OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z2420

Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 80% of tablets
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

5.7

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 76% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £260

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

5.7

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

5.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Process node
32 nm
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 82.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2420
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2420
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z2420 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 84.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Pixel density
216 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi which is lower than that of 52.1% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.2 MP which is lower than in 86.3% of tablets and equal to that in 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,270 mAh
Battery capacity
4,270 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,270 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 81.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Battery life
9 hours
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
333 g
Weight
333 g
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 333 g which is lighter than 86.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 32% lighter
    Weight
    333 g
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (333 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    333 g vs 490 g
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 32% lighter
    Weight
    333 g
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (333 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    333 g vs 490 g
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.8
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 35.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,270 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4270 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,270 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 4.81x less popular
    Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 9.8% worse value for money
    Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.47 vs 7.1).
    6.47 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.29x larger process node
    Process node
    32 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR SGX540
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX540 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Chemically Strengthened Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 3.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    216 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (216 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    216 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.8
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 35.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,270 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4270 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,270 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    9 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Fonepad 4G
    the average tablet
    Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 2.4 mm thicker
    Thickness
    10.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (10.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    10.4 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 21.1 mm wider
    Width
    196.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (196.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    196.4 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
22/07/2014
Summary of the review
Asus Fonepad 7 LTE review - Tech Advisor
G
geeknetic.es
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS Fonepad [Análisis Completo en Español]
(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
23/02/2014
Summary of the review
ASUS Fonepad Note 6 [Análisis Completo en Español] Would you like to compare the 4G network compatibility of this specific model with newer Asus table...
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
12/11/2022
Summary of the review
ASUS Fonepad: de ultieme gebruikerstest Would you like me to find English-language technical reviews for this exact model to compare benchmark scores?
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
15/05/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Fonepad serie - Notebookcheck.nl(tweakers.net) | 26 May 2013 | Asus Fonepad Grijs review door Anoniem(www.tabletguide.nl) | 25 February 2014 | As...
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
26/06/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Asus Fonepad K004 (ME371MG): de plaat voor je kop
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
20/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Asus Fonepad 7 (ME372CG)
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
02/01/2014
Summary of the review
ASUS Fonepad 7 review: tweede generatie 7-inch telefoon - Hardware Info
(Translated)Show original
C
ct.nl
30/05/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Fonepad met 7"-display, telefoonfunctie en Intel-cpu - Ct.nl
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
17/06/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS FonePad review: smartphone en/of tablet - Hardware Info
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Excellent value for money, combining tablet and phone features in one affordable device.
  • Solid build quality, often featuring a premium-feeling metallic finish.
  • Strong battery life that can last through a full day of mixed usage.
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot, a feature lacking in some contemporary rivals like the Nexus 7.
  • Dual front-facing speakers on newer models provide clear and loud audio.
  • Good screen resolution and viewing angles for its price point.

What we don't like about Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Awkward and 'silly' to use as a primary phone due to its large 7-inch or 8-inch size.
  • Mediocre camera performance, with some models even lacking a rear-facing camera entirely.
  • Occasional performance lag or sluggishness, especially when multitasking or running intensive apps.
  • Thick display bezels and a slightly bulky, heavy profile compared to slimmer tablet competitors.
  • Highly reflective screen surface that can be difficult to see in bright outdoor conditions.
  • Reported software issues after certain OS updates, such as 'ghost typing' or connectivity drops.

Verdict

The ASUS Fonepad 4G is a 7-inch tablet and smartphone hybrid featuring a 1280 x 800 IPS display, 16GB of internal storage, and 1GB of RAM. It is powered by a 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Atom Z2560 processor and runs on Android 4.2 Jelly Bean, offering unique cellular capabilities including 4G LTE connectivity and voice calling. Main characteristics include a sleek design with a metallic-finish back and a 3,950mAh battery that provides impressive longevity for a device of its size. Pros include its vibrant high-definition screen with wide viewing angles, expandable storage via a microSD slot, and the value of having mobile data and phone functions in a budget-friendly tablet. However, cons include mediocre camera performance, a bulky form factor that makes it awkward to use as a primary phone, and occasional performance stutters during graphic-intensive tasks or heavy multitasking.

Compare Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Fonepad 4G (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found