartband HX06H, the review", "Lenovo HX06: the affordable but high-quality smartband! The review", "Lenovo HX06 Review: an affordable and esse...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Lenovo HX06

  • Highly affordable and budget-friendly price point
  • Convenient built-in USB connector for direct charging without cables
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for daily wear
  • IP67 water resistance allows for use in the shower
  • Includes useful 'Find My Phone' vibration feature
  • Provides essential notifications for calls and basic app alerts

What we don't like about Lenovo HX06

  • Lacks a heart rate sensor for cardiac monitoring
  • Battery life is frequently reported as poor, often lasting only 1–4 days
  • The companion 'Lenovo Healthy' app is basic and lacks advanced features
  • Significant reliability concerns with reports of units failing within a week
  • Step and sleep tracking accuracy has been noted as inconsistent or unreliable
  • OLED display is very basic and may be difficult to read in some conditions

Verdict

The Lenovo HX06 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 0.87-inch OLED monochrome display (128 x 32 pixels) and a skin-friendly, interchangeable silicone strap. It connects via Bluetooth 4.2 to the Lenovo Healthy app and offers core tracking for steps, distance, calories, and sleep, along with an IP67 water-resistance rating. Its primary advantages include a convenient built-in USB charging plug that eliminates the need for cables, a lightweight 20g design, and helpful alerts like sedentary and 'anti-sleep' reminders. However, it lacks a heart rate sensor, and users have frequently reported issues with limited outdoor display visibility, basic app functionality, and inconsistent battery life compared to its advertised 8-day standby.

Compare Lenovo HX06 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo HX06 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found