OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Kenwood Chef KVC3173S review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£400Motor power:1000 WBowl capacity:4.6 LNumber of speed levels:?Number of included attachments:5Weight:7.3 kg

Kenwood Chef KVC3173S Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Kenwood Chef KVC3173S
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

60%

7.2

Technical score

15%

9.0

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 83% of stand mixers
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 59%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.6

Bowl

15%

9.1

Accessories

10%

8.5

Design

10%

10

Safety

â–²Better than 79%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

8.9

Popularity

â–²Better than 79%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kenwood-chef-kvc3173s
kenwood-chef-kvc3173s
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Kenwood Chef KVC3173S

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

35%

6.7

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.6

Bowl

15%

9.1

Accessories

10%

8.5

Design

10%

10

Safety

7.2
Reviews score
7.7
User score
9.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

6.8

Price

7.3
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
1,000 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 37.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 21% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
?
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.6 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.6 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 75.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 1.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
5
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 5 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 82.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 4.7% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
30 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 30 cm, which is lower than the height of 81.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 2.7% of stand mixers.
Width
24 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 24 cm in width, which is narrower than 69.9% of stand mixers and equal in width to 6.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
27.5 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 27.5 cm, which is shallower than 62.2% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Weight
7.3 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 7.3 kg, which is lighter than 51.4% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 1.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
metal
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Kenwood Chef KVC3173S vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 2 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (5 vs 3).
    5 vs 3
  • 5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (30 cm vs 35 cm).
    30 cm vs 35 cm
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 16.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 79% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.9

    Popularity

    9.0 vs 7.7
  • 3.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (27.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    27.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.01 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 2.7% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 16.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 79% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.9

    Popularity

    9.0 vs 7.7
  • 5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (30 cm vs 35 cm).
    30 cm vs 35 cm
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 3.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (27.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    27.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.01 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 2.7% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 2 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (5 vs 3).
    5 vs 3
  • Does not have soft start
    This stand mixer does not include soft start (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 0.4 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.6 L vs 5 L).
    4.6 L vs 5 L
  • 90.5% more expensive
    Kenwood Chef KVC3173S is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£400 vs £210).
    £400 vs £210
  • 1% worse value for money
    Kenwood Chef KVC3173S has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.32 vs 7.4).
    7.32 vs 7.4
  • 90.5% more expensive
    Kenwood Chef KVC3173S is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£400 vs £210).
    £400 vs £210
  • 1% worse value for money
    Kenwood Chef KVC3173S has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.32 vs 7.4).
    7.32 vs 7.4
  • Does not have soft start
    This stand mixer does not include soft start (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 0.4 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.6 L vs 5 L).
    4.6 L vs 5 L

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kenwood Chef KVC3173S

  • Comes with high-quality core tools including a stainless steel K-beater, whisk, and dough hook
  • Versatile multi-functionality thanks to bundled high-speed blender and meat mincer attachments
  • Robust and stable build quality with reliable non-slip rubber feet that minimize walking on the counter
  • Powerful 1000W motor that smoothly maintains speed under regular baking loads
  • Generous 4.6-litre stainless steel bowl capacity suitable for handling typical family-sized batches
  • Includes a practical splash guard with an opening flap to easily add ingredients without making a mess

What customers don't like about Kenwood Chef KVC3173S

  • The plastic splash guard is delicate and can be prone to cracking over time
  • Bulky footprint and heavy design make it difficult to move and store away if counter space is limited
  • Can struggle or move around on the counter when tasked with kneading exceptionally heavy or large bread doughs
  • Does not include advanced modern features found in premium models, such as integrated weighing scales or a digital timer display
  • Standard bowl lacks side handles, which can make lifting and pouring heavy mixtures awkward for some users

Verdict

The Kenwood Chef KVC3173S is a robust, metal-bodied stand mixer powered by a 1000-watt motor featuring planetary mixing action and step-less electronic speed control with a pulse function. This versatile package includes a 4.6-litre stainless steel bowl, a thermo-resist glass bowl, essential baking tools (K-beater, whisk, dough hook), a 1.6-litre glass blender, and a multi-disc meat mincer attachment. Its primary advantages are its exceptional multi-functional utility, durable construction, and uniform mixing capability. However, its substantial 7.3 kg weight makes it cumbersome to move around, and it lacks newer high-end features such as an integrated weighing scale or a touchscreen control panel.

Compare Kenwood Chef KVC3173S with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kenwood Chef KVC3173S and other stand mixers

No results found