Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Adidas Micoach Fit Smart Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Battery life:5 daysScreen size:0.8 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:30 m

Adidas Micoach Fit Smart Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical score

20%

6.2

User score

▼Worse than 92% of fitness-trackers
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.6

Battery

18%

4.6

Health

18%

5.7

Display

8%

4.3

Smart Features

8%

8.4

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

5.2

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 92% of fitness-trackers
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 90% of fitness-trackers
  • adidas-micoach-fit-smart
  • adidas-micoach-fit-smart
  • adidas-micoach-fit-smart
adidas-micoach-fit-smart
adidas-micoach-fit-smart
adidas-micoach-fit-smart

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Adidas Micoach Fit Smart

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.6

Battery

18%

4.6

Health

18%

5.7

Display

8%

4.3

Smart Features

8%

8.4

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

5.2

Design & Durability

5.8
User score
User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.2
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Adidas Micoach Fit Smart has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is higher than 50.7% of fitness trackers.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.0
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
5 h
Battery life in training mode
5 h
This fitness tracker offers a training-mode battery life of 5 h which is shorter than that of 71.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.4% of fitness trackers.
Can exceed 5 hours.
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
200 mAh
Battery capacity
200 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 200 mAh which is higher than that of 78.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.8 inch
Screen size
0.8 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.8 inch which is smaller than that of 79.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
LED matrix display.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
34 mm
Show more

Adidas Micoach Fit Smart vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • 3 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    3
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (3 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Built-in GPS route tracking.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Works with external heart rate monitors
    Compatible with external heart rate monitors
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with external heart rate monitors, while the average fitness tracker is not. 5.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with external heart rate monitors.
  • Live tracking
    Live tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports live tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.6% of fitness trackers support live tracking.
    Via miCoach app live progress sharing.
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • 3 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    3
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (3 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • Firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    over-the-air / USB
    This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
    Official service discontinued.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 2.32x heavier
    Thickness
    58 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (58 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    58 g vs 25 g
  • No silent alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • 0.24 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.8 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    LED matrix display.
    0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 2.57x more expensive
    Adidas Micoach Fit Smart is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£180 vs £70).
    £180 vs £70
  • 13.4% worse value for money
    Adidas Micoach Fit Smart has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (6.98 vs 7.9).
    6.98 vs 7.92
  • 29.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Adidas Micoach Fit Smart
    the average fitness tracker
    Adidas Micoach Fit Smart has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.19 vs 8.000).
    6.19 vs 8
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 h shorter training-mode battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    5 h
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in training mode than the average fitness tracker (5 h vs 8 h). The average fitness tracker has 8 h of battery life in training mode.
    Can exceed 5 hours.
    5 h vs 8 h
  • 0.24 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.8 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    LED matrix display.
    0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 2.32x heavier
    Thickness
    58 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (58 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    58 g vs 25 g
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 2 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    3 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (3 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    3 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 20 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 1 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12 mm vs 11 mm
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gadfit.com
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
01/10/2014
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
20/10/2015
Summary of the review
T
talesofanniebean.com
11/05/2015
Summary of the review
M
mattmarenic.medium.com
17/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
22/01/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
05/01/2015
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
12/02/2015
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
05/11/2015
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
21/08/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Adidas Micoach Fit Smart

  • Integrated optical heart rate sensor eliminates the need for a chest strap
  • Real-time color-coded LED strip provides instant feedback on workout intensity zones
  • Lightweight and comfortable soft-touch silicone band for long workouts
  • Includes access to extensive training plans and guided weekly goals via the app
  • Solid battery life that can last up to 5–10 days depending on workout frequency
  • Intuitive physical button navigation which is easier to use with sweaty hands than touchscreens
  • Accurate stride-based distance tracking for indoor treadmill use without GPS

What we don't like about Adidas Micoach Fit Smart

  • Lacks built-in GPS, requiring a tethered smartphone for accurate outdoor distance and pace
  • Dot-matrix LED display can be difficult to read in direct sunlight
  • Silicone material is prone to attracting dust and dirt over time
  • Occasional heart rate signal dropouts during high-intensity movements
  • Limited everyday activity features as it lacks sleep tracking and phone notifications
  • Inaccurate daily step counting when used as a casual pedometer compared to dedicated trackers
  • Proprietary magnetic charging cradle is required for recharging

Verdict

The Adidas miCoach Fit Smart is a fitness-focused training band featuring a 17x11 LED matrix display, an integrated Mio optical heart rate sensor, and a 3-axis accelerometer. Designed primarily for active workouts rather than all-day tracking, it measures intensity via a unique color-coded LED side bar that corresponds to heart rate zones (blue, green, yellow, and red). Key pros include its highly accurate wrist-based heart rate monitoring, comfortable sweatproof silicone construction, and robust coaching integration through the miCoach app. However, the device lacks built-in GPS, requiring a tethered smartphone for precise distance and pace tracking, and its bulky design may feel oversized on smaller wrists.

Compare Adidas Micoach Fit Smart with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Adidas Micoach Fit Smart and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found