OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Routers Methodology v3.0
Routers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Routers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Routers Methodology v3.0

Linksys EA6400 review: 77 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi speed:1300 MbpsLAN port speeds:1 GbpsMesh Wi-Fi:no

Linksys EA6400 Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

Linksys EA6400
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

40%

6.6

Technical score

25%

6.6

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 82% of routers
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 88%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

26%

5.2

Wireless

20%

5.8

Ports

18%

8.5

Networking

14%

7.3

Security

12%

6.2

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

â–¼Worse than 71%
6.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.6

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.1 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

8.5

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
  • linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
linksys-ea6400
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Linksys EA6400

Based on 5 · 3

Reviewers praise the interface, easy setup and design, but Wi-Fi speed disappoints.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of router Linksys EA6400

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

26%

5.2

Wireless

20%

5.8

Ports

18%

8.5

Networking

14%

7.3

Security

12%

6.2

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

6.6
Reviews score
6.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.7
Brand name
Linksys
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), which is more advanced than 35.2% of routers and equal to 23.1% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.2% of routers and equal to 65.6% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
1,300 Mbps
Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
This router delivers 1,300 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is lower than 53.9% of routers and equal to 1% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz channel width options, which is more than 36.5% of routers and the same as 29.9% of routers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA/WPA2, WEP
This router supports WPA/WPA2, WEP Wi-Fi security protocols, which are less advanced than 96.5% of routers and equal to 1.6% of routers.
DoS protection
no
This router does not include DoS protection. 90.4% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 4.7% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
This router supports MAC address filtering. 1.7% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
This router supports URL filtering. 2.6% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
This router supports IPv6. 8.8% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
This router does not support dynamic routing. 46.2% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
no
This router does not support inter-VLAN routing. 24.5% of routers support inter-VLAN routing.
VLAN tagging
yes
This router supports VLAN tagging. 33.6% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
yes
This router includes QoS controls. 2.4% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
4
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 4 LAN ports, which is more than 34.2% of routers and the same as 59.3% of routers.
LAN port speeds
1 Gbps
This router offers 1 Gbps on its LAN ports, which is faster than 25.7% of routers and on par with 56.1% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 0.8% of routers and the same as 89.4% of routers.
N. of USB ports
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 USB ports, which is more than 40.1% of routers and the same as 41.5% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 1.7% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
What reviewers say
Management interface
Web UI, App
This router uses Web UI, App for management, which is more advanced than 29.7% of routers and equal to 60.9% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, Automatic
This router supports Web UI, Automatic firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 30.2% of routers and equal to 31.9% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
yes
This router includes traffic monitoring. 13.9% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 7.3% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
This router does not offer captive portal features. 22.4% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU clock speed
1x 0.8 GHz
This router runs at 1x0.8 GHz, which is slower than 62.9% of routers and on par with 0.3% of routers.
RAM capacity
128 MB
Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
This router has 128 MB of RAM, which is less than 54% of routers and the same as 16.3% of routers.
Internal storage
0.125 GB
Market range: <0.0039 GB – >0.5 GB
This router has 0.125 GB of internal storage, which is more than 47.9% of routers and the same as 23.8% of routers.
Hardware acceleration
yes
This router offers hardware acceleration. 24.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
0
Market range: <0 – >10
This router has 0 external antennas, which is fewer than 62.7% of routers and the same as 37.3% of routers.
Show more
What reviewers say

Linksys EA6400 vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • More capable NAS services
    This router includes SMB, FTP, media server, NFS NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, media server.
    SMB, FTP, media server, NFS vs SMB, media server
  • 5 more internal antennas
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (5 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    5 vs 0
  • 1.9 W lower power consumption
    This router uses less power than the average router (6.2 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    6.2 W vs 8.1 W
  • Includes memory card slot
    This router has a memory card slot, while the average router does not. 7.7% of routers have a memory card slot.
  • Includes memory card slot
    This router has a memory card slot, while the average router does not. 7.7% of routers have a memory card slot.
  • More capable NAS services
    This router includes SMB, FTP, media server, NFS NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, media server.
    SMB, FTP, media server, NFS vs SMB, media server
  • 5 more internal antennas
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (5 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    5 vs 0
  • 1.9 W lower power consumption
    This router uses less power than the average router (6.2 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    6.2 W vs 8.1 W
  • No VPN server support
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 68.8% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • Limited firmware updates
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • No MU-MIMO
    This router does not support MU-MIMO, while the average router does. 54% of routers support MU-MIMO.
  • No DoS protection
    This router does not support DoS protection, while the average router does. 90.2% of routers support DoS protection.
  • 14.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.6

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.1 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.7
  • 25.3% narrower wireless coverage
    This router has narrower wireless coverage than the average router (139 m² vs 186 m²). The average router offers wireless coverage of 186 m².
    139 m² vs 186 m²
  • No band steering
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 57.6% of routers support band steering.
  • Lower CPU clock speed
    This router has a lower CPU clock speed than the average router (1x0.8 GHz vs 2x1 GHz). The average router has a CPU clock speed of 2x1 GHz.
    1x0.8 GHz vs 2x1 GHz
  • 14.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.6

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.1 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.7
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Linksys EA6400 has worse value for money than the average router (7.72 vs 8.1).
    7.72 vs 8.08
  • 47.4% more expensive
    Linksys EA6400 is more expensive than the average router (£140 vs £95).
    £140 vs £95
  • No MU-MIMO
    This router does not support MU-MIMO, while the average router does. 54% of routers support MU-MIMO.
  • 25.3% narrower wireless coverage
    This router has narrower wireless coverage than the average router (139 m² vs 186 m²). The average router offers wireless coverage of 186 m².
    139 m² vs 186 m²
  • No band steering
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 57.6% of routers support band steering.
  • 25.7% slower Wi-Fi speed
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (1,300 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1,750 Mbps.
    1,300 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps
  • No VPN server support
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 68.8% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • No DoS protection
    This router does not support DoS protection, while the average router does. 90.2% of routers support DoS protection.
  • No PPTP server
    This router cannot act as a PPTP server, while the average router can. 66.2% of routers can act as a PPTP server.
  • Weaker Wi-Fi security
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA/WPA2, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP.
    WPA/WPA2, WEP vs WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP
  • No DNS relay
    This router does not support DNS relay, while the average router does. 94% of routers support DNS relay.
  • Limited firmware updates
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Lower CPU clock speed
    This router has a lower CPU clock speed than the average router (1x0.8 GHz vs 2x1 GHz). The average router has a CPU clock speed of 2x1 GHz.
    1x0.8 GHz vs 2x1 GHz
  • 2 fewer external antennas
    This router has fewer external antennas than the average router (0 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    0 vs 2
  • 50% less RAM
    This router has less RAM than the average router (128 MB vs 256 MB). The average router has 256 MB of RAM.
    128 MB vs 256 MB
  • 6 years older release date
    This router is an older model than the average router (2013 vs 2019). The average router release year is 2019.
    May 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 63 mm wider width
    This router is wider than the average router (256 mm vs 193 mm). The average router is 193 mm wide.
    256 mm vs 193 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Tech for PC & Mac
≈ estimated
05/11/2015
Unboxing · first look at design and setup
Verdict
Linksys EA6400 is off to a good start, with a clean, nicely finished design and quick NFC setup, though performance is still untested.
6.0
Reviews089
≈ estimated
14/07/2013
Short review · first look and speed test
Verdict
Linksys EA6400 looks stylish and works well, but below-average speed for the price makes it only an okay deal.
6.0
CNET
≈ estimated
11/07/2013
First look · short speed test and impressions
Verdict
Linksys EA6400 is an acceptable deal: it works well and looks good, but speeds lag similar routers and the price is high.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
19/06/2013
Lab test · Mid-range Wi-Fi router
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is a fine, easy-to-set-up router with a sharp interface, but it is slower on 5GHz than last year's EA6500.
7.3
cnet.com
✓ explicit
12/07/2013
Lab test · Wi-Fi performance
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is an easy-to-use router with a solid interface and clean design, but its range and speeds trail other 802.11ac routers.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
30/04/2014
Lab test · Mid-range router
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is a stylish, easy-to-set-up router that performs very well up close, though its speeds drop off with distance.
9.0
thetechpirate.net
≈ estimated
16/03/2017
Personal review · Home network router
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is a solid performer that sets up quickly and suits an average home, though it won't break speed records.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
19/06/2013
Hands-on test · Everyday home router
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is easy to set up, with a clear interface and USB drive sharing, but it's slightly slower on 5 GHz than the EA6500.
8.0
journalmetro.com
≈ estimated
26/06/2013
Hands-on test · Smart router
Verdict
The Linksys EA6400 is a powerful high-end router with a clear interface and a USB 3.0 port for sharing, but its smart apps are limited.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Linksys EA6400

  • Very simple setup and an intuitive Smart Wi-Fi interface.
  • Convenient remote management options through web and app tools.
  • Elegant and compact design that can also be wall-mounted.
  • Stable Wi-Fi signal for routine household usage.
  • Includes USB 3.0 for basic file or printer sharing.
  • Performs reasonably well at short to medium range.

What customers don't like about Linksys EA6400

  • Wireless performance is often only average for an AC router in this class.
  • Signal range is limited in larger homes or through many obstacles.
  • 5GHz throughput trails some competing models.
  • There are no front status LEDs for quick connection checks.
  • The hardware is dated and no longer close to current Wi-Fi standards.
  • USB/NAS performance is limited for heavier storage tasks.

Verdict

The Linksys EA6400 is an AC1600 dual-band Smart Wi-Fi router featuring 802.11ac technology with theoretical speeds up to 300 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band and 1300 Mbps on the 5 GHz band. It is equipped with four Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports, one Gigabit WAN port, and a USB 3.0 port for network-attached storage or printer sharing. Key advantages include its user-friendly cloud-enabled setup, stable Wi-Fi signal, and integrated Media Prioritization for streaming and gaming. However, it often suffers from a shorter effective wireless range compared to competitors and underwhelming data transfer rates at longer distances.

Compare Linksys EA6400 with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Linksys EA6400 and other routers

No results found