OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530RAM capacity:0.5 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:9.7 inchesChipset:?

Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

6.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of tablets
5.7

Value for money

Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 98%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

4.3

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

4.9

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 97%
6.3

User score

User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 93%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £530
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
32GBCheck price64GBCheck price
Other versions:
16GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

4.3

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

4.9

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

4.6
User score
User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

6.3
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Popularity:
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) has a user popularity of 4.8 points, which is lower than 49.5% of Tablets.
4.8
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

5.7
RAM capacity
0.5 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 0.5 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 97.1% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×768 which is lower than that of 90.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
132 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 132 ppi which is lower than that of 97.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Aluminosilicate Glass
This tablet uses Aluminosilicate Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 58% of tablets and equal to that on 7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
0.7 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 0.7 MP which is lower than that of 99.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,930 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,930 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 53.7% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
?
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
iOS
This tablet uses the iOS operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 98.5%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
601 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 601 g which is heavier than 77.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports AirPlay
    This tablet supports AirPlay, the average tablet does not. 7.6% of tablets are AirPlay compatible.
  • 10 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (410 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    410 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
    Reduce White Point accessibility dimming
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 10 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (410 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    410 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports AirPlay
    This tablet supports AirPlay, the average tablet does not. 7.6% of tablets are AirPlay compatible.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
    Reduce White Point accessibility dimming
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 7.3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (0.7 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    0.7 MP vs 8 MP
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (iOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    iOS vs Android
  • 41.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 25% worse value for money
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.68 vs 7.1).
    5.68 vs 7.1
  • 26.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular
    the average tablet
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.33 vs 8.000).
    6.33 vs 8
  • 2.04x more expensive
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£530 vs £260).
    £530 vs £260
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX543MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX543MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • 75% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 69.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (200 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    200 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 800 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,066 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,066 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 41.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×768 vs 1920×1200
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (775:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    775:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 89 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (132 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    132 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 0.4 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    9.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 7.3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (0.7 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    0.7 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    2.1 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (iOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    iOS vs Android
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular
    the average tablet
    Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 22.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (601 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    601 g vs 490 g
  • 8 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    March 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • 2 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (2 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    2 points vs 4 points
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.8 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 41.2 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (241.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    241.2 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Benjamin's Tech
≈ estimated
24/08/2020
Long-term use · streaming and daily use
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is not usable as a main device, but it is fine as a spare streaming tablet.
4.0
91Tech
≈ estimated
22/05/2020
Long-term use · daily use on iOS 9
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is only useful as a streaming device; a newer iPad is the better buy.
8.0
Jon Rettinger
≈ estimated
04/04/2011
One-month review · daily use and accessory tests
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is the best choice for new buyers, though iOS annoyances and the Smart Cover are drawbacks.
9.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
02/04/2011
Full review · week of daily use, cameras and gaming
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is a fantastic tablet for anyone who wants the latest model, but first-gen owners can skip it.
9.0
Ty Moss
≈ estimated
25/03/2011
Hands-on review · daily use and accessory tests
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is recommended for browsing and games, but not an upgrade for first-generation iPad owners.
9.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
17/03/2011
Full review · battery, camera and FaceTime tests
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is still a great tablet in its own right, though iOS feels dated next to Android.
9.0
Jon Rettinger
≈ estimated
14/03/2011
Hands-on review · hardware, cameras, accessories and browsing
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular won't disappoint if you can live within iOS limits, but iPad 1 owners have little reason to upgrade.
9.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
12/03/2011
Hands-on review · speed, browser, FaceTime and gaming tests
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is a nice evolutionary upgrade, best for buyers without an iPad and less so for original owners.
8.0
Jonathan Morrison
≈ estimated
16/03/2011
Hands-on review · photo booth, apps and camera tests
Verdict
Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular is recommended, though upgrading from an iPad 1 is only worth it for cameras or gaming.
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

uk.pcmag.com
28/07/2011
Hands-on test · Tablet comparison
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is a thin, smooth tablet with strong graphics that outpaces most rivals, but its rear camera and missing Flash hold it back.
techradar.com
17/07/2011
Long-term test · iOS 5.1 update
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is still a strong, polished tablet, but its dual-core chip and lack of innovation put it behind the new iPad.
3g.co.uk
11/03/2011
Hands-on test · Media and apps
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is a sleek, quick tablet with great apps, but missing Flash video and clunky iTunes dependence make it hard to justify upgrading.
the-gadgeteer.com
16/03/2011
Owner's test · Smart Cover and speed
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is quicker than the original, with a Smart Cover that doubles as a typing stand, but its back stays unprotected and slippery.
expertreviews.co.uk
17/03/2011
Hands-on test · Upgrade advice
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is the best tablet for new buyers, with speed and long battery life, though owners of the first iPad have little reason to upgrade.
trustedreviews.com
12/04/2011
Hands-on review · Screen and battery
Verdict
The iPad 2 has the best tablet screen so far, plus a thinner, lighter body and long battery life, but its cameras are poor.
macworld.com
09/03/2011
Practical review · Design and speed
Verdict
The iPad 2 is a solid upgrade, thinner and lighter with faster performance and strong apps, though it's still too heavy to hold one-handed for long reading.
mobiletechreview.com
15/03/2011
Hands-on review · Design and speed
Verdict
The iPad 2 is a thinner, faster update that suits non-technical users, though its weak rear camera and lack of hotspot sharing disappoint.
notebookcheck.net
06/05/2011
Lab test · Performance and battery
Verdict
The iPad 2 improves on the first model with faster browsing and good battery life, but its cameras and iTunes-dependent system hold it back.
techradar.com
08/04/2011
Review · 3G connectivity
Verdict
The iPad 2 3G is a keeper for people who need internet away from Wi-Fi, since the 3G chip adds to the price and needs a data plan.
itpro.com
21/03/2011
Review · Business tablet use
Verdict
The iPad 2 is the tablet to beat, with excellent battery life and slick iOS, but owners of the original iPad have little reason to upgrade.
C
computerbase.de
17/08/2011
Summary of the review
Apple iPad 2 im Test: Dünner, leichter und auch besser [ComputerBase]
(Translated)Show original
computerbild.de
23/03/2011
Test · Design and speed
Verdict
The iPad 2 is flat, light and quick, but its camera only suits video calls, and the first iPad resists scratches better.
notebookcheck.com
27/04/2011
Lab test · Battery and build
Verdict
The iPad 2 is a high-quality, quiet tablet with long battery life and easy controls, but its cameras fall short and owners of the first model gain little.
allesebook.de
01/04/2012
Long-term test · eBook reading
Verdict
The iPad 2 is a capable all-rounder, but as an e-book reader its glossy screen is hard to read in direct sunlight and looks less sharp than dedicated readers.
futurezone.at
25/03/2011
Hands-on test · Tablet upgrade
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is a solid update, thinner and quicker than the first iPad, but Apple's closed system and weak cameras remain.
heise.de
27/03/2011
Review summary · Evolutionary upgrade
Verdict
The Apple iPad 2 is a polished, faster tablet that suits new buyers, though owners of the first iPad may find the upgrade minor.
N
notebookcheck.com
09/03/2011
Summary of the review
Apple iPad 2 - Notebookcheck.com Externe Tests
(Translated)Show original
planetoftech.de
23/11/2016
Test report · Design and accessories
Verdict
The iPad 2 is still the top tablet, with a fast processor and premium design, but owners of the first model don't need to upgrade yet.
pcwelt.de
16/03/2011
Lab test · Tablet performance
Verdict
The iPad 2 is a slimmer, faster upgrade that costs no more than the original, though its 512 MB of memory is modest.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB)

  • Durable and premium aluminum construction with a slim design
  • Excellent battery life, with some testers reporting over 17 hours of video playback
  • Vast ecosystem of tablet-optimized apps and high-end 3D games
  • Improved performance and responsiveness compared to the original iPad due to the dual-core A5 chip
  • Cellular (3G) models include Assisted GPS (A-GPS) for accurate navigation
  • Wide viewing angles from the 9.7-inch IPS display

What customers don't like about Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB)

  • Poor camera quality, with reviewers describing photos as blurry, grainy, and unacceptably weak
  • Lack of Adobe Flash support, which limits accessibility to some web content
  • Outdated display resolution by modern standards, lacking the sharpness of Retina displays
  • Heavily reliant on iTunes for data transfers and file management
  • Limited software longevity, as it is no longer supported by modern iOS updates beyond version 9.3.5
  • Reflective glass makes the screen difficult to see in direct sunlight or bright indoor light

Verdict

The Apple iPad 2 WiFi + Cellular (16GB) is a second-generation tablet featuring a 9.7-inch LED-backlit IPS display with a 1024x768 resolution and an oleophobic coating. Powered by a 1GHz dual-core Apple A5 chip and 512MB of RAM, it provides approximately 10 hours of battery life and supports 3G data, Wi-Fi, and A-GPS. Its main pros include a significantly thinner and lighter design than the original model, faster processing speeds, and the addition of dual cameras (720p rear and VGA front) for FaceTime. However, key cons include the low-quality, grainy performance of those cameras for still photography, the lack of a high-resolution Retina display, and its current status as an outdated device that no longer supports modern software or security updates.

Compare Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Apple iPad 2 WiFi Cellular (16GB) and other tablets

No results found