OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Steamfast SF-210 Review | 61 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Heat-up time:180 secondsPower rating:900 WWeight:1.18 kg

Steamfast SF-210 Review: Compare 61 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Steam Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of products in the Steam Cleaners category, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best products in the Steam Cleaners category.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 99% of steam-cleaners
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Steam Cleaners category across these key areas: Performance, Tank, Versatility, Accessories, Design, Safety.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Steam Cleaners category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

28%

6.9

Performance

24%

2.5

Tank

21%

7.2

Versatility

10%

5.8

Accessories

9%

6.6

Design

8%

5.9

Safety

â–¼Worse than 94% of steam-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Steam Cleaners category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Steam Cleaners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
  • steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210
steamfast-sf-210

Best prices

    N/A~ £35
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Steamfast SF-210 is a compact, 900-watt handheld steam cleaner weighing 2.6 pounds, equipped with a 6-ounce (180 ml) water reservoir, a 12.5-foot power cord, and an on-demand steam trigger. Key advantages include its chemical-free multi-surface sanitation capability, an integrated heating indicator light, a swift 3-minute heat-up time, and 6 versatile attachments—including a 28-inch extension hose, jet nozzle, brass brush, and nylon brushes. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively limited 8-minute continuous steam runtime per fill, the lack of an automatic shut-off feature, and user reports citing lower pressure delivery for highly demanding cleaning tasks.

Technical Specifications of steam cleaner Steamfast SF-210

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Steam Cleaners category across these key areas: Performance, Tank, Versatility, Accessories, Design, Safety.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Steam Cleaners category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components:

28%

6.9

Performance

24%

2.5

Tank

21%

7.2

Versatility

10%

5.8

Accessories

9%

6.6

Design

8%

5.9

Safety

5.7
Steamfast SF-210 has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than 93.7% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Steam Cleaners category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Steam Cleaners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by products in the Steam Cleaners category.
When it matters
When you prefer products in the Steam Cleaners category that have been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Steamfast SF-210 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 86.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Steamfast SF-210 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 86.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the overall score of products in the Steam Cleaners category with their prices.
When it matters
When you are comparing products in the Steam Cleaners category and want a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.0
Steamfast SF-210 has a value-for-money score of 7 points, which is lower than 95.8% of products in this category.
Steam pressure
?
Steam temperature
?
Steam flow rate
?
Heat-up time
180 seconds
Heat-up time
180 seconds
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
Market range: <15 seconds – >540 seconds
This steam cleaner has a heat-up time of 180 seconds, which is longer than that of 50.4% of steam cleaners and matches that of 9.1% of steam cleaners.
Continuous steam time
8 minutes
Continuous steam time
8 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <11.5 minutes – >50 minutes
This steam cleaner has a continuous steam time of 8 minutes, which is shorter than that of 92.4% of steam cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This steam cleaner is corded only, unlike 4.2% of steam cleaners.
Action radius
4.5 m
Action radius
4.5 m
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <5 m – >8.5 m
This steam cleaner has an action radius of 4.5 m, which is shorter than that of 92.5% of steam cleaners.
Stainless steel boiler
no
Stainless steel boiler
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a stainless steel boiler, unlike 22.5% of steam cleaners.
Power rating
900 W
Power rating
900 W
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <1.1k W – >2.1k W
This steam cleaner has a power rating of 900 W, which is lower than that of 97.2% of steam cleaners and matches that of 0.7% of steam cleaners.
Water tank capacity
177 ml
Water tank capacity
177 ml
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <300 ml – >1.9k ml
This steam cleaner has a water tank capacity of 177 ml, which is smaller than that of 99.2% of steam cleaners and matches that of 0.8% of steam cleaners.
Show more
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 8% of models
This steam cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers, as are 91.6% of steam cleaners.
Product type
handheld steam cleaner
Convertible handheld design
no
Convertible handheld design
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a convertible handheld design, unlike 18.2% of steam cleaners.
Steam vacuum function
no
Steam vacuum function
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a steam vacuum function, unlike 12.6% of steam cleaners.
Floor nozzle type
none
Show more
Accessory count
6
Accessory count
6
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <4 – >17
This steam cleaner includes 6 accessories, which is fewer than the number included with 70.4% of steam cleaners and the same as the number included with 2.1% of steam cleaners.
Mop pads included
0
Mop pads included
0
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This steam cleaner includes 0 mop pads, which is fewer than the number included with 88.1% of steam cleaners and the same as the number included with 11.9% of steam cleaners.
Carpet glider included
no
Carpet glider included
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a carpet glider, unlike 31.5% of steam cleaners.
Extension tubes / wands
no
Extension tubes / wands
no
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This steam cleaner does not have extension tubes or wands, unlike 56.6% of steam cleaners.
Extension hose
yes
Extension hose
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This steam cleaner has an extension hose, as do 18.9% of steam cleaners.
Show more
Wheels
no
Wheels
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This steam cleaner does not have wheels, unlike 55.9% of steam cleaners.
Volume
?
Weight
1.18 kg
Weight
1.18 kg
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <1.18 kg – >7 kg
This steam cleaner weighs 1.18 kg, which is lighter than 90.2% of steam cleaners.
Width
?
Height
209.6 mm
Show more
Child safety lock
no
Child safety lock
no
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a child safety lock, unlike 60.1% of steam cleaners.
Safety valve / safety cap
yes
Safety valve / safety cap
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This steam cleaner has a safety valve or safety cap, as do 60.1% of steam cleaners.
Auto shut-off
no
Auto shut-off
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This steam cleaner does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 13.3% of steam cleaners.
Trigger lock / continuous steam lock
no
Trigger lock / continuous steam lock
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a trigger lock for continuous steam, unlike 26.6% of steam cleaners.
Descaling system
no
Descaling system
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This steam cleaner does not have a descaling system, unlike 25.9% of steam cleaners.
Show more

Steamfast SF-210 vs the average steam cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceTankVersatilityAccessoriesDesignSafety
  • Includes an extension hose
    Extension hose
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This steam cleaner has an extension hose, while the average steam cleaner does not have an extension hose.
  • 69.8% lighter
    Weight
    1.18 kg
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <1.18 kg – >7 kg
    40% lighter: this steam cleaner is lighter than the average steam cleaner (1.2 kg vs 3.91 kg).
    1.18 kg vs 3.91 kg
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Steamfast SF-210 is cheaper than the average steam cleaner (£35 vs £130).
    £35 vs £130
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Steamfast SF-210 is cheaper than the average steam cleaner (£35 vs £130).
    £35 vs £130
  • Includes an extension hose
    Extension hose
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This steam cleaner has an extension hose, while the average steam cleaner does not have an extension hose.
  • 69.8% lighter
    Weight
    1.18 kg
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <1.18 kg – >7 kg
    40% lighter: this steam cleaner is lighter than the average steam cleaner (1.2 kg vs 3.91 kg).
    1.18 kg vs 3.91 kg
  • No continuous refill system
    Continuous refill system
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a continuous refill system, while the average steam cleaner has a continuous refill system.
  • 623 ml smaller water tank capacity
    Water tank capacity
    177 ml
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <300 ml – >1.9k ml
    This steam cleaner has a smaller water tank capacity than the average steam cleaner (177 ml vs 800 ml).
    177 ml vs 800 ml
  • Not suitable for upholstery and fabrics
    Suitable for upholstery / fabrics
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This steam cleaner is not suitable for upholstery and fabrics, while the average steam cleaner is suitable for the same use.
  • No adjustable steam output
    Adjustable steam output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have adjustable steam output, while the average steam cleaner has adjustable steam output.
  • No upholstery / fabric tool
    Upholstery / fabric tool
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have an upholstery or fabric tool, while the average steam cleaner has an upholstery or fabric tool.
  • Cannot steam garments
    Garment steaming capability
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This steam cleaner cannot steam garments, while the average steam cleaner can do this.
  • Cannot be parked upright
    Self-standing / parking position
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This steam cleaner cannot stand upright for parking, while the average steam cleaner can stand upright for parking.
  • No water-level indicator
    Water level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a water-level indicator, while the average steam cleaner has a water-level indicator.
  • 7.51x less popular
    Steamfast SF-210 is less popular than the average steam cleaner (1 vs 7.5).
    1 vs 7.51
  • 14.3% worse value for money
    Steamfast SF-210 offers worse value for money than the average steam cleaner (6.97 vs 8).
    6.97 vs 7.97
  • 0% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Steam Cleaners category.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how products in the Steam Cleaners category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Steamfast SF-210
    the average steam cleaner
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Steamfast SF-210 has a lower user score than the average steam cleaner (8.00 vs 8.004).
    8 vs 8
  • No adjustable steam output
    Adjustable steam output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have adjustable steam output, while the average steam cleaner has adjustable steam output.
  • 12 minutes shorter continuous steam time
    Continuous steam time
    8 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <11.5 minutes – >50 minutes
    This steam cleaner has a shorter continuous steam time than the average steam cleaner (8 minutes vs 20 minutes).
    8 minutes vs 20 minutes
  • 1 fewer steam levels
    Steam levels
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <2 – >5
    This steam cleaner offers fewer steam levels than the average steam cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 30 seconds longer heat-up time
    Heat-up time
    180 seconds
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <15 seconds – >540 seconds
    This steam cleaner has a longer heat-up time than the average steam cleaner (180 seconds vs 150 seconds).
    180 seconds vs 150 seconds
  • No continuous refill system
    Continuous refill system
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a continuous refill system, while the average steam cleaner has a continuous refill system.
  • 623 ml smaller water tank capacity
    Water tank capacity
    177 ml
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <300 ml – >1.9k ml
    This steam cleaner has a smaller water tank capacity than the average steam cleaner (177 ml vs 800 ml).
    177 ml vs 800 ml
  • No water-level indicator
    Water level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a water-level indicator, while the average steam cleaner has a water-level indicator.
  • 1.29 m shorter hose
    Hose length
    0.71 m
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
    This steam cleaner has a shorter hose than the average steam cleaner (0.7 m vs 2 m).
    0.71 m vs 2 m
  • 2.5 m shorter action radius
    Action radius
    4.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >8.5 m
    This steam cleaner has a shorter action radius than the average steam cleaner (4.5 m vs 7 m).
    4.5 m vs 7 m
  • 823 ml smaller boiler capacity
    Boiler capacity
    177 ml
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <200 ml – >1.8k ml
    This steam cleaner has a smaller boiler capacity than the average steam cleaner (177 ml vs 1000 ml).
    177 ml vs 1,000 ml
  • 600 W lower power rating
    Power rating
    900 W
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <1.1k W – >2.1k W
    This steam cleaner has a lower power rating than the average steam cleaner (900 W vs 1500 W).
    900 W vs 1,500 W
  • 1.19 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    3.81 m
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <4 m – >7.5 m
    This steam cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average steam cleaner (3.8 m vs 5 m).
    3.81 m vs 5 m
  • Not suitable for upholstery and fabrics
    Suitable for upholstery / fabrics
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This steam cleaner is not suitable for upholstery and fabrics, while the average steam cleaner is suitable for the same use.
  • Cannot steam garments
    Garment steaming capability
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This steam cleaner cannot steam garments, while the average steam cleaner can do this.
  • Not suitable for glass and windows
    Suitable for glass / windows
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This steam cleaner is not suitable for glass and windows, while the average steam cleaner is suitable for the same use.
  • No swivel / flexible floor head
    Swivel / flexible floor head
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a swivel or flexible floor head, while the average steam cleaner has a swivel or flexible floor head.
  • No upholstery / fabric tool
    Upholstery / fabric tool
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have an upholstery or fabric tool, while the average steam cleaner has an upholstery or fabric tool.
  • No extension tubes / wands
    Extension tubes / wands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have extension tubes or wands, while the average steam cleaner has extension tubes or wands.
  • No scraper / grout tool
    Scraper / grout tool
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a scraper or grout tool, while the average steam cleaner has a scraper or grout tool.
  • 3 fewer accessories
    Accessory count
    6
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <4 – >17
    This steam cleaner includes fewer accessories than the average steam cleaner (6 vs 9).
    6 vs 9
  • 1 fewer mop pads
    Mop pads included
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This steam cleaner includes fewer mop pads than the average steam cleaner (0 vs 1).
    0 vs 1
  • Cannot be parked upright
    Self-standing / parking position
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This steam cleaner cannot stand upright for parking, while the average steam cleaner can stand upright for parking.
  • No wheels
    Wheels
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have wheels, while the average steam cleaner has wheels.
  • 2 years older
    Release date
    2011
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This steam cleaner was released earlier than the average steam cleaner.
    2,011 vs 2,018
  • No child safety lock
    Child safety lock
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This steam cleaner does not have a child safety lock, while the average steam cleaner has a child safety lock.

Graphic comparison of Steamfast SF-210 and other products in the Steam Cleaners category

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Steamfast SF-210?

  • Lightweight and compact design makes it highly portable and easy to store.
  • Heats up quickly, typically ready to use within 3 minutes.
  • Effectively loosens tough grease, grime, and dirt in hard-to-reach nooks and crannies.
  • Excellent for sanitizing and deep cleaning tile, grout, and bathroom areas without chemicals.
  • Comes with a useful selection of versatile accessories, including a flexible extension hose.
  • Affordable price point offers good value for small cleaning tasks.

What customers dislike about Steamfast SF-210?

  • Small 6-ounce water tank capacity runs out quickly and requires frequent refilling.
  • Steam pressure is relatively weak and may struggle with heavily baked-on or tough stains.
  • Steam delivery can be intermittent, requiring the unit to frequently pause and heat back up during use.
  • Included plastic accessories feel somewhat cheap or lower in quality compared to the main unit.
  • Not highly effective on certain surfaces like heavy soap scum or stubborn oil lines.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Steamfast SF-210 with other products in the Steam Cleaners category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)