OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,060RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:12.5 inchesChipset:Intel Core m3-6Y30

Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB)
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.2

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 62% of tablets
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

4.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 98%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.5

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.3

Software

5%

5.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–²Better than 54%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models

6.2

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

7.6

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
5 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 65%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • acer-aspire-switch-12-s-4gb-128gb
acer-aspire-switch-12-s-4gb-128gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £1,060
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB)

Based on 5 · 5

Reviewers praise the comfortable keyboard, trackpad and ports, but agree the display disappoints and battery life is short.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

6.5

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.5

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.3

Software

5%

5.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

4.9

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 128 GB of internal storage, which is more than 56.2% of tablets and equal to 20% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Intel Core m3-6Y30
This tablet runs on Intel Core m3-6Y30, which is more advanced than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a 1920×1080 screen, which is less sharp than 61.1% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
176 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 176 ppi, which is lower than 75.7% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 4
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 4, which is more durable than 91.4% of tablets and the same as 2.4% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,550 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,550 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 77.9% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 45 W, which is faster than 83.8% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
800 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 800 g, which is heavier than 94.8% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.4% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 3, which is more than 87.8% of tablets and equal to 5.3% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 2.4 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports Thunderbolt
    This tablet supports Thunderbolt, the average tablet does not. 2.3% of tablets support Thunderbolt.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SATA storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SATA vs eMMC
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SATA storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SATA vs eMMC
  • 2x more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 2x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 30.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (850 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.4 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 4 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 30 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (430 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    430 nits vs 400 nits
  • 40 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (441 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    441 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Supports Thunderbolt
    This tablet supports Thunderbolt, the average tablet does not. 2.3% of tablets support Thunderbolt.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    micro-HDMI port
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.6% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 2 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (3 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    3 vs 1
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 31.1% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,550 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,550 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • 20.4% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (176 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    176 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 11.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    7.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    5 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.0
  • 4.08x more expensive
    Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£1,060 vs £260).
    £1,060 vs £260
  • 22.7% worse value for money
    Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.15 vs 7.6).
    6.15 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 3 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2016 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    February 2016
    2016 vs 2019
  • 20.4% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (176 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    176 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,920×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 31.1% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,550 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,550 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 138.1 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (313.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    313.4 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Tablet-News.com
≈ estimated
17/12/2016
Hands-on review · 3D apps, keyboard and connectivity tests
Verdict
Acer Aspire Switch 12 S is a niche tablet for 3D work and creators, not for most buyers.
8.0
Živě cz
≈ estimated
01/04/2016
First look · event hands-on, keyboard and ports
Verdict
Acer Aspire Switch 12 S looks very good at first sight, though it sits in the premium price segment.
Overview video
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.3
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
03/07/2016
Lab test · Core m3 detachable
Verdict
The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S handles office work and browsing easily, matching the Surface Pro 4, but its 128GB drive leaves only about 90GB free.
8.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
09/05/2016
Hands-on review · Graphics dock hybrid
Verdict
The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S is a premium-feeling 12-inch hybrid with a big keyboard and graphics dock for gaming, but its screen misses almost half of web colours.
8.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
09/05/2016
Hands-on review · Detachable hybrid
Verdict
The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S is a well-built, light hybrid whose graphics dock adds gaming power, but its limited color coverage and flip-around hinge hold it back.
7.0
tablet-news.com
≈ estimated
11/02/2017
Hands-on review · 3D camera hybrid
Verdict
The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S is a niche 12.5-inch hybrid whose 3D camera suits 3D printing and fashion work better than everyday productivity.
7.0
tabletblog.de
≈ estimated
29/02/2016
Hands-on test · Premium 2-in-1
Verdict
The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S is a sturdy all-aluminium tablet whose firm keyboard dock works like a notebook, though its price feels high for near-identical hardware.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB)

  • Premium aluminum build that feels solid and sturdy
  • Excellent display with high brightness, contrast, and wide viewing angles
  • Versatile 'Snap Hinge Gold' design allowing multiple usage modes
  • Diverse connectivity options including a Thunderbolt 3/USB-C port
  • Backlit keyboard with a responsive and spacious trackpad
  • Silent, fanless operation thanks to the Intel Core m processor

What customers don't like about Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB)

  • High retail price compared to more powerful competitors
  • Disappointing battery life that often fails to last a full workday
  • Average color gamut coverage (low sRGB accuracy) for professional creative work
  • Limited performance of the Core m3/m5 chips for heavy tasks or gaming
  • Loud and somewhat spongy keyboard feedback reported by some users
  • Meager camera quality for both front and rear-facing lenses

Verdict

The Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (SW7-272) is a premium 2-in-1 detachable tablet featuring a 12.5-inch Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS touchscreen and an Intel Core m3-6Y30 Skylake processor. Its core specifications include 4GB of LPDDR3 RAM, a 128GB SSD, and a fanless design that ensures silent operation. Key characteristics include the magnetic 'Snap Hinge Gold' for seamless docking, a backlit keyboard, and advanced connectivity such as Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C), micro-HDMI, and an Intel RealSense 3D camera. Main pros include its sturdy anodized aluminium chassis, high-contrast display with no PWM flickering, and versatile usage modes. However, cons include relatively short battery life, a loud and somewhat spongy keyboard feel, and limited performance for heavy multitasking or gaming.

Compare Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Aspire Switch 12 S (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found