OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.9 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 13 MP

Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB)
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

90%

7.8

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 81% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–²Better than 83%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

25%

7.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.6

Camera

15%

8.8

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

9.3

Software

10%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

â–²Better than 82%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 76%
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
  • motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
motorola-razr-60-12gb-256gb
Best prices
    N/A~ £440
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
12GB + 256GB12GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components:

25%

7.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.6

Camera

15%

8.8

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

9.3

Software

10%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

7.8
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

7.8
Popularity
Popularity
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Popularity:
Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 6.3 points, which is higher than 57.1% of smartphones.
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.9
Brand name
Motorola
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X processor which is faster than processors in 62.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.1% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.6 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.6 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 13 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 13 MP which is higher than that of 59.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 which is wider than that of 80.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
or 1.8 & 2.2 on some sources
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 32 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 42.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
1 physical SIM, 1 eSIM (region dependent, some regions Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM is available)
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.9 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.9 inches which is larger than the screens of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2640 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2640 px which is higher than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
413 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 413 ppi which is higher than that of 70.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Foldable AMOLED, Flexible AMOLED
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 78.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 5.9% of smartphones.
Charging speed
30 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 30 W which is slower than in 61.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
yes
This smartphone supports aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
171.3 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171.3 mm which is taller than 89.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
73.99 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 73.99 mm which is narrower than 84% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.25 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.25 mm which is thinner than 95.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
188 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 188 g which is lighter than 70.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2.8% of smartphones.
Device volume
87,381 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 87,381 cm³ which is smaller than 75.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Catch Me Up, Pay Attention, Remember This, Next Move, Playlist Studio
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 48.8% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (16,047 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    16,047 vs 10,783
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 7.9% better value for money
    Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.91 vs 7.3).
    7.91 vs 7.34
  • 48.8% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (16,047 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    16,047 vs 10,783
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 3.82x higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (2,320 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    2,320 vs 608
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    LPDDR5
    5 vs 4
  • 28.6% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (18 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    18 GB vs 14 GB
  • 95.3% more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8000 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    8,000 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.6 GHz & 4x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.6 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 8.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 20.1% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (3,043 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    3,043 vs 2,533
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Catch Me Up, Pay Attention, Remember This, Next Move, Playlist Studio
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Supports fast boot
    This smartphone supports fast boot, the average smartphone does not. 22.6% of smartphones include fast boot capabilities.
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a front LED flash
    This smartphone features a front-facing LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 7.8% of smartphones include a front flash.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    or 1.8 & 2.2 on some sources
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Includes crash detection
    This smartphone features crash detection, the average smartphone does not. 5.7% of smartphones include automatic crash detection.
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 4.6% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (413 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    413 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (2000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    2,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 295.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1189 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,189 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Supports aptX Lossless
    This smartphone supports aptX Lossless, the average smartphone does not. 12.9% of smartphones include aptX Lossless support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1.05 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.3 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.25 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2.01 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73.99 mm vs 76 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 4.2% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (188 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    188 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • 33.3% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (4 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    4 W vs 6 W
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2133 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 11.3% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (7.1 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    7.1 vs 8
  • 7.7 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 2.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Razr 60
    the average smartphone
    Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.78 vs 8.000).
    7.78 vs 8
  • 33.3% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (4 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    4 W vs 6 W
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2133 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (783 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    783 vs 942
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 7400X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 7400X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.6% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (1,023 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    1,023 vs 1,226
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    2.4
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 10% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 9.1% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    30 W vs 33 W
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • 11.3% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (7.1 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    7.1 vs 8
  • 7.7 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
phonearena.com
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr (2023) Review: A flippin' good deal!
P
pcmag.com
01/11/2023
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr (2023) Review
E
eftm.com
12/08/2025
Summary of the review
motorola razr 60 review: affordable and now even more reliable
P
pcmag.com
18/05/2025
Summary of the review
PCMag | Motorola Razr (2025) Review: A Flip Phone That Doesn't Break the Bank
G
gadgetguy.com.au
12/08/2025
Summary of the review
GadgetGuy | Motorola Razr 60 review: A tougher mid-range flip phone
E
expertreviews.co.uk
22/08/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 review: Style with some substance
T
theverge.com
05/12/2023
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 2023 review: not enough of a good thing
I
ign.com
11/09/2023
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr (2023) Review
P
phonandroid.com
07/08/2024
Summary of the review
This foldable smartphone costs less than 1,000 euros, and it's clear why: Our Motorola Razr 50 review
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
12/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: The market's most affordable foldable smartphone hits the mark
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
29/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: Is a €900 Foldable Smartphone Worth It?
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
[Sans date précise]
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr vs. Motorola Razr 50: Comparison
(Translated)Show original
Z
zdnet.fr
26/05/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: This clamshell smartphone rivals much more expensive high-end devices
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
01/04/2025
Summary of the review
MOTOROLA razr 50 Lab Test: A foldable that's out of shape
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
15/10/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Review: Everything a flagship should be... except for the price?
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
10/09/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: an affordable phone in a premium suit
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
30/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 review: folding for a great price
(Translated)Show original
I
itdaily.be
17/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 60 (Ultra) review: in the pocket
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
03/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: The best flip phone on the market
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Flip phone with a high fun factor
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB)

  • Most affordable entry-point for a modern foldable smartphone
  • Stylish design with premium vegan leather finishes and vibrant Pantone color options
  • Smooth and reliable hinge mechanism that allows for hands-free 'tent' or 'camcorder' modes
  • Large 6.9-inch internal pOLED display with a nearly invisible crease
  • Improved durability with an IP48 rating for dust and water resistance
  • Loud and well-balanced stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support
  • Clean 'Hello UI' software experience that is close to stock Android

What we don't like about Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB)

  • Mid-range performance from the Dimensity 7400X chipset can struggle with heavy multitasking or intensive gaming
  • Camera quality is inconsistent, particularly struggling with moving subjects and low-light conditions
  • Battery life is below segment average for power users, though it may last a day for casual users
  • Limited software support period (typically 3 years of OS updates) compared to flagship competitors
  • External cover display is smaller and less functional than the more expensive 'Ultra' model
  • Slow UFS 2.2 storage can lead to occasional stutters when opening large applications

Verdict

The Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) is a stylish and compact foldable smartphone powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X processor and running Android 15. Key features include a vibrant 6.9-inch FHD+ foldable pOLED main display and a functional 3.6-inch pOLED cover screen, both offering smooth refresh rates (up to 120Hz/90Hz respectively) and high brightness levels (up to 3000 nits on the main screen). It boasts a capable 50MP main camera and 13MP ultrawide lens, a 32MP front camera, and a 4500 mAh battery supporting both 30W wired and 15W wireless charging. Pros include its eye-catching, durable design with an IP48 ingress protection rating, a highly functional external display, good overall camera performance in well-lit conditions, and a strong value proposition in the foldable market. The main cons are that the performance can struggle with graphically intensive tasks or heavy multitasking, the battery life is considered average, there is no expandable storage, and Motorola's software update policy (three OS updates, four years of security patches) is not as extensive as some competitors.

Compare Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found