OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Roborock F25 Ultra Review | 43 Data compared

Avg. price:~£700Suction pressure:22 kPaCapacity:0.72 LPower:?Noise level:74 dBWeight:5.51 kg

Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Compare 43 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

80%

7.2

Technical score

20%

8.6

User score

★Better than 95% of wet-dry-vacuums
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category across these key areas: Performance, Battery, Design & Mobility, Filter & Accessories.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

40%

7.2

Performance

22%

7.3

Design & Mobility

20%

6.0

Filter & Accessories

18%

8.7

Battery

★Better than 94% of wet-dry-vacuums
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 2,911 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 77% of wet-dry-vacuums
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
  • roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra
roborock-f25-ultra

Best prices

    N/A~ £700

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of wet-dry vacuum Roborock F25 Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category across these key areas: Performance, Battery, Design & Mobility, Filter & Accessories.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

40%

7.2

Performance

22%

7.3

Design & Mobility

20%

6.0

Filter & Accessories

18%

8.7

Battery

7.2
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on 2,911 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you prefer products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category that have been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Roborock F25 Ultra has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than 87.1% of products in this category.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the overall score of products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category with their prices.
When it matters
When you are comparing products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category and want a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

6.8

Price

7.3
Power
?
Variable power
yes
Variable power
yes
▲ Better than 65% of models
This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power. This feature is present on 35% of wet-dry vacuums.
Capacity
0.72 L
Capacity
0.72 L
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.72 L, which is smaller than that of 76.2% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 10.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Noise level
74 dB
Noise level
74 dB
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB, which is lower than that of 67.4% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 7.4% of wet-dry vacuums.
Suction pressure
22 kPa
Suction pressure
22 kPa
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 22 kPa, which is higher than that of 77.8% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 6.1% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
▲ Better than 71% of models
This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation. This feature is present on 29.6% of wet-dry vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery runtime
60 minutes
Battery runtime
60 minutes
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <25 minutes – >65 minutes
This wet-dry vacuum offers 60 minutes of battery runtime, which is longer than that of 76% of wet-dry vacuums and the same length as that of 12% of wet-dry vacuums.
Charging time
4 hours
Charging time
4 hours
▲ Better than 20% of models
Market range: <3.5 hours – >4.5 hours
This wet-dry vacuum charges in 4 hours, a time shorter than that of 20.4% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 65.3% of wet-dry vacuums.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
▼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <18 V – >25.9 V
This wet-dry vacuum has a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is higher than that of 17% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 47.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
Power cable length
N/A
Operating radius
N/A
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 34% of models
This wet-dry vacuum is bagless. This feature is present on 66.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Tank material
plastic
Tank material
plastic
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This wet-dry vacuum uses plastic for its tank, which is less durable than the tank materials used by 41.6% of wet-dry vacuums and comparable in durability to those used by 58.4% of them.
Power cable holder
no
Power cable holder
no
▼ Worse than 66% of models
This wet-dry vacuum does not have a holder for the power cord. This feature is present on 65.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
N. of filters
2
N. of filters
2
▲ Better than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This wet-dry vacuum has 2 filters, more than 24.8% of wet-dry vacuums and the same number as 56.4% of wet-dry vacuums.
HEPA filter
yes
HEPA filter
yes
▲ Better than 58% of models
This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter. This feature is present on 41.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Washable filter
yes
Washable filter
yes
▲ Better than 8% of models
This wet-dry vacuum includes a washable filter. This feature is present on 92% of wet-dry vacuums.
Automatic filter cleaning
no
Automatic filter cleaning
no
▼ Worse than 9% of models
This wet-dry vacuum does not have automatic filter cleaning. This feature is present on 9.4% of wet-dry vacuums.
Flexible hose
no
Flexible hose
no
▼ Worse than 73% of models
This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose. This feature is present on 72.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more

Roborock F25 Ultra vs the average wet-dry vacuum

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryDesign & MobilityFilter & Accessories
  • 4 kPa more suction pressure
    Suction pressure
    22 kPa
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
    This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 22 kPa; the average wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 18 kPa.
    22 kPa vs 18 kPa
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation; the average wet-dry vacuum requires a power cord.
  • Adjustable power
    Variable power
    yes
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have adjustable suction power.
  • Includes a HEPA filter
    HEPA filter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter; the average wet-dry vacuum does not include a HEPA filter.
  • 20 minutes more battery runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <25 minutes – >65 minutes
    This wet-dry vacuum offers 60 minutes of battery runtime; the average wet-dry vacuum offers 40 minutes of battery runtime.
    60 minutes vs 40 minutes
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery-level indicator; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have a battery-level indicator.
  • 2 dB less operating noise
    Noise level
    74 dB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
    This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB; the average wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 76 dB.
    74 dB vs 76 dB
  • 600 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,600 mAh
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.5k mAh – >5k mAh
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4600 mAh; the average wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh.
    4,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • 8% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Roborock F25 Ultra
    the average wet-dry vacuum
    Roborock F25 Ultra has a higher user score than the average wet-dry vacuum (8.64 vs 8.000).
    8.64 vs 8
  • 47.4% more popular
    Roborock F25 Ultra is more popular than the average wet-dry vacuum (9.7 vs 6.6).
    9.7 vs 6.58
  • 4 kPa more suction pressure
    Suction pressure
    22 kPa
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
    This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 22 kPa; the average wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 18 kPa.
    22 kPa vs 18 kPa
  • Adjustable power
    Variable power
    yes
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have adjustable suction power.
  • 2 dB less operating noise
    Noise level
    74 dB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
    This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB; the average wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 76 dB.
    74 dB vs 76 dB
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation; the average wet-dry vacuum requires a power cord.
  • 20 minutes more battery runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <25 minutes – >65 minutes
    This wet-dry vacuum offers 60 minutes of battery runtime; the average wet-dry vacuum offers 40 minutes of battery runtime.
    60 minutes vs 40 minutes
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery-level indicator; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have a battery-level indicator.
  • 600 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,600 mAh
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.5k mAh – >5k mAh
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4600 mAh; the average wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh.
    4,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • 3.3% lighter
    Weight
    5.51 kg
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <3.79 kg – >9.1 kg
    40% lighter: this wet-dry vacuum is lighter than the average wet-dry vacuum (5.5 kg vs 5.7 kg).
    5.51 kg vs 5.7 kg
  • Includes a HEPA filter
    HEPA filter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter; the average wet-dry vacuum does not include a HEPA filter.
  • 14.28 L less tank capacity
    Capacity
    0.72 L
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
    This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.7 L; the average wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 15 L.
    0.72 L vs 15 L
  • No rigid extension tubes
    Rigid extension tubes
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include rigid extension tubes; the average wet-dry vacuum includes rigid extension tubes.
  • No universal floor nozzle
    Universal floor nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a universal floor nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a universal floor nozzle.
  • No cable holder
    Power cable holder
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not have a holder for the power cord; the average wet-dry vacuum has a holder for the power cord.
  • 2 fewer wheels
    Number of wheels
    2
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer wheels than the average wet-dry vacuum (2 vs 4).
    2 vs 4
  • No crevice nozzle
    Flat crevice nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flat crevice nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flat crevice nozzle.
  • No flexible hose
    Flexible hose
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flexible hose.
  • No blower function
    Blowing attachment
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a blowing attachment; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a blowing attachment.
  • 5.38x more expensive
    Roborock F25 Ultra is more expensive than the average wet-dry vacuum (£700 vs £130).
    £700 vs £130
  • 2.4% worse value for money
    Roborock F25 Ultra offers worse value for money than the average wet-dry vacuum (7.3 vs 7.5).
    7.3 vs 7.48
  • 14.28 L less tank capacity
    Capacity
    0.72 L
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
    This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.7 L; the average wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 15 L.
    0.72 L vs 15 L
  • No cable holder
    Power cable holder
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not have a holder for the power cord; the average wet-dry vacuum has a holder for the power cord.
  • 2 fewer wheels
    Number of wheels
    2
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer wheels than the average wet-dry vacuum (2 vs 4).
    2 vs 4
  • No rigid extension tubes
    Rigid extension tubes
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include rigid extension tubes; the average wet-dry vacuum includes rigid extension tubes.
  • No universal floor nozzle
    Universal floor nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a universal floor nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a universal floor nozzle.
  • No flexible hose
    Flexible hose
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flexible hose.
  • No crevice nozzle
    Flat crevice nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flat crevice nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flat crevice nozzle.
  • No blower function
    Blowing attachment
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a blowing attachment; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a blowing attachment.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

V
vacuumwars.com
22/05/2026
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Steam & Hot Water Cleaning Power for Hard Floors
V
vacuumchef.com
26/05/2026
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: The Most Powerful Cordless Wet Dry Vacuum With Steam Cleaning
D
digitalreviews.net
16/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Steam Cleaning Power for the Toughest Messes
E
en.techreviewer.de
24/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: The steamroller against stubborn stains!
T
trustedreviews.com
31/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review - Trusted Reviews
R
reviewed.com
24/06/2026
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Series: Which wet-dry vacuum is best for you?
T
techradar.com
11/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: the most powerful, capable wet and dry vacuum
B
bgr.com
01/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Wet & Dry Vacuum Review - BGR
E
en.techreviewer.de
24/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: The steamroller against stubborn dirt
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
02/12/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
11/12/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: This Wet and Dry Vacuum Cleaner Even Cleans with Hot Steam
(Translated)Show original
N
n-tv.de
05/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Full Steam Against Dirt?
(Translated)Show original
S
smarthomeassistent.de
12/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra | REVIEW | Wet and dry vacuum with hot steam
(Translated)Show original
S
smart-home-fox.de
02/12/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Is the Premium Vacuum Mop Worth It?
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/12/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: The "Steam" Evolution of the F25 Range
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
16/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Our Full Verdict - Cordless Stick Vacuums
(Translated)Show original
C
capital.fr
07/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: Hot water and steam deliver a near-flawless performance
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.techreviewer.de
24/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review: The steamroller against stubborn stains!
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
04/09/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: steam floor cleaner that cleans deeply
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
20/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra steam wet and dry vacuum review
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
26/10/2025
Summary of the review
STEAM and DETERGENT. ROBOROCK F25 Ultra Review
(Translated)Show original
C
corriere.it
27/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: How the steam-sanitizing floor washer works
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
19/07/2026
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 STEAM vs. ULTRA: Review and Comparison
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.techreviewer.de
24/11/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra review: The steamroller against stubborn stains!
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgetgear.nl
01/12/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Ultra Review - GadgetGear.nl
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,911 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Roborock F25 Ultra

  • Dual high-temperature cleaning modes combining both true steam and hot water functionality.
  • Powerful 22,000 Pa suction that effectively lifts heavy wet spills and dry debris in one pass.
  • Excellent maneuverability assisted by smooth, dual-motorized steering wheels.
  • Efficient edge-to-edge roller design that cleans completely flush against walls and baseboards.
  • Fully lies flat at 180 degrees to easily reach far underneath low furniture.
  • Thorough dock-based self-cleaning system that washes rollers with hot water/steam and dries them rapidly with hot air.
  • Integrated app control to easily adjust modes, voice alerts, and drying presets.

What we don't like about Roborock F25 Ultra

  • Notably heavy and bulky frame compared to the category average for hard floor cleaners.
  • Heated cleaning modes draw substantial power, causing the battery life to drop significantly during use.
  • Fast self-drying mode on the dock can be quite loud and disruptive.
  • Premium price point makes it an expensive investment compared to standard wet-dry vacuums.
  • Not suitable or recommended for deep cleaning carpets or thick area rugs.
  • Hair can still occasionally wrap or tangle around the roller system over prolonged use.

Verdict

The Roborock F25 Ultra is a high-performance cordless wet-dry vacuum and mop combo that delivers a powerful 22,000 Pa suction and features an innovative dual high-temperature system offering 356°F (180°C) steam cleaning alongside 187°F hot water modes to sanitize floors and melt grease. Its standout characteristics include an advanced 180° lay-flat design for reaching under low furniture, AI-enhanced SlideTech 2.0 self-propelled wheels, edge-to-edge cleaning with under 1mm clearance, a JawScrapers anti-tangle brush roll, smart dirt sensors, and integrated blue light illumination to spotlight hidden debris. Major pros center on its exceptional grease breakdown and 99.99% bacteria removal without harsh chemicals, alongside an automated docking maintenance system that washes the roller with 194°F hot water/steam and dries it via 203°F hot air in a rapid 5-minute or quiet 30-minute cycle. On the downside, the unit can be quite loud during its initial self-cleaning phase, relies on consistent tank maintenance due to the 740 ml clean and 720 ml dirty water limits, and independent testing indicates that real-world output temperatures during operation may measure lower than the manufacturer's maximum claimed technical specs.

Compare Roborock F25 Ultra with other products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Roborock F25 Ultra and other products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category

No results found