Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£990RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-4202Y

Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 76% of tablets
5.4

Value for money

Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

5.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

3.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 72%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £990
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 256GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

3.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

5.3

Price

5.4
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Core i5-4202Y
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4202Y chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 73.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366×768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366×768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
135 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 135 ppi which is lower than that of 96.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,896 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,896 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 90.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
8.3 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.3 hours, which is shorter than that of 71.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
?
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
816 g
This tablet weighs 816 g which is heavier than 95.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4202Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-4202Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SATA storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SATA vs eMMC
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4202Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-4202Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SATA storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SATA vs eMMC
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • 30.5% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (848 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    848 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 39.7% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (135 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    135 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 40.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,896 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,896 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 398 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (2 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    2 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.81x more expensive
    Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£990 vs £260).
    £990 vs £260
  • 31.9% worse value for money
    Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.38 vs 7.1).
    5.38 vs 7.1
  • 4.81x less popular
    Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 28.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (10.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    10.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 39.7% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (135 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    135 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 398 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (2 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    2 nits vs 400 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (567:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    567:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 86 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (135 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    135 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1366×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 5 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (396 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    396 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 40.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,896 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,896 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 1.7 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.3 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8.3 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 66.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (816 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    816 g vs 490 g
  • 3.6 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.6 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 127.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (303 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    303 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 80 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (280 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    280.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 5 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    January 2014
    2014 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
notebookcheck.net
17/06/2014
Summary of the review
I
itwire.com
01/08/2014
Summary of the review
S
sentragrafika.com
09/05/2014
Summary of the review
U
umpcportal.com
28/05/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
24/06/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
19/12/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
19/06/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Completely silent fanless design with a Core i5 processor for quiet operation
  • High-quality, usable keyboard and responsive touchpad included in the dock
  • Good overall system performance for business tasks, web browsing, and office work
  • Solid build quality with a robust magnetic hinge mechanism
  • Impressive SSD read/write speeds that improve daily productivity
  • Respectable combined battery life when used with the keyboard dock

What customers don't like about Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Relatively heavy for a tablet, making it less comfortable for extended handheld use
  • Low screen resolution (1366x768) compared to competitors offering Full HD
  • Limited screen tilt angle (approx. 110 degrees) makes it difficult to use on a lap
  • Significant thermal throttling of the CPU during long-duration, intensive tasks
  • Unit can be top-heavy and prone to tipping over if tilted back too far
  • Tablet lacks an integrated kickstand and physical video output ports

Verdict

The HP Pro x2 410 G1 is a versatile 11.6-inch detachable 2-in-1 hybrid designed for business portability, featuring an Intel Core i3 or i5 Y-series processor, 4GB of DDR3L RAM, and a 64GB SSD. Its primary characteristics include a fanless, silent design, a bright 1366x768 IPS touchscreen, and a dual-battery system split between the tablet and its mechanical keyboard dock. Key pros include its quiet operation, high-quality front and rear 2MP webcams, Beats Audio integration, and a robust selection of ports on the base, such as HDMI and USB 3.0. However, cons include a relatively heavy total weight of approximately 3.5 lbs, a top-heavy design that makes it prone to tipping when used on a lap, and potential performance throttling under heavy thermal loads due to its fanless architecture.

Compare Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hp Pro X2 410 (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found