Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4470

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.2

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 85% of tablets
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 83%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

7.1

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

5.2

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 81%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

7.1

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

5.2

Audio & Multimedia

5.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
TI OMAP 4470
This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 67.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
254 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 254 ppi which is higher than that of 69.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 4.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
9 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 9 W which is slower than in 94.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.8% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Fire
This tablet uses the Fire operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 82%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
567 g
This tablet weighs 567 g which is heavier than 68.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 65,790 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (65790 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    65,790 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,470 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 13.4% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • 33 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,470 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 65,790 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (65790 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    65,790 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • 13.4% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 33 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 4.81x less popular
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 11.8% worse value for money
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.35 vs 7.1).
    6.35 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX544 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX544 vs Mali-G51
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (917:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    917:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 50% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (9 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    9 W vs 18 W
  • 8.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire vs Android
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 15.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (567 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    567 g vs 490 g
  • 7 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    November 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.8 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 40 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (240 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    240.0 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
expertreviews.co.uk
12/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
30/03/2013
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
21/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
M
mobiletechreview.com
30/11/2012
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
29/11/2012
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
10/12/2012
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
19/11/2012
Summary of the review
I
ibtimes.co.uk
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
techdigest.tv
28/03/2013
Summary of the review
T
teltarif.de
07/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
02/01/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
16/05/2013
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
25/09/2012
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
13/04/2013
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
20/12/2012
Summary of the review
L
literaturcafe.de
26/10/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • High-resolution HD display with excellent sharpness and clarity for reading and video
  • Customised Dolby audio with dual stereo speakers providing punchy, rich sound
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors like the iPad
  • Seamless streaming performance, particularly for Amazon Prime and Netflix content
  • Ultra-fast dual-band, dual-antenna Wi-Fi for reliable browsing and streaming
  • Snappier navigation and interface compared to smaller 7-inch models

What we don't like about Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • Limited app ecosystem with no native Google Play Store or Google apps
  • Heavily locked into the Amazon ecosystem, which can feel restrictive for power users
  • Web browsing performance is often reported as sluggish or slow to launch
  • Battery life can be inconsistent, often falling short of the 10-hour claim during heavy use
  • Lack of expandable storage (no microSD slot) and no built-in GPS
  • Physical buttons are flush with the chassis, making them difficult to find by touch

Verdict

The Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 (WiFi, 1GB RAM, 32GB) is a dedicated media consumption tablet featuring a high-resolution 8.9-inch IPS display (1920 x 1200 at 254 ppi) and a 1.5GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4470 processor. Its main characteristics include dual-band, dual-antenna WiFi for faster streaming, a 1.3MP front-facing HD camera for video calls, and integrated stereo speakers with Dolby Digital Plus audio. The primary pros are its vibrant, sharp screen that supports native 1080p video, solid battery life reaching up to 10 hours, and a relatively thin, lightweight design compared to same-era 10-inch tablets. Notable cons include a lack of GPS and expandable storage, a limited app selection within the Amazon Appstore compared to Google Play, and occasional lag when navigating complex web pages or using the customized Fire OS interface.

Compare Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch WiFi (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found