OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£550RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:Intel Core i3-2365M

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 69% of tablets
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

22%

6.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

3.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 72% of tablets
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 57 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 79% of tablets
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
  • acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb
acer-iconia-w700-64gb-4gb-64gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

22%

6.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

5.8

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

3.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.5
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 57 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Popularity:
Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 6.4 points, which is lower than 62.4% of Tablets.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

7.6

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
Process node
22 nm
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
412 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
412 points
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 412 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 70.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i3-2365M
Chipset
Intel Core i3-2365M
â–² Better than 66% of models
This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-2365M chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 66.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1080
Screen resolution
1920×1080
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1080 which is lower than that of 61% of tablets and equal to that of 2.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
190 ppi
Pixel density
190 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 190 ppi which is lower than that of 65.1% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
â–² Better than 78% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 2 display glass which is stronger than that on 78.2% of tablets and equal to that on 1.9% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
Battery capacity
4,850 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,850 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.8% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Charging speed
20 W
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 20 W which is faster than in 60.4% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Battery life
9 hours
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
?
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
Operating system
Windows
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
950 g
Weight
950 g
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 950 g which is heavier than 97.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 4.89x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    9,252 points
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (9252 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    9,252 points vs 1,891 points
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Core i3-2365M
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-2365M chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-2365M vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    SSD
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    11.6 inches
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 30% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.6 GHz
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 4.89x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    9,252 points
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (9252 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    9,252 points vs 1,891 points
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Core i3-2365M
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-2365M chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-2365M vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    SSD
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 30% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.6 GHz
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 12 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    16
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (16 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    16 vs 4
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    25.6 GB/s
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 1.5 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    11.6 inches
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 337 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    337 Hz
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (337 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    337 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • More durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 93.9% heavier
    Weight
    950 g
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (950 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    950 g vs 490 g
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    418:1
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (418:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    418:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 13.8% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.24 vs 7.1).
    6.24 vs 7.1
  • 2.12x more expensive
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£550 vs £260).
    £550 vs £260
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia W700
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.35 vs 8.000).
    7.35 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 46.2% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    350 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (350 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    350 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 43.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    412 points
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (412 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    412 points vs 729 points
  • 57.1% larger process node
    Process node
    22 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    418:1
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (418:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    418:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 15.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    190 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1920×1080
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920×1080 vs 1920×1200
  • 31 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    190 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 26.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,850 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4850 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,850 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    9 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No widgets
    Widgets support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 93.9% heavier
    Weight
    950 g
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (950 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    950 g vs 490 g
  • 4.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    12.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (12.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    12.7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 119.7 mm wider
    Width
    295.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (295 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    295.0 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
infoworld.com
13/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: A mixed bag of Windows 8 whatsit
P
pcworld.com
14/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: Tablet, meet desktop
C
cnet.com
12/12/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review: Laptop power in a tablet package
T
trustedreviews.com
14/05/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review
U
uk.pcmag.com
09/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700-6465 - Review 2013
M
mobiletechreview.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review - MobileTechReview
E
expertreviews.co.uk
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review | Expert Reviews
T
techradar.com
06/02/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 review - TechRadar
W
wired.com
30/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Iconia W700 - WIRED
A
arstechnica.com
22/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer's Iconia W700 is an Ultrabook in a tablet's body
I
ibtimes.co.uk
21/01/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 Review | IBTimes UK
P
pcwelt.de
05/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 im Test - PC-WELT
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
04/04/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 im Test | NETZWELT
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
20/12/2012
Summary of the review
Test Iconia Tab W700 d’Acer: un peu trop hybride
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexpertoit.com
25/10/2012
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700P, análisis a fondo - tuexpertoIT.com
(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
15/03/2013
Summary of the review
Acer W700 [Análisis Completo en Español] - Geeknetic
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexperto.com
29/07/2013
Summary of the review
tuexperto.com: Acer Iconia Tab W700, lo hemos probado(computerhoy.com) | 02/02/2013 | Computer Hoy: Acer Iconia W700: Windows 8 en 11 pulgadas
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
07/07/2013
Summary of the review
Xataka: Acer Iconia W700, prueba a fondo
(Translated)Show original
B
batista70phone.com
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia W700 (i3): Caratteristiche e Test batteria
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
05/01/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Iconia Tab W700 Windows 8 tablet
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
23/12/2012
Summary of the review
Grondige en onafhankelijke Acer Iconia Tab W700-reviews
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
20/06/2013
Summary of the review
Review Acer Iconia W700-53334G12as Tablet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 57 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 127 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB)

  • High-resolution 11.6-inch Full HD (1920x1080) IPS display with excellent viewing angles and clarity
  • Strong performance from Intel Core i3/i5 processors, making it significantly faster than typical Atom or ARM tablets
  • Excellent battery life for a Windows 8 device, often lasting 6 to 8 hours depending on usage
  • Premium build quality with a sturdy, unibody aluminum chassis
  • Comprehensive bundle of accessories often included, such as a Bluetooth keyboard, leather carrying case, and desktop dock
  • Full Windows 8/10 experience allowing the installation of standard desktop applications

What we don't like about Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Bulky and heavy design (over 2 pounds) makes it difficult to hold as a traditional tablet for long periods
  • The included plastic cradle/dock is often described as cheap, non-adjustable, and cumbersome to transport
  • Lack of an SD or microSD card slot for expandable storage
  • High display resolution can make icons and text in standard Windows desktop mode too small to navigate easily by touch
  • Limited connectivity on the tablet itself, featuring only a single USB 3.0 port
  • Presence of pre-installed 'bloatware' from Acer that some users found intrusive or unnecessary

Verdict

The Acer Iconia W700 (64GB SSD + 4GB RAM) is an 11.6-inch Windows 8 tablet designed to bridge the gap between a portable slate and an Ultrabook. Key specifications include a Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS touchscreen, an Intel Core i3 (Ivy Bridge) processor, and a premium unibody aluminium chassis. Main pros include its vibrant 1080p display with wide viewing angles, a full-sized USB 3.0 port for easy peripheral connectivity, and an impressive battery life for its class, often reaching 7 to 9 hours. However, it is relatively heavy and bulky for a tablet at approximately 950 grams, lacks an SD card slot for storage expansion, and can be difficult to navigate in desktop mode without a mouse due to small UI elements on the high-resolution screen.

Compare Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia W700 (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found