OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:6.9 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB)
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 84% of smartphones
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

â–²Better than 83%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

25%

8.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

9.1

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

â–²Better than 84%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 76%
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
  • motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
motorola-razr-50-ultra-8gb-512gb
Best prices
    N/A~ £480
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
12GB + 512GBCheck price
Other versions:
8GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components:

25%

8.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

9.1

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

7.9
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Popularity:
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 7.6 points, which is higher than 70.5% of smartphones.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

7.9
Brand name
Motorola
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor which is faster than processors in 89% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.7% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 75.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.0
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.0 which is wider than that of 81.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 32 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 42.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.9 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.9 inches which is larger than the screens of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2640 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2640 px which is higher than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
413 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 413 ppi which is higher than that of 70.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
165 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 165 Hz which is higher than in 98.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 1.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 90.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 6.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
171.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171.4 mm which is taller than 89.9% of smartphones.
Width
74 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74 mm which is narrower than 82.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.1 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.1 mm which is thinner than 96.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
189 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 189 g which is lighter than 68% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
88,578 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 88,578 cm³ which is smaller than 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2.08x lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (12.5 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    12.5 W vs 6 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 91.7% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1265 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,265 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 8% better value for money
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.92 vs 7.3).
    7.92 vs 7.34
  • 39.6% more popular
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.59 vs 5.4).
    7.59 vs 5.44
  • 2.08x lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (12.5 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    12.5 W vs 6 W
  • 2x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 95.9% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,845 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,845 vs 942
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 25% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (64 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    64 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3 GHz & 4x2.8 GHz & 3x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3 GHz & 4x2.8 GHz & 3x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 74.5% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (4800 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    4,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 15.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1100 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,100 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 2x more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8192 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    8,192 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Supports newer OpenGL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenGL version than the average smartphone (3.3 vs 3.2). The average version is 3.2.
    3.3 vs 3.2
  • 3x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (768 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    768 vs 256
  • 61.3% higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (981 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    981 vs 608
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, Magic Canvas, Style Sync, Catch Me Up, Remember This, Pay Attention
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • 2,000 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (3000 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 91.7% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1265 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,265 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.23 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.9 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 37.5% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (5000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    5,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 371.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1265 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,265 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 4.6% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (413 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    413 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1.2 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Is designed for seniors
    This smartphone is designed specifically for seniors, the average smartphone is not. 17% of smartphones are senior-friendly.
  • 2 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74 mm vs 76 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 3.7% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (189 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    189 g vs 196.2 g
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 7.8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.4 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China
  • 84.6% more expensive
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£480 vs £260).
    £480 vs £260
  • 84.6% more expensive
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£480 vs £260).
    £480 vs £260
  • 2.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
    the average smartphone
    Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.79 vs 8.000).
    7.79 vs 8
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 7.8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.4 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    United States vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techguide.com.au
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review - same same but different and better!
E
eftm.com
30/07/2024
Summary of the review
Review: Motorola razr 50 Ultra — once again the best flip phone of the year?
G
galaxus.at
28/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review | a new hope for foldables
G
gsmarena.com
25/06/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra/razr+ (2024) review
D
digitalreviews.net
28/08/2024
Summary of the review
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra cuts the mustard
G
geardiary.com
09/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: The Razr+ 2024 Proves That Mighty Things Can Come in Small Packages
T
techradar.com
12/11/2024
Summary of the review
Hands on: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review
C
cybershack.com.au
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra – raises the flip smartphone bar yet again
D
digitalcameraworld.com
22/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: a flip in the right direction
S
stuff.tv
10/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra review: the 2024 flip phone to beat
T
trustedreviews.com
12/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review
D
digitec.ch
28/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: A Blazing Improvement Brings Hope
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
05/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: A great evolution of the foldable smartphone
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
02/09/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lab Test: The foldable still has a way to go
(Translated)Show original
P
presse-citron.net
24/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: Can it make Samsung flip?
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
25/06/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola RAZR 50 Ultra Review: This is it!
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
25/06/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: Significantly improved, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip rival hits the mark
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
08/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: How does the Galaxy Z Flip 6's biggest rival stack up?
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
09/07/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: The foldable smartphone gets serious
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Review: Better Than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip?",
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB)

  • Large, vibrant, and highly functional external (cover) display that supports full apps, reducing the need to open the phone frequently.
  • Stylish and premium-feeling design with a variety of back material options (vegan leather, Alcantara, etc.).
  • Durable build quality featuring a titanium-reinforced hinge and an IP48 water/dust resistance rating, considered among the best for a flip phone.
  • Minimal and barely noticeable crease on the internal display.
  • Strong performance for daily tasks and gaming, powered by the high-end Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor.
  • Excellent battery life that often lasts a full day or more with typical use, outperforming some rivals.
  • Fast 68W wired and 30W wireless charging support.
  • Clean and intuitive software experience (Hello UI) with useful gestures like the 'double-twist' to open the camera.
  • Ability to use the superior main cameras for high-quality selfies via the cover screen.
  • Good call quality and clear stereo speakers.

What we don't like about Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB)

  • Camera performance, while decent, is not considered high-end for its price and struggles in low-light or with motion blur.
  • Phone can get warm, or even overheat and shut down during extended heavy use like gaming or benchmarking.
  • Limited software support pledge of only three years of OS upgrades and four years of security updates, falling short of competitors like Samsung.
  • Lacks an ultra-wide camera lens, opting for a 2x telephoto instead, which some users find less versatile.
  • Still uses the older, slower USB 2.0 standard for its USB-C port, a significant drawback for data transfer speeds.
  • Some apps are not perfectly optimized for the external display and may require resizing.
  • The internal screen, while bright, may not get as bright in direct sunlight as standard (non-folding) OLED displays.
  • Mixed user reviews regarding long-term durability, with some reports of inner displays breaking.

Verdict

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a premium flip smartphone featuring a powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform, 8GB of RAM, and 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage. Its main pros include two vibrant 165Hz pOLED displays (a large 4.0" external screen and a 6.9" internal foldable screen with a nearly invisible crease), an excellent 50MP main camera system with a 2x telephoto lens and OIS, IPX8 water resistance, and a clean, feature-rich Hello UI. Key cons are the phone's tendency to heat up and thermal throttle under intensive use (meaning the performance might not live up to the "Ultra" name and chipset on paper), a merely adequate 4000mAh battery that may struggle with heavy use, and Motorola's somewhat slow software update track record.

Compare Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (8GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found