OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Smeg SMF04 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£390Motor power:800 WBowl capacity:4.8 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:9.6 kg

Smeg SMF04 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 3 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Smeg SMF04
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

60%

6.2

Technical score

15%

8.7

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.2

Reviews score

â–¼Worse than 54% of stand mixers
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

35%

6.3

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.9

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

6.2

Design

10%

10

Safety

â–¼Worse than 67%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
â–²Better than 50%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

â–²Better than 58%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • smeg-smf04
smeg-smf04
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Smeg SMF04

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

35%

6.3

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.9

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

6.2

Design

10%

10

Safety

6.2
Reviews score
8.2
User score
8.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

6.9
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
800 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 800 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 8.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.8 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.8 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 7.1% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
lever
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
37.8 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 37.8 cm, which is taller than 72.7% of stand mixers and equal in height to 3.2% of stand mixers.
Width
40.5 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 40.5 cm in width, which is wider than 91.3% of stand mixers and equal in width to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Depth
22.1 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 22.1 cm, which is shallower than 84.8% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Weight
9.6 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 9.6 kg, which is heavier than 69.2% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 1.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
die-cast aluminium
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Smeg SMF04 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 13.0% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 58% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.7
  • 9.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.2 vs 7.5
  • 13.0% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 58% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.7
  • 9.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.2 vs 7.5
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 12.5 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 28% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.6 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.6 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L
  • 1 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (76 dB vs 75 dB).
    76 dB vs 75 dB
  • 6.7% worse value for money
    Smeg SMF04 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.93 vs 7.4).
    6.93 vs 7.4
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Smeg SMF04 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£390 vs £210).
    £390 vs £210
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 1 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (76 dB vs 75 dB).
    76 dB vs 75 dB
  • 12.5 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 28% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.6 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.6 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
06/05/2026
Hands-on test · Bread baking
Verdict
The Smeg SMF04 is a stylish mixer with a strong 750-watt motor for dense doughs, but its plastic shell and wobbling bowl leave it short of KitchenAid's performance.
8.0
altroconsumo.it
≈ estimated
2026
Lab test · Stand mixer
Verdict
The Smeg SMF04 posted good overall lab results and a roomy bowl for family-size batches, though it is heavy and has no timer.
8.0
soshomegarden.com
✓ explicit
19/08/2026
Hands-on test · Home baking
Verdict
The Smeg SMF04 is a stable, stylish mixer with a gentle start and large bowl, best for regular home baking, though it is heavy.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Smeg SMF04

  • Beautiful 1950s retro-inspired design that functions as a kitchen centerpiece.
  • Smooth Start function builds up speed gradually to reduce ingredient splashing and mess.
  • SteadyMix technology ensures consistent mixing performance even under a heavy load.
  • Thorough edge-to-edge ingredient incorporation due to its efficient planetary mixing action.
  • Ergonomic 4.8-litre stainless steel bowl with a comfortable handle that is easy to lock and unlock.
  • Front attachment hub allows expansion for extra accessories like pasta rollers and meat grinders.

What customers don't like about Smeg SMF04

  • High price point compared to competitive mixers with similar performance capabilities.
  • Can operate with noticeable noise and vibration during high-speed tasks.
  • The tilt-head mechanism can experience slight shaking or bouncing when handling denser, heavy doughs.
  • The placement of the speed control lever on top means flour and spilled ingredients can drop into the groove.
  • Fewer specialized attachment options available on the market compared to dominant brands like KitchenAid.
  • The base has open crevices that can make it tricky and time-consuming to clean thoroughly after a spill.

Verdict

The Smeg SMF04 is a 1950s retro-style tilt-head stand mixer built with a durable die-cast aluminum body and equipped with a 600W direct-drive motor, 10 precision speed settings, and a 4.8-liter (5-quart) stainless steel bowl with an ergonomic handle. Its main characteristics include an advanced SteadyMix system that maintains consistent speed under heavy loads, a professional planetary mixing action, and a Smooth Start function that gradually accelerates speed to minimize ingredient splashing. Key pros include excellent mixing stability, a comprehensive accessory kit (wire whisk, flat beater, dough hook, and Tritan Renew pouring shield), and a front accessory port for expanding culinary versatility. However, some cons include its premium price point, an exterior design that can be tricky to clean due to exposed base crevices, and a wire whisk attachment that is not dishwasher-safe.

Compare Smeg SMF04 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Smeg SMF04 and other stand mixers

No results found