OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£700RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-3317U

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 68% of tablets
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

3.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 70% of tablets
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 127 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 79% of tablets
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb
acer-iconia-w700-128gb-4gb-128gb

Best prices

    N/A~ £700

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

3.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.5
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 127 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Popularity:
Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 6.4 points, which is lower than 62.4% of Tablets.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

6.8

Price

6.0
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
Process node
22 nm
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Core i5-3317U
Chipset
Intel Core i5-3317U
â–² Better than 73% of models
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3317U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 73.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1080
Screen resolution
1920×1080
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1080 which is lower than that of 61% of tablets and equal to that of 2.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
190 ppi
Pixel density
190 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 190 ppi which is lower than that of 65.1% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1 MP
Front camera megapixels
1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1 MP which is lower than in 91.1% of tablets and equal to that in 1.3% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,850 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.8% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Charging speed
65 W
Charging speed
65 W
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 91.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.7% of tablets.
Battery life
6.5 hours
Battery life
6.5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 91.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
Operating system
Windows
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
950 g
Weight
950 g
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 950 g which is heavier than 97.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Core i5-3317U
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3317U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-3317U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    65 W
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • 35% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.7 GHz
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    SSD
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    11.6 inches
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Core i5-3317U
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-3317U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-3317U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 35% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.7 GHz
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    SSD
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 12 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    16
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (16 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    16 vs 4
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    25.6 GB/s
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    11.6 inches
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    65 W
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • 4 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3.5 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 93.9% heavier
    Weight
    950 g
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (950 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    950 g vs 490 g
  • 2.69x more expensive
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£700 vs £260).
    £700 vs £260
  • 17.8% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.02 vs 7.1).
    6.02 vs 7.1
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia W700
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.35 vs 8.000).
    7.35 vs 8
  • 53.3% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    883 points
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (883 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    883 points vs 1,891 points
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57.1% larger process node
    Process node
    22 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 15.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    190 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    951:1
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (951:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    951:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1920×1080
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920×1080 vs 1920×1200
  • 31 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    190 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 3.5 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 26.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,850 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4850 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,850 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 93.9% heavier
    Weight
    950 g
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (950 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    950 g vs 490 g
  • 3.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 119.7 mm wider
    Width
    295.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (295 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    295.0 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
infoworld.com
13/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: A mixed bag of Windows 8 whatsit
P
pcworld.com
14/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: Tablet, meet desktop
C
cnet.com
12/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: Laptop power in a tablet package
T
trustedreviews.com
14/05/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review
U
uk.pcmag.com
09/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700-6465 - Review 2013
M
mobiletechreview.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review - MobileTechReview
E
expertreviews.co.uk
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review | Expert Reviews
T
techradar.com
06/02/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review - TechRadar
W
wired.com
30/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Iconia W700 - WIRED
A
arstechnica.com
22/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer's Iconia W700 is an Ultrabook in a tablet's body
I
ibtimes.co.uk
21/01/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review | IBTimes UK
P
pcwelt.de
05/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 im Test - PC-WELT
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
04/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 im Test | NETZWELT
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
20/12/2012
Summary of the review
Test Iconia Tab W700 d’Acer: un peu trop hybride
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexpertoit.com
25/10/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700P, análisis a fondo - tuexpertoIT.com
(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
15/03/2013
Summary of the review
Acer W700 [Análisis Completo en Español] - Geeknetic
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexperto.com
29/07/2013
Summary of the review
tuexperto.com: Acer Iconia Tab W700, lo hemos probado(computerhoy.com) | 02/02/2013 | Computer Hoy: Acer Iconia W700: Windows 8 en 11 pulgadas
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
07/07/2013
Summary of the review
Xataka: Acer Iconia W700, prueba a fondo
(Translated)Show original
B
batista70phone.com
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 (i3): Caratteristiche e Test batteria
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
05/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Iconia Tab W700 Windows 8 tablet
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
23/12/2012
Summary of the review
Grondige en onafhankelijke Acer Iconia Tab W700-reviews
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
20/06/2013
Summary of the review
Review Acer Iconia W700-53334G12as Tablet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 127 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 57 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB)

  • High-resolution 11.6-inch Full HD (1920x1080) IPS display with excellent viewing angles and clarity
  • Strong performance from Intel Core i3/i5 processors, making it significantly faster than typical Atom or ARM tablets
  • Excellent battery life for a Windows 8 device, often lasting 6 to 8 hours depending on usage
  • Premium build quality with a sturdy, unibody aluminum chassis
  • Comprehensive bundle of accessories often included, such as a Bluetooth keyboard, leather carrying case, and desktop dock
  • Full Windows 8/10 experience allowing the installation of standard desktop applications

What we don't like about Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB)

  • Bulky and heavy design (over 2 pounds) makes it difficult to hold as a traditional tablet for long periods
  • The included plastic cradle/dock is often described as cheap, non-adjustable, and cumbersome to transport
  • Lack of an SD or microSD card slot for expandable storage
  • High display resolution can make icons and text in standard Windows desktop mode too small to navigate easily by touch
  • Limited connectivity on the tablet itself, featuring only a single USB 3.0 port
  • Presence of pre-installed 'bloatware' from Acer that some users found intrusive or unnecessary

Verdict

The Acer Iconia W700 is an 11.6-inch Windows 8 tablet featuring a sharp 1920 x 1080 Full HD IPS display with 10-point multi-touch and wide 178-degree viewing angles. This specific model is powered by a third-generation Intel Core i5 processor (typically the i5-3337U or i5-3317U) paired with 4GB of DDR3 RAM and a fast 128GB SSD, delivering performance comparable to an Ultrabook. Encased in a sturdy unibody aluminium chassis, it includes a versatile desktop cradle with three additional USB 3.0 ports, a micro-HDMI port, and a Bluetooth keyboard for enhanced productivity. Its main pros include an exceptional display, fast boot times of around 6 seconds, and strong performance for a tablet of its era; however, it is notably heavy at approximately 925g, lacks a built-in memory card slot, and the high-resolution screen can make desktop icons difficult to navigate with touch alone.

Compare Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found