Motorola Razr 60 (12GB + 256GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
No reviews for this version.
Check reviews from other versions.
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#13 in Best Motorola Phones
#18 in Best Foldable Smartphones
#42 in Best 7-Inch Smartphones
#62 in Best Smartphones Under £500
#63 in Best Mid-Range Smartphones
#146 in Best Large-Screen Smartphones
#147 in Best Android Smartphones
#160 in Best NFC Smartphones
#160 in Best 5G Smartphones
#162 in Best Smartphones
#162 in Best AI Smartphones
#192 in Best Value Smartphones
#564 in Best Battery Life Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
No reviews for this version.
Check reviews from other versions.
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1500
Importance: LOW
Good value: >4000
Importance: LOW
Good value: 8+
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: LOW
Good value: >700
Importance: LOW
Good value: >1000
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >12000
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5000
Importance: LOW
Good value: >1800
Importance: LOW
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: LOW
Good value: 5
Importance: LOW
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: LOW
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >130
Importance: LOW
Good value: >120
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: LOW
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: LOW
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: LOW
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >60 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <45 min
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >12000
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: LOW
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
The Motorola Razr (2023) is a stylish, budget-friendly foldable featuring a 6.9-inch 144Hz pOLED display, a premium vegan leather finish, and a reliable, near-invisible crease. Key pros include a strong 4,200mAh battery that supports 30W charging, solid performance for daily tasks with the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, and a clean Android interface with useful Moto gestures. However, the device compromises on the 1.5-inch external cover screen, which is limited to basic widgets rather than full app support. Camera performance is considered average, often struggling with low-light details, and the hinge has been described as occasionally wobbly, according to the review. Overall, the device is considered a solid, accessible entry into the foldable market, scoring 8/10 for balancing key features with a lower price point. It is recommended for users seeking a compact flip phone experience without the flagship price tag. For more details, visit PhoneArena. PhoneArena
The Motorola Razr (2023) is a budget-friendly foldable phone featuring a vibrant 6.9-inch 144Hz pOLED display and a durable, stylish vegan leather design. Key pros include a robust hinge allowing for versatile, gap-free folding, alongside outstanding battery life that outperforms competitors. However, cons include a restrictive, small 1.5-inch external screen and limited 128GB non-expandable storage.
The Motorola Razr 60, reviewed by EFTM, positions itself as a durable and affordable entry-level foldable, featuring a robust titanium-reinforced hinge and an upgraded IP48 dust and water resistance rating. While maintaining a similar design to its predecessor, it focuses on structural reliability for daily use. The device is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X processor, which provides smooth performance for standard tasks but may struggle with demanding, high-end applications. Key hardware features include a vibrant 6.9-inch 120Hz internal display and a functional 3.6-inch cover screen, complemented by a solid 4,500mAh battery. The 50MP main camera and 13MP ultrawide lens are described as acceptable for casual photography, though they lack the, low-light performance of premium alternatives. Overall, the review highlights the Razr 60 as a stylish, competitively priced choice for users prioritizing durability over top-tier specs. Pros include the improved IP48 rating, the reinforced, sturdy hinge, and competitive battery life, while cons focus on the average camera performance and the modest performance increase.
PCMag's review of the entry-level Motorola Razr (2025) describes it as an affordable folding phone with a desirable compact design, long battery life, and useful dual displays, including a 120Hz inner screen. However, the review notes significant compromises in performance and camera quality compared to competitors. The phone is recommended for users prioritizing form factor and battery over high-end performance and imaging.
GadgetGuy's review describes the Motorola Razr 60 as an affordable, stylish mid-range foldable with compromises on performance, featuring a sturdier hinge and IP48 dust and water resistance. The phone's battery life is a pro, lasting longer than other flip phones due to its 4,500mAh capacity and useful external display, but a con is the lack of a charger or USB-C cable in the box. While the camera system performs well in good lighting and the external screen is a highlight for selfies and app access, a con is poor low-light performance and an issue with excessive, non-disableable HDR processing.
The Motorola Razr 60 is deemed a stylish, iterative update, pairing a durable titanium-reinforced hinge and an IP48 rating with excellent display quality. It features a "fantastic" 3.6in cover screen for app interaction and a vibrant, nearly crease-free internal pOLED panel, making it a compelling, design-focused device. However, the phone is held back by middling processor performance that can lead to overheating during gaming, alongside a lackluster, iterative camera system that struggles in low light. While the camera offers 50MP/13MP sensors and creative features like "camcorder mode," it lacks a dedicated telephoto zoom lens. Despite these drawbacks, the device delivers "brilliant" battery life that ranks among the best for current flip phones.
The Verge review characterizes the 2023 Motorola Razr as an affordable, compact foldable featuring a secure, "vegan leather" finish and, crucially, stellar battery life that easily lasts a full day. However, the device compromises on user experience with a lackluster 1.5-inch external screen that acts primarily as a notification strip, limiting functionality. Performance issues are also noted, with the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset exhibiting minor stutters, alongside a weak IP52 rating for durability.
The IGN review of the Motorola Razr (2023) highlights it as an affordable, high-quality entry into the foldable market, featuring a durable vegan leather finish and a vibrant 6.9-inch 144Hz internal display. Key disadvantages include a limited 1.5-inch outer display, the mid-range Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 processor that struggles with heavy multitasking, and a lower IP52 water-resistance rating compared to competitors. Despite these, the device offers excellent all-day battery life with its 4,200mAh capacity and a capable 64MP main camera.
The Motorola Razr 50 presents a compelling, affordable entry into the foldable market, featuring a premium design with IPX8 water resistance and a large 3.63-inch external display that supports full apps. While the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X offers capable daily performance, it may exhibit occasional UI lag, and the camera system delivers average, rather than flagship-level, results in low-light scenarios. A standout advantage is the battery life; the 4,200mAh cell often outlasts more expensive counterparts, making it a reliable daily driver. The device is highly praised for its functional external screen, which allows for robust, unfolded usage. Conversely, the lack of dust resistance and a slower USB 2.0 port are noted limitations. In summary, the Razr 50 succeeds in bringing premium foldable features down to a more accessible price point, balancing daily performance with, at times, inconsistent camera output. It is ideal for users seeking the flip form factor with strong battery life and a large, functional cover display.
The Motorola Razr 50 stands out as a budget-friendly foldable, featuring a major upgrade with a large, functional 3.6-inch external display that allows for full app usage. It boasts a bright, 120Hz pOLED main screen, solid performance from the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chip, and impressive battery life, though it lacks top-tier gaming power. While offering IPX8 water resistance, the device suffers from a mediocre camera in low light and lacks official dust protection. heise online
The Heise Bestenlisten review identifies the Motorola Razr 50 (razr 60) as a standout, affordable foldable featuring a high-quality design, vegan leather finish, and a significantly improved, functional 3.63-inch external display. While the nearly creaseless 6.9-inch internal OLED screen is a highlight, its extreme aspect ratio can make one-handed usage challenging. Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, the device offers smooth daily performance and solid battery life from its 4,200mAh battery, though it lacks the sheer power of flagship alternatives. The 50MP main camera produces good daylight results, but performance is inconsistent in lower light and lacks a dedicated telephoto lens. Key pros include the expansive external display and IPX8 water resistance, while cons include the average 30W charging speeds and the use of older USB 2.0 connectivity.
The PC-WELT review highlights the Motorola Razr 50 (2024) as a refined, affordable foldable featuring a 3.6-inch functional outer display, a nearly creaseless 6.9-inch main screen, and a durable "vegan leather" finish with IPX8 water resistance. Key advantages include excellent battery life driven by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chipset, a versatile 50MP camera system, and the inclusion of a 33W charger. Conversely, the device is limited by mid-range performance that can stutter under heavy use, lack of a telephoto lens, and a shorter three-year software support policy.
The Phonandroid review positions the Motorola Razr 50 as a refined, budget-friendly foldable featuring a massive, functional 3.63-inch external display and a durable, gapless design with a vegan leather finish. Key improvements include IPX8 water resistance and a high-quality 120Hz internal screen, making it a stylish yet practical, mid-range contender. While powered by the efficient MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chip, which delivers excellent battery life, the device experiences occasional performance stutters during heavy multitasking or with demanding apps. The 50MP main camera produces mixed results, often suffering from inconsistent low-light performance and slow shutter speeds. Overall, the Razr 50 is recommended for those seeking a premium foldable experience without the high cost, provided they accept compromises in raw gaming power and camera speed.
The Tom’s Guide France review highlights the Motorola Razr 50 as a successful, affordable entry into the foldable market at €899, featuring a significantly improved 3.6-inch external display. Pros include a durable design with IPX8 water resistance, a comfortable vegan leather finish, and a bright 6.9-inch pOLED internal screen. While the 4,200mAh battery offers solid daily endurance, the device is held back by mid-range MediaTek Dimensity 7300X performance and mediocre 13MP ultra-wide camera quality.
The Frandroid review identifies the Motorola Razr 50 as a major upgrade for affordable foldables, highlighted by a large 3.63-inch external screen with 90Hz refresh rate and a refined design, all for 899 euros. Key advantages include excellent battery life from the 4200 mAh cell, a bright 3000-nit inner display with a minimal crease, and IPX8 water resistance. However, compromises exist, specifically regarding the mid-range MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chip which faces performance limitations, average camera performance, and slow 30W charging. DismissMore input optionsMicrophoneStopStartSendAsk about
The Motorola Razr (2024), also referred to as the Razr 50, features a significantly improved 3.6-inch external display that allows for full app functionality, paired with a premium design featuring vegan leather and a minimal crease. The device includes a 6.9-inch 120Hz LTPO OLED main screen with 3,000 nits peak brightness and boasts enhanced durability with an IPX8 water resistance rating. Key pros include this large cover screen, excellent battery life that outlasts many competitors, and a refined build. Under the hood, the smartphone utilizes a MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chipset, which, while efficient for daily tasks, falls short in raw power compared to high-end alternatives, leading to potential performance lags during heavy gaming. The camera system includes a 50MP main sensor that provides decent results but struggles with low-light performance and shutter speed. Additionally, charging speeds are relatively limited at 30W wired and 15W wireless.
The Motorola Razr 60 (also referred to as the 2024 model) is positioned as a competitive, stylish, and more affordable foldable smartphone, featuring a durable vegan leather design and a functional 3.6-inch external pOLED display for app usage. It boasts a high-quality 6.9-inch internal 120Hz screen, strong battery life that surpasses many rivals, and improved IP48 water resistance. Performance is driven by the capable MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, offering smooth daily operation, although it is not optimized for intensive, high-end gaming. The 50MP main camera produces good results, but the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens limits zoom capabilities, and the 13MP ultrawide can produce inconsistent colors. While the Hello UI provides a clean user experience, the device is limited to three years of OS updates, which falls short of competitor standards. Despite minor complaints regarding the visible internal crease and lack of a charger, the device offers excellent value for a mid-range foldable.
The L’Éclaireur Fnac Lab review of the Motorola Razr 50 highlights its attractive, well-built design featuring a functional, large external display and a nearly invisible crease. However, the device is criticized for mediocre performance from the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chipset, particularly in gaming, and underwhelming, short-lived battery life. Additionally, the internal screen suffers from poor color accuracy, and the 50MP camera system is deemed disappointing, making this affordable foldable a mixed proposition. L'Éclaireur Fnac
The Journal du Geek review positions the Motorola Razr 50 as a premium-feeling, mid-range flip phone, highlighting its vastly improved 3.63-inch pOLED external display and robust hinge design with IPX8 water resistance. Key strengths include a vibrant 6.9-inch internal LTPO AMOLED screen, strong all-day battery life from the 4,200 mAh cell, and the addition of 15W wireless charging. However, the device features a mid-range MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chip, which can stutter under heavy load, and a 13MP ultra-wide camera that lacks detail in low light.
The 2025 Motorola Razr Ultra and standard Razr 2025 are recognized as leading foldable phones, with the $1,300 Ultra featuring a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip and premium finishes, while the $700 standard model utilizes a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. Key advantages across both models include highly functional, large external displays, reduced screen creases, and robust IP48 water and dust resistance. However, the devices face criticism for limited three-year software support, difficulty in one-handed opening, and specific camera shortcomings, such as grainy low-light video on the standard model.
The Bitwares review highlights the Motorola Razr 60 as a significant mid-range foldable improvement, boasting a robust design with a titanium-reinforced hinge, an IP48 dust and water resistance rating, and a 3,000-nit, 6.9-inch pOLED screen. Key advantages include a functional 3.6-inch external display, a high-end aesthetic with vegan leather, and improved 4,500mAh battery life, though the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X processor may struggle with heavy gaming or intense multitasking. While the 50MP camera system offers solid daylight performance, the device lacks a telephoto lens and exhibits inconsistent low-light results, balancing its competent performance with minor photographic limitations.
The Motorola Razr 50 elevates the affordable foldable market by introducing a vastly improved 3.6-inch 90Hz external display capable of running almost any application. The device features a premium design with a 6.9-inch 120Hz internal screen boasting 3,000 nits peak brightness, paired with IPX8 water resistance and a durable vegan leather finish. Performance is driven by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, providing capable daily performance, while a 4,200mAh battery ensures solid longevity alongside 30W wired and 15W wireless charging. However, the experience is not without compromises, notably in the camera department, where the 50MP sensor, while good in daylight, suffers from lag, slow shutter speeds, and reduced quality in low-light conditions. Performance-heavy tasks can lead to inconsistent heat management, and the speakers are described as thin.
The Motorola Razr 50 review from SmartWorld highlights the device as a high-quality "affordable" foldable, featuring a solid steel hinge, premium build, and an IPX8 water-resistant design. Pros include a 6.9-inch 3,000-nit AMOLED display with a near-invisible crease and a highly functional 3.6-inch external screen that supports full app usage. However, the device features a mid-range MediaTek Dimensity 7300X processor and slower UFS 2.2 storage, resulting in potential performance bottlenecks compared to higher-end models. Other cons mentioned include the use of a virtual proximity sensor and a limited USB-C 2.0 port. Despite these, the camera system provides solid performance for the price, paired with reliable all-day battery life featuring 30W wired and 15W wireless charging. SmartWorld
The Motorola Razr 50 delivers a premium design with a high-quality vegan leather finish and a large, functional 3.63-inch external display, mirroring the aesthetics of the more expensive Ultra model. Performance is driven by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, which is adequate for daily tasks but can experience occasional, minor lag during heavy multitasking. Key pros include a robust 4,200mAh battery for long-lasting performance and IPX8 water resistance, while cons include a slow-firing camera that struggles in low light and the lack of a charger in the box.
The Motorola Razr 50 is a well-balanced, affordable foldable featuring a large 3.63-inch external display that allows for full app usage without opening the device. Key pros highlighted include the high-quality, bright screens and a solid build, offering a premium experience below top-tier pricing. Conversely, cons include occasional performance lags under heavy workloads and relatively slow 30W charging compared to competitors. The device offers a full day of battery life but has a shorter software update cycle.
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is described by ITDaily as a mature business flagship, featuring a robust, improved hinge, IP48 water/dust resistance, and a highly functional 4-inch, 165Hz cover screen. Pros include the refined design and expansive external display, though the vegan leather back is noted to attract dust easily. Performance is top-tier with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, yet the device suffers from noticeable heat generation under heavy use. While the 4,700 mAh battery generally lasts a day, it faces limitations under pressure, and the 68W charging speed sometimes falls short of competitors. The dual 50MP camera system offers a useful "camcorder mode" but lacks a dedicated optical zoom and sometimes produces over-saturated colors. A major drawback noted is the limited four-year security update policy, considered inadequate for its premium €1,299 price tag.
According to Android Planet, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a refined foldable featuring a 4-inch, highly functional external display that supports full app usage and a vibrant 165Hz internal screen. Powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 with 12GB of RAM, the device delivers high-end performance, complemented by improved durability with an IPX8 water resistance rating. Key advantages include its stylish design and superior cover screen, though the camera setup trades the ultra-wide lens for a 2x telephoto, and software support remains shorter than competitors.
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (reviewed as the Razr 60 Ultra) is highlighted for its high "fun factor," driven by a massive 4-inch 165Hz external display reaching 2,400 nits, which allows for full app usage. The device features a nearly invisible crease on the internal 6.9-inch screen and improved IPX8 water resistance, powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and 12GB of RAM. Camera, performance, and screen quality are major pros, notes. However, the camera setup lacks an ultrawide lens, replacing it with a 50MP 2x telephoto, which may not suit all users. The 4000mAh battery often requires daily charging, and the device can get warm under intensive use. Additionally, the three-year software update policy lags behind competitors.
Compare
