Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£350Motor power:250 WBowl capacity:3.3 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:6.49 kg

KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X Review: Compare 41 technical specifications, 8 expert reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

5.8

Technical score

15%

9.7

User score

15%

5.8

List score

10%

8.9

Reviews score

▼Worse than 72% of stand mixers
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

▼Worse than 81%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

5.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.9

Design

10%

10

Safety

▼Worse than 85%
8.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.8

Average grade

20%

9.2

Popularity

Grades by review (8)
8 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
★Better than 99%
9.7

User score

User score
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

70%

9.5

Rating

30%

10

Popularity

★Better than 100%
5.8

List score

List score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 14 lists (7%)
▲Better than 85%
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
  • kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
kitchenaid-artisan-mini-ksm3316x
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X

Based on 8

Reviewers love the compact, light size and great whipping, but find the bowl too small and awkwardly designed for bigger batches.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

5.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.9

Design

10%

10

Safety

5.8
Reviews score
8.9
User score
9.7
List score
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

6.8
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
250 W
This stand mixer delivers 250 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 99.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Bowl capacity
3.3 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 3.3 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 98.7% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
no
This stand mixer does not have a splash guard, unlike 9.1%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
What reviewers say
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
lever
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
31.2 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 31.2 cm, which is lower than the height of 78.2% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.5% of stand mixers.
Width
19.8 cm
This stand mixer measures 19.8 cm in width, which is narrower than 93.6% of stand mixers and equal in width to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Depth
31.2 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 31.2 cm, which is shallower than 51.6% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Weight
6.49 kg
This stand mixer weighs 6.49 kg, which is lighter than 62.2% of stand mixers.
Body material
die-cast zinc
Show more
What reviewers say
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 8.2 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (19.8 cm vs 28 cm).
    19.8 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.13 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.22 m vs 1.09 m
  • 26.0% higher user score
    User score
    9.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    9.5

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.7 vs 7.7
  • 3.8 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (31.2 cm vs 35 cm).
    31.2 cm vs 35 cm
  • 13.5% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (6.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    6.49 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 18.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.8

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    8 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.9 vs 7.5
  • 0.13 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (31.2 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    31.2 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 26.0% higher user score
    User score
    9.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    9.5

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.7 vs 7.7
  • 18.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.8

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    8 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.9 vs 7.5
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 8.2 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (19.8 cm vs 28 cm).
    19.8 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.13 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.22 m vs 1.09 m
  • 3.8 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (31.2 cm vs 35 cm).
    31.2 cm vs 35 cm
  • 13.5% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (6.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    6.49 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.13 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (31.2 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    31.2 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 750 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (250 W vs 1,000 W).
    250 W vs 1,000 W
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (3.3 L vs 5 L).
    3.3 L vs 5 L
  • 30.1% lower list score
    List score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 14 lists (7%)
    5.8 vs 8.3
  • Does not include a splash guard
    This stand mixer does not include a splash guard (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 8% worse value for money
    KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.85 vs 7.4).
    6.85 vs 7.4
  • 66.7% more expensive
    KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£350 vs £210).
    £350 vs £210
  • 30.1% lower list score
    List score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 14 lists (7%)
    5.8 vs 8.3
  • 8% worse value for money
    KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.85 vs 7.4).
    6.85 vs 7.4
  • 66.7% more expensive
    KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£350 vs £210).
    £350 vs £210
  • 750 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (250 W vs 1,000 W).
    250 W vs 1,000 W
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (3.3 L vs 5 L).
    3.3 L vs 5 L
  • Does not include a splash guard
    This stand mixer does not include a splash guard (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
epicurious.com
≈ estimated
13/09/2016
Hands-on test · Small-batch baking
Verdict
The KitchenAid Artisan Mini handled a full cookie batch and thick pistachio dough without strain, a good fit for keen bakers with small kitchens.
9.0
amummytoo.co.uk
≈ estimated
19/11/2016
Detailed review · Compact mixer
Verdict
The KitchenAid Mini suits small kitchens and small-batch bakers, keeping the Classic's tilt head and attachments in a body 20% smaller.
9.0
techgearlab.com
✓ explicit
15/11/2022
Hands-on test · Small-batch mixer
Verdict
The KitchenAid Artisan Mini kneads and whips well for small batches, but struggles to scrape the bowl fully and loses power in very heavy mixes.
9.5
thekitchn.com
≈ estimated
26/09/2023
Owner review · Home baking
Verdict
The KitchenAid Artisan Mini suits home bakers who make small batches, especially for whipping one egg white or half a cup of cream.
9.0
homesandgardens.com
✓ explicit
18/04/2024
Hands-on test · Compact mixer
Verdict
The KitchenAid Artisan Mini is small but capable, whipping cream fast and kneading bread well, suiting small bakes and cramped counters.
9.0
businessinsider.com
≈ estimated
21/05/2024
Long-term test · Small-kitchen mixer
Verdict
The KitchenAid Mini is a fine choice for small kitchens, beginners and kids, but it shakes at high speed and suits single batches best.
9.0
lacuisinedebibou.fr
≈ estimated
25/11/2021
Owner review · Second-hand purchase
Verdict
The KitchenAid Mini suits tight budgets and small batches, whipping and kneading well, but frequent or big bakes need a bigger mixer.
9.0
lesdelicesdalexandre.fr
≈ estimated
10/12/2019
Long-term use · Compact mixer
Verdict
The KitchenAid Mini is a compact, quiet and reliable mixer for small kitchens, though its bowl lost its handle and its capacity is only just enough.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X

  • Compact footprint takes up less counter space and is perfect for small kitchens
  • Lightweight design (18 lbs) makes it much easier to move and store compared to full-sized models
  • Efficient direct current (DC) motor operates quietly and features durable all-metal gears
  • Includes a work bowl with a convenient handle for easier pouring and handling
  • Comes with a flex edge beater that effectively scrapes the bottom and sides of the bowl
  • Compatible with most standard power hub attachments like pasta rollers and meat grinders

What customers don't like about KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X

  • Limited 3.5-quart bowl capacity is restrictive for large families or double-batch recipes
  • Tends to shake, vibrate, or strain when mixing very dense doughs at high speeds
  • Premium price point that is often comparable to or higher than some full-sized models
  • Does not include a pouring or splatter shield in the box
  • The speed adjustment knob can feel stiff and resistant to slide
  • Incompatible with specific attachments that require a larger bowl, such as the ice cream maker

Verdict

The KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X is a compact tilt-head stand mixer featuring a durable full-metal die-cast construction, a 250-watt DC motor with all-metal gears, a 3.5-quart stainless steel bowl, and 10 mixing speeds with a soft-start feature. Main pros include its space-saving footprint, weighing 25% less (18 lbs) and being 20% smaller than the Classic model while maintaining similar power to process up to 5 dozen cookies, alongside an included flex edge beater and compatibility with over 10 optional hub attachments. However, its main cons include a limited volume capacity that makes it ill-suited for large-batch baking, a tendency to strain under exceptionally heavy or dense doughs, and incompatibility with specific large accessories like the ice cream maker attachment.

Compare KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of KitchenAid Artisan Mini KSM3316X and other stand mixers

No results found