OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Hama Fit Track 6910 review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Battery life:6 daysScreen size:1.28 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:yesWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Hama Fit Track 6910 Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Hama Fit Track 6910
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

35%

7.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 53% of fitness trackers
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

20%

8.3

Sports

20%

5.1

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.4

Display

8%

8.6

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design

â–²Better than 66%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
  • hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
hama-fit-track-6910
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #87 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Hama Fit Track 6910

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

20%

8.3

Sports

20%

5.1

Battery

18%

7.8

Health

18%

7.4

Display

8%

8.6

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design

7.3
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
yes
This fitness tracker has GPS. 87.8% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
GPS
This fitness tracker supports GPS satellite systems which is more versatile than that of 86.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 2.9% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 68% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 17.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
6 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 6 days which is shorter than that of 78.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is higher than that of 95.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.28 inch
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.28 inch which is larger than that of 66.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.3% of fitness trackers.
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 64.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 6.4% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
240x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 240x240 which is higher than that of 83.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
265 ppi
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 265 ppi which is higher than that of 53% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
?
Band width
20 mm
Show more

Hama Fit Track 6910 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 2.4x larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Built-in GPS
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.6% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • Smart alarm
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 30.8% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Route support
    This fitness tracker supports route guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.4% of fitness trackers support route guidance.
  • 0.22 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.3 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.28 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Built-in GPS
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.6% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • Route support
    This fitness tracker supports route guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.4% of fitness trackers support route guidance.
  • 2.4x larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 0.22 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.3 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.28 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5.0 vs 4.1
  • Smart alarm
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 30.8% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • 4 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (6 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    6 days vs 10 days
  • 3.67x heavier
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (88 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    88 g vs 24 g
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 1 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12 mm vs 11 mm
  • 6.68 mm greater height
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (48 mm vs 41.3 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 41.325 mm.
    48 mm vs 41.325 mm
  • 4 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (6 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    6 days vs 10 days
  • 3.67x heavier
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (88 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    88 g vs 24 g
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 1 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12 mm vs 11 mm
  • 6.68 mm greater height
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (48 mm vs 41.3 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 41.325 mm.
    48 mm vs 41.325 mm

Third-party reviews

What we like about Hama Fit Track 6910

  • GPS and a route tracker record where you have been.
  • Heart rate and blood oxygen sensors are both built in.
  • A 1.5 hour charge is quick to top up.
  • The metal case adds durability for daily wear.
  • Vibrating alerts and notifications reach you on the wrist.
  • The IP68 rating keeps out dust and handles rain and showers.

What we don't like about Hama Fit Track 6910

  • The rated life of 6 days is short for a band with GPS on.
  • At 88 g it is heavy for all-day wear and sleep tracking.
  • The 1 m depth rating rules out swimming in deep water.
  • The 1.28 inch screen is small for reading route data.
  • Galileo support is missing, so positioning uses GPS alone.

Verdict

Built-in GPS and a route tracker are the reason to look at the Hama Fit Track 6910, a metal-cased band with a 1.28 inch color screen. Heart rate, blood oxygen and sleep tracking cover the health side, along with steps and calories. The 300 mAh battery charges in 1.5 hours, but the rated life is 6 days, so expect to charge it about once a week. The 88 g weight is noticeable on the wrist, and the 1 m depth rating limits it to splashes and shallow water. The touchscreen shows notifications, vibrating alerts reach you without a sound, and the band works with both Android and iOS. It suits a walker or runner who wants route tracking and health data in one band and does not mind charging it weekly.

Compare Hama Fit Track 6910 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hama Fit Track 6910 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found