OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Acer Liquid Leap Fit review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£90Battery life:5 daysScreen size:1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Acer Liquid Leap Fit Review: Compare 163 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

35%

7.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 60% of fitness trackers
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 64%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components

20%

7.7

Sports

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

7.5

Health

18%

6.8

Display

8%

7.3

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

8.6

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Design

▲Better than 50%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £90
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Acer Liquid Leap Fit

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components:

20%

7.7

Sports

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

7.5

Health

18%

6.8

Display

8%

7.3

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

8.6

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Design

7.0
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
?
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
?
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 59.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.7% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 64% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Smart Coach support.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 4.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 47% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 81.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 11% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1 inch
Market range: <0.72 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1 inch which is smaller than that of 52.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.9% of fitness trackers.
Display type
PMOLED
This fitness tracker uses PMOLED display technology which is less advanced than that of 51.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 6.8% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 32
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 50.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 8.2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
?
Band width
?
Show more

Acer Liquid Leap Fit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Smart Coach support.
  • Call control
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 26.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Apple Silicon Macs only.
  • Water intake tracking
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.9% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes hydration reminders.
  • EDA sensor
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Galvanic skin response sensor.
  • Sweat tracking
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.8% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • 16.7% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    20 g vs 24 g
  • EDA sensor
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Galvanic skin response sensor.
  • Sweat tracking
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.8% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 26.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Apple Silicon Macs only.
  • Call control
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 16.7% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    20 g vs 24 g
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Smart Coach support.
  • Water intake tracking
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.9% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes hydration reminders.
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • No shock resistance standard
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810H). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810H shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810H
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4 vs 4.1
  • 28.6% more expensive
    Acer Liquid Leap Fit is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£90 vs £70).
    £90 vs £70
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 0.06 inch smaller screen size
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4 vs 4.1
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • No shock resistance standard
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810H). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810H shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810H
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No achievements
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.4% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Acer Liquid Leap Fit

  • Impressive battery life for a device with continuous heart rate monitoring
  • Lightweight and comfortable design (approx. 20 grams)
  • Competitively priced compared to rivals
  • IPX7-certified waterproofing (safe for showers and rain)
  • Includes basic smartwatch features like music controls and phone notifications
  • Attractive aesthetic with a variety of interchangeable band colors

What customers don't like about Acer Liquid Leap Fit

  • Touchscreen interface is often unresponsive or requires multiple taps to wake
  • Heart rate monitor can be unreliable or struggle to find a reading
  • Charging requires a 'fiddly' external plastic cradle/cage
  • Very basic fitness tracking metrics with no GPS or altimeter
  • The rubber strap can be tricky to fasten securely on the wrist
  • Monochrome OLED screen is small with relatively thick bezels

Verdict

The Acer Liquid Leap Fit is a slim, water-resistant fitness tracker (IPX7 rated) featuring a 1-inch monochrome OLED touchscreen and a dedicated continuous heart rate monitor. It excels at core health metrics, providing 24/7 tracking for steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep patterns, while also offering unique stress sensors and health-oriented reminders for tasks like drinking water or taking medication. Key pros include its impressive one-week battery life and broad compatibility across Android, iOS, and Windows Phone platforms. However, notable drawbacks include a basic and sometimes sluggish user interface, a lack of built-in GPS or altimeter for advanced outdoor tracking, and a button-free design that can be difficult to wake up with gestures.

Compare Acer Liquid Leap Fit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Liquid Leap Fit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found