Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Alta HR Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Battery life:7 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Fitbit Alta HR Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical score

20%

9.0

User score

▲Better than 62% of fitness-trackers
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

8.3

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

▲Better than 51% of fitness-trackers
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,106 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 91% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-alta-hr
  • fitbit-alta-hr
  • fitbit-alta-hr
  • fitbit-alta-hr
  • fitbit-alta-hr
fitbit-alta-hr
fitbit-alta-hr
fitbit-alta-hr
fitbit-alta-hr
fitbit-alta-hr

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Alta HR

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

8.3

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.1

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

7.0
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,106 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Alta HR has a popularity score of 9.4 points, which is higher than 83.1% of fitness trackers.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

8.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
?
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
6 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
6 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 6 m which is lower than that of 94% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.8% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
?
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
45 mAh
Battery capacity
45 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 45 mAh which is lower than that of 90.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 36
Screen resolution
128x 36
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x36 which is higher than that of 49.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.6% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15 mm
Show more

Fitbit Alta HR vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
    Cardio Fitness Score.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • 12.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Alta HR
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Alta HR has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.98 vs 8.000).
    8.98 vs 8
  • 85.7% more popular
    Fitbit Alta HR has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.41 vs 5.1).
    9.41 vs 5.07
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
    Cardio Fitness Score.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 36
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x36 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x36 vs 194x368
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 59.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    45 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (45 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    45 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 1.7 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.7 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.7 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.7 mm vs 11 mm
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Fitbit Alta HR is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 4 m shorter Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    6 m
    This fitness tracker has a shorter Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (6 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    6 m vs 10 m
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Fitbit Alta HR is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 59.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    45 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (45 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    45 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 36
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x36 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x36 vs 194x368
  • 4 m shorter Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    6 m
    This fitness tracker has a shorter Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (6 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    6 m vs 10 m
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 1.7 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.7 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.7 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.7 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
neilturner.me.uk
11/07/2017
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
05/04/2017
Summary of the review
M
macworld.com
26/03/2017
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
15/05/2017
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
20/01/2021
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
01/07/2019
Summary of the review
C
coachweb.com
21/11/2018
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
21/11/2018
Summary of the review
K
kit.honestjohn.co.uk
22/10/2018
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
13/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
11/04/2017
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
30/03/2017
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
27/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
27/03/2017
Summary of the review
M
mashable.com
27/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
23/08/2017
Summary of the review
I
irishtimes.com
06/07/2017
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
21/04/2017
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
27/03/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
27/07/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
11/05/2017
Summary of the review
F
fitnessarmband.eu
26/05/2021
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
24/06/2018
Summary of the review
S
stern.de
04/08/2017
Summary of the review
F
fitness-tracker-test.info
05/08/2017
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
09/05/2018
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
19/05/2017
Summary of the review
L
leparisien.fr
13/04/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
N/A
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/04/2017
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
17/04/2028
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
17/03/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
03/05/2017
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
03/08/2017
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
24/07/2017
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
25/03/2019
Summary of the review
N
nextgentech.it
03/07/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
29/10/2018
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
20/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
test-aankoop.be
Unknown
Summary of the review
S
salamistinkt.nl
13/02/2019
Summary of the review
F
fitwithmarit.nl
18/02/2018
Summary of the review
B
bright.nl
26/07/2017
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
20/04/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 7,106 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Alta HR

  • Slim and stylish design, suitable for all-day wear and smaller wrists
  • Continuous heart rate tracking via PurePulse technology
  • In-depth sleep tracking and actionable sleep stage insights
  • Long battery life, typically lasting up to 7 days per charge
  • Wide variety of interchangeable bands for customisation
  • Seamless integration with the highly-rated Fitbit app platform
  • Improved buckle-style strap for a more secure fit compared to previous models

What we don't like about Fitbit Alta HR

  • Not waterproof or swim-proof; only resistant to sweat and rain
  • Lack of built-in or connected GPS for accurate distance tracking
  • Small monochrome display can be difficult to read in bright sunlight
  • Touch-sensitive screen is sometimes unresponsive or requires firm taps
  • No altimeter to track floors climbed
  • Inability to manually start or stop specific workouts directly from the device
  • Proprietary charging cable is not compatible with other Fitbit models

Verdict

The Fitbit Alta HR is a slim fitness tracker measuring 35.8mm x 15.2mm x 10mm and weighing approximately 23g, designed for 24/7 wear with a surgical-grade stainless steel case and a 1.1-inch monochrome OLED tap display. Key specifications include an optical heart rate monitor with PurePulse technology, a 3-axis accelerometer, and a lithium-polymer battery providing up to 7 days of life on a 2-hour charge. Main characteristics feature automatic exercise recognition through SmartTrack, advanced sleep stage monitoring (Light, Deep, REM), and smartphone notifications for calls, texts, and calendar alerts via Bluetooth 4.0. Its primary pros are its lightweight, stylish form factor with interchangeable bands and impressive battery longevity compared to similar wearables. However, notable cons include its lack of built-in GPS and altimeter, limited splash-resistant rating that makes it unsuitable for swimming, and an occasionally unresponsive tap-activated screen.

Compare Fitbit Alta HR with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Alta HR and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found