OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Smeg SMF02 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£380Motor power:800 WBowl capacity:4.8 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:9.18 kg

Smeg SMF02 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications, 5 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Smeg SMF02
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

60%

6.4

Technical score

15%

9.1

User score

15%

8.4

List score

10%

8.6

Reviews score

▲Better than 70% of stand mixers
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

▼Worse than 62%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.0

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

6.3

Design

10%

10

Safety

▼Worse than 56%
8.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (5)
4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
▲Better than 73%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 84% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

9.2

Popularity

▲Better than 84%
8.4

List score

List score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
▲Better than 85%
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
  • smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
smeg-smf02
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Smeg SMF02

Based on 4 · 1

Reviewers agree it mixes well and stays steady on the counter, and most find it easy to clean, with few complaints.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Smeg SMF02

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

35%

7.4

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.0

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

6.3

Design

10%

10

Safety

6.4
Reviews score
8.6
User score
9.1
List score
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

7.2
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
800 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 800 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 8.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Bowl capacity
4.8 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.8 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 7.1% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
2 kg
Market range: <1.3 kg – >5 kg
This stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2 kg, which is smaller than 56.1% of stand mixers and equal to 14% of stand mixers.
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
What reviewers say
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
lever
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
37.8 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 37.8 cm, which is taller than 72.7% of stand mixers and equal in height to 3.2% of stand mixers.
Width
40.2 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 40.2 cm in width, which is wider than 89.5% of stand mixers and equal in width to 1.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
22.1 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 22.1 cm, which is shallower than 84.8% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Weight
9.18 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 9.18 kg, which is heavier than 63.6% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
die-cast aluminium
Show more
What reviewers say
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Smeg SMF02 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 84% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.2

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.7
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 14.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (5)
    4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.6 vs 7.5
  • 1.2% higher list score
    List score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
    8.4 vs 8.3
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 84% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.2

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.7
  • 14.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (5)
    4 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.6 vs 7.5
  • 1.2% higher list score
    List score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
    8.4 vs 8.3
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 12.2 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.2 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.2 cm vs 28 cm
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 22.4% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.18 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L
  • 81% more expensive
    Smeg SMF02 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£380 vs £210).
    £380 vs £210
  • 2.2% worse value for money
    Smeg SMF02 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.23 vs 7.4).
    7.23 vs 7.4
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 12.2 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.2 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.2 cm vs 28 cm
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 22.4% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.18 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Yo no leo manuales
≈ estimated
01/03/2026
Hands-on review · over a year of home use
Verdict
Smeg SMF02 works very well for home use, with strong power and a solid build for the price.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
08/11/2019
Hands-on test · Retro stand mixer
Verdict
The Smeg SMF02 is a good-looking mixer that performs well, especially for kneading and batters, but its speed dial is hard to read.
8.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
27/01/2022
Hands-on test · Pastry mixer
Verdict
The Smeg SMF02 is a stable, quiet mixer that whips egg whites and mixes sponge batter evenly, though its tool height can't be adjusted.
8.0
cuissonsanshuile.com
≈ estimated
03/05/2024
Kitchen test · Pastry mixer
Verdict
The Smeg SMF02 is a quiet, sturdy pastry mixer whose whisk and kneading are excellent, though its speed knob is awkward and the price is high.
9.0
shopping.giallozafferano.it
≈ estimated
20/09/2022
Owner review · Retro stand mixer
Verdict
The Smeg SMF02RDEU is a sturdy, stable mixer for family baking, though it's noisy at top speed and sits in the higher price bracket.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Smeg SMF02

  • Beautiful, iconic 1950s retro design that looks great as countertop decor.
  • Powerful 800W motor easily handles heavy and sticky bread or pizza doughs.
  • Smooth Start function gradually builds up speed to prevent ingredient splashing.
  • Sturdy die-cast aluminum body and heavy base reduce vibrations and keep it stable.
  • User-friendly speed control lever with 10 variable options for precise adjustments.
  • Large 4.8-liter stainless steel bowl with a comfortable ergonomic handle.
  • Extra-long chute on the pouring shield makes adding ingredients clean and easy.

What customers don't like about Smeg SMF02

  • Premium price point makes it significantly more expensive than average mixers.
  • Leaves a noticeable gap between the standard attachments and the bottom of the bowl.
  • Requires manual scraping or purchasing a separate flex-edge beater to combine dry ingredients at the base.
  • Mixer head can shake or knock around when working through chunkier cookie doughs.
  • Unsealed nooks and crannies around the attachment hubs and speed lever can trap flour and spills.
  • Flaking or peeling paint has been reported on the anodized aluminum attachments over time.
  • Fewer optional culinary attachments are available compared to competitors like KitchenAid.

Verdict

The Smeg SMF02 is a 1950s retro-style stand mixer featuring an 800-watt direct-drive motor, an optimized planetary mixing action, and a 4.8-liter polished stainless steel bowl. Main characteristics include its painted die-cast aluminum housing, safety tilt-head lock, and a stainless steel lever offering 10 variable speed levels paired with a Smooth Start function to prevent ingredient splashing. Key pros include its exceptional motor power for handling heavy doughs, eye-catching premium aesthetic, and the inclusion of a specialized flex edge beater alongside standard attachments like a wire whisk, flat beater, and dough hook. On the downside, some components like the whisk require manual hand washing, the speed markings can be difficult to read, and it carries a premium price tag compared to other standard tilt-head models.

Compare Smeg SMF02 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Smeg SMF02 and other stand mixers

No results found