Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Mamiya ZD Back Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£6,860Sensor size:medium formatWeight:450 gBattery life (CIPA):260 shots

Mamiya ZD Back Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.7

Overall score

Score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.7

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 97% of cameras
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.7

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.3

Display & Design

8%

5.1

Battery & Power

7%

3.6

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 92% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £6,860

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Mamiya ZD Back

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.7

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.3

Display & Design

8%

5.1

Battery & Power

7%

3.6

Connectivity & Storage

3.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Mamiya ZD Back has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
2.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.7

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

2.9
Sensor size
medium format
Sensor size
medium format
This camera uses a sensor classified as medium format; it is larger than the sensor in 97.9% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 2.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
21.8 MP
Main camera megapixels
21.8 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 21.8 MP, which is higher than that of 75.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
9 µm
Main camera pixel size
9 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 9 µm, which are larger than those in 100% of cameras.
Base ISO
50
Base ISO
50
This camera has a base ISO of 50 which is lower than that of 99.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 400, which is lower than that of 99.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
3
N. of focus points
3
This camera has 3 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 94.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
?
Weight
450 g
Weight
450 g
This camera weighs 450 g which is heavier than 57% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.4% of cameras.
Width
106 mm
Width
106 mm
This camera has a width of 106 mm which is narrower than 72.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Height
90 mm
Height
90 mm
This camera has a height of 90 mm which is taller than 66.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Thickness
64 mm
Thickness
64 mm
This camera has a thickness of 64 mm which is thicker than 59.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
260 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
260 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 260 shots, which is shorter than that of 69.9% of cameras and equal to that of 2.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,500 mAh
Battery capacity
1,500 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 72.2% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Mamiya ZD Back vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 5.66 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    9 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    9 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    medium format
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (medium format vs APS-C).
    medium format vs APS-C
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    CF and SD slots
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    21.8 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (21.8 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    21.8 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 380 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,500 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1500 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,500 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF vs SD
  • 13.9 mm narrower
    Width
    106 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (106 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    106 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 13.9 mm narrower
    Width
    106 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (106 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    106 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 5.66 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    9 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    9 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    medium format
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (medium format vs APS-C).
    medium format vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    21.8 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (21.8 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    21.8 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 380 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,500 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1500 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,500 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    CF and SD slots
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF vs SD
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 4.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1.2 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    1.8 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.8 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    1.8 in vs 3 in
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 23.66x more expensive
    Mamiya ZD Back is more expensive than the average camera (£6,860 vs £290).
    £6,860 vs £290
  • 2.12x worse value for money
    Mamiya ZD Back has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (2.92 vs 6.2).
    2.92 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Mamiya ZD Back is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 1.2 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    1.8 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.8 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    1.8 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 2 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    98 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (98 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    98 % vs 100 %
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 55 g heavier
    Weight
    450 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (450 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    450 g vs 395 g
  • 16.1 mm taller body
    Height
    90 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (90 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    90 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 18 mm thicker
    Thickness
    64 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (64 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    64 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 6,000 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    400 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 598 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    245 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (245 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    245 points vs 843 points
  • 9 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    64 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (64 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    64 points vs 73 points
  • 7 older
    Release date
    2006
    This camera is older than the average camera (2006 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    2,006 vs 2,013
  • 0.7 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.7 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 4.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 20 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    3
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (3 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    3 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Focus control depends on the attached camera body.
  • No two-stage shutter
    Two-stage shutter button
    no
    This camera does not have a two-stage shutter button, the average camera does.
    No integrated camera-body shutter button.
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 70 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    260 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (260 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    260 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

K
kristoffertrolle.com
12/05/2024
Summary of the review
1
16-9.net
11/01/2018
Summary of the review
P
pebbleplace.com
28/10/2018
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
13/01/2009
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
13/01/2009
Summary of the review
1
16-9.net
Undated
Summary of the review
G
gosebru.ch
No Date Provided
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
19/01/2008
Summary of the review
G
galerie-photo.com
date de revue non précisée
Summary of the review
G
galerie-photo.com
date de revue non précisée
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/09/2008
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Mamiya ZD Back

  • Exceptional color rendering, often described as having a 'filmic' or 'Kodak Portra' look.
  • Large 22MP CCD sensor (36x48mm) provides a distinct medium format aesthetic and high detail at low ISOs.
  • User-friendly ergonomics with dedicated physical buttons and a simple control layout.
  • Flexible raw files that perform well in modern processors like Capture One.
  • Unique features like an exchangeable IR cut filter for infrared photography.
  • Affordable entry point into medium format digital photography compared to contemporary alternatives.

What we don't like about Mamiya ZD Back

  • Poor high ISO performance; images generally become unusable above ISO 100-200.
  • Extremely slow operation, including long buffer clearing times and sluggish menu navigation.
  • Dated, low-resolution 1.8-inch rear LCD screen that is nearly useless for judging focus or exposure.
  • Severe noise issues during exposures longer than a few seconds.
  • Poor JPEG quality; users strongly recommend shooting exclusively in RAW (MEF) format.
  • Rapid battery drain and significant heat generation during use.

Verdict

The Mamiya ZD Digital Back is a professional medium-format imaging solution featuring a 22-megapixel DALSA CCD sensor with a substantial 48 x 36mm surface area and a 1.16x crop factor. Key characteristics include its compatibility with the Mamiya 645AF system via the MSCE communication protocol, dual storage slots for CompactFlash and SD cards, and a unique user-replaceable low-pass filter system. Its primary pros are the exceptional 'film-like' color depth and high-resolution detail at its base ISO of 50, alongside a robust build and dedicated physical controls that streamline professional workflows. However, notable cons include its limited ISO range (maxing out at 400 with significant noise), slow image processing and write speeds, and a small 1.8-inch rear LCD with poor resolution that makes on-camera image review difficult.

Compare Mamiya ZD Back with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mamiya ZD Back and other products in the Cameras category

No results found