Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Alta Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Battery life:5 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Fitbit Alta Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.4

Technical score

20%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 57% of fitness-trackers
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.8

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.4

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 73% of fitness-trackers
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 4,986 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 79% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
  • fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta
fitbit-alta

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Alta

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.8

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.4

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

6.4
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 4,986 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Alta has a popularity score of 9.1 points, which is higher than 80.3% of fitness trackers.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.8
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
no Galileo satellite support.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
?
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 30 m which is higher than that of 88.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
36 mAh
Battery capacity
36 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 36 mAh which is lower than that of 94.1% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 36
Screen resolution
128x 36
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x36 which is higher than that of 49.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.6% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15 mm
Show more

Fitbit Alta vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • 23 more stored activities
    Max stored activities
    30
    This fitness tracker has more stored activities than the average fitness tracker (30 vs 7). The average fitness tracker stores 7 activities.
    30 vs 7
  • 5.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Alta
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Alta has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.46 vs 8.000).
    8.46 vs 8
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 36
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x36 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x36 vs 194x368
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 67.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    36 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (36 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    36 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 16% heavier
    Thickness
    29 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (29 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    29 g vs 25 g
  • 71.4% more expensive
    Fitbit Alta is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£120 vs £70).
    £120 vs £70
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 67.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    36 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (36 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    36 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 36
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x36 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x36 vs 194x368
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 16% heavier
    Thickness
    29 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (29 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    29 g vs 25 g
  • 1.19 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.19 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.2 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.19 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
sixmilestosupper.com
05/07/2018
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/03/2016
Summary of the review
K
kickbacktimes.co.uk
07/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
time.com
25/03/2016
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
20/04/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
12/03/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
11/05/2016
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
26/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
11/01/2017
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
18/03/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
21/11/2018
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
25/03/2016
Summary of the review
S
smartwatch.de
Datum unbekannt
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
15/09/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitness-tracker-test.info
31/08/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
30/05/2016
Summary of the review
G
gedankenfunken.de
14/04/2017
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
05/06/2016
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
07/08/2016
Summary of the review
D
darty.com
19/05/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
07/06/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/04/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
02/06/2016
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
05/06/2016
Summary of the review
N
nextgentech.it
07/04/2026
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
02/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
cynthia.nl
21/04/2017
Summary of the review
I
ikbenirisniet.nl
05/05/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,986 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Alta

  • Slim and stylish design that is more aesthetically pleasing than typical bulky fitness trackers
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting between 5 to 7 days on a single charge
  • Automatic exercise recognition (SmartTrack) that accurately logs activities like walking and running
  • Interchangeable bands allow for high customisation with various colours and materials
  • Comprehensive and user-friendly Fitbit companion app with strong social and motivational features
  • Helpful 'reminders to move' that encourage activity throughout the day
  • Basic smartphone notifications for calls, texts, and calendar alerts

What we don't like about Fitbit Alta

  • Lack of a heart rate sensor, which limits accuracy for intense workouts and calorie burn
  • No built-in GPS or altimeter, meaning it cannot track elevation or map routes without a phone
  • Tapping interface can be finicky and sometimes requires significant force to register
  • Not waterproof; it is only resistant to sweat and rain and cannot be worn for swimming or in the shower
  • The screen is difficult to read in direct sunlight and is prone to scratching
  • Uses a proprietary, somewhat bulky clamp-style charger that is not compatible with other Fitbit models
  • Text notifications can be hard to read on the small screen as they scroll only once and may truncate

Verdict

The Fitbit Alta is a slim, stylish fitness tracker featuring a 128 x 36 pixel OLED tap display, a 3-axis accelerometer for tracking steps, distance, and calories, and a lithium-polymer battery that lasts up to 5 days on a 2-hour charge. Its main characteristics include SmartTrack for automatic exercise recognition, vibration-based silent alarms, and basic smartphone notifications for calls, texts, and calendar alerts. A major pro is its modular design with interchangeable bands in various materials like silicone, leather, and stainless steel, making it one of the most aesthetic and unobtrusive wearables in its class. However, notable cons include the lack of a heart rate monitor or GPS, a screen that can be difficult to read in direct sunlight, and a tap-sensitive interface that is sometimes unresponsive or finicky.

Compare Fitbit Alta with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Alta and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found