Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£5,370Sensor size:full frameWeight:?Battery life (CIPA):350 shots

Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Overall score

Score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 95% of cameras
3.9

Technical score

Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.8

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.9

Display & Design

8%

6.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 89% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £5,370

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm

Technical score
Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.8

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.9

Display & Design

8%

6.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

3.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
3.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.9

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

3.0
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 18 MP, which is higher than that of 55.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.8 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.8 µm, which are larger than those in 97.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
160
Base ISO
160
This camera has a base ISO of 160 which is higher than that of 80.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 2500 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 2,500
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 2,500, which is lower than that of 85.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Leica M
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
rangefinder
Weight
?
Width
139 mm
Width
139 mm
This camera has a width of 139 mm which is wider than 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
This camera has a height of 80 mm which is taller than 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.4% of cameras.
Thickness
37 mm
Thickness
37 mm
This camera has a thickness of 37 mm which is thinner than 64.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 350 shots, which is longer than that of 54.5% of cameras and equal to that of 5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1900 mAh
Battery capacity
1900 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1900 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 86.2% of cameras and equal to those in 2.1% of cameras.
Compatible alternatives may differ.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 3.46 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.8 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.8 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • 780 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1900 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1900 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    Compatible alternatives may differ.
    1,900 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Optical rangefinder viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    unofficial estimate
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Optical rangefinder viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 3.46 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.8 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.8 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    unofficial estimate
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • 780 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1900 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1900 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    Compatible alternatives may differ.
    1,900 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 22,800 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,900 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 18.52x more expensive
    Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm is more expensive than the average camera (£5,370 vs £290).
    £5,370 vs £290
  • 2.05x worse value for money
    Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (3.02 vs 6.2).
    3.02 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 0.1 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.68 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.68 x vs 0.78 x
  • 19.1 mm wider
    Width
    139 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (139 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    139 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 22,800 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,900 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 0.8 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    June 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 5 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    68 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (68 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    68 points vs 73 points
  • 0.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 3.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

K
keithwee.com
10/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
tahusa.co
05/03/2023
Summary of the review
P
pebbleplace.com
28/05/2018
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
06/05/2012
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
21/05/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
09/08/2011
Summary of the review
R
roter-punkt-kamera.de
21/11/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
13/11/2011
Summary of the review
Q
qimago.de
08/09/2020
Summary of the review
F
fotogoerlitz.de
26/06/2018
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
F
fae59.com
26/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
coolframe.wordpress.com
28/12/2015
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
22/11/2010
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm

  • Unique CCD sensor provides 'film-like' color and exceptional skin tones
  • Exceptional build quality with a sapphire crystal LCD cover and brass plates
  • Summilux lens offers legendary sharpness, even at f/1.4
  • Compact full-frame system that is far smaller than comparable DSLRs
  • Minimalist interface with simple menus and direct manual controls
  • Beautiful background bokeh and subject isolation from the f/1.4 aperture

What we don't like about Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm

  • Poor high ISO performance with noticeable noise above 800-1250
  • Slow image processing and a small buffer that limits continuous shooting
  • Low-resolution rear LCD makes it difficult to judge focus and detail
  • CCD sensor is prone to corrosion (requires checking for updated glass)
  • Extremely high price point for both the body and the Summilux lens
  • Lack of modern features like Live View, video recording, or WiFi

Verdict

The Leica M9-P is a professional-grade full-frame digital rangefinder featuring an 18.5-megapixel Kodak CCD sensor, highly prized for its unique 'film-like' colour rendering and exceptional micro-contrast. Distinguishing itself from the standard M9, the 'P' model includes a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal LCD cover, a more discreet design without the iconic red dot, and a classic top-plate engraving. Paired with the Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4 ASPH lens—which utilizes an aspherical element and a floating group for consistent sharpness from its f/1.4 maximum aperture down to 0.7m—the system provides world-class optical performance and smooth bokeh. Main pros include its compact all-metal brass and magnesium construction, intuitive manual controls, and a lack of an anti-aliasing filter for maximum detail. Notable cons include dated electronics with slow processing speeds, a low-resolution 230k-dot rear screen, poor high-ISO performance above 800, and the well-documented risk of CCD sensor corrosion (delamination).

Compare Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica M9 P Leica Summilux M 50mm and other products in the Cameras category

No results found