OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Edimax BR 6228NC Review | 77 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi speed:150 MbpsLAN port speeds:100 MbpsMesh Wi-Fi:no

Edimax BR 6228NC Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the router's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best routers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical Score

10%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 90% of routers
5.9

Technical Score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

26%

4.6

Wireless

20%

5.1

Ports

18%

6.7

Networking

14%

8.5

Security

12%

5.8

Hardware

10%

6.2

Management

â–¼Worse than 90% of routers
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User reviews

30%

5.7

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(94)
amazon
3.4
(10)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
3.8
(104)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

â–¼Worse than 91% of routers
  • edimax-br-6228nc
  • edimax-br-6228nc
  • edimax-br-6228nc
  • edimax-br-6228nc
  • edimax-br-6228nc
  • edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc
edimax-br-6228nc

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Edimax BR-6228nC is an N150 wireless broadband router that provides data transmission speeds up to 150Mbps and features a 10/100Mbps WAN port alongside four Fast Ethernet LAN ports. This versatile device supports multiple operational modes including Access Point, Bridge, and WISP, while utilizing Green Technology to save up to 74% of power consumption by adjusting signal strength based on active data transmission. Key pros include a high-gain 3dBi detachable antenna for flexible coverage, a built-in WPS button for easy security setup, and broad support for security protocols like WEP, WPA, and WPA2. However, its main cons are its limited single-band 2.4GHz frequency and 150Mbps maximum speed, which may struggle with modern high-bandwidth tasks like 4K streaming compared to newer dual-band standards.

Technical Specifications of router Edimax BR 6228NC

Technical Score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

26%

4.6

Wireless

20%

5.1

Ports

18%

6.7

Networking

14%

8.5

Security

12%

5.8

Hardware

10%

6.2

Management

5.9
Edimax BR 6228NC has a technical score of 5.9 points, which is lower than that of 89.7% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User reviews

30%

5.7

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(94)
amazon
3.4
(10)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
3.8
(104)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

7.0
Edimax BR 6228NC has a user score of 6.97 points, which is lower than that of 90.7% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a router reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Popularity:
Edimax BR 6228NC has a popularity score of 5.7 points, which is lower than that of 58.1% of products in this category.
5.7
Edimax BR 6228NC has a popularity score of 5.7 points, which is lower than that of 58.1% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Edimax BR 6228NC has a value-for-money score of 7.2 points, which is lower than that of 86.8% of products in this category.
Brand name
Edimax
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), which is less advanced than 60.8% of routers and equal to 37.3% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
This router supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are less versatile than 75.4% of routers and equal to 22.4% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
150 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
150 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
This router delivers 150 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is lower than 91.5% of routers and equal to 7% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz channel width options, which is fewer than 59.3% of routers and the same as 35.1% of routers.
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP
â–² Better than 41% of models
This router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP Wi-Fi security protocols, which are more advanced than 40.9% of routers and equal to 17.7% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
DoS protection
yes
â–² Better than 13% of models
This router includes DoS protection. 12.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
SPI intrusion protection
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 6.1% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
MAC address filtering
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This router supports MAC address filtering. 2.2% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
URL filter
yes
â–² Better than 3% of models
This router supports URL filtering. 3.4% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
no
IPv6 support
no
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
This router does not support IPv6. 88.7% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
Dynamic routing
no
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
This router does not support dynamic routing. 52.5% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
no
Inter-VLAN routing
no
â–¼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not support inter-VLAN routing. 23.5% of routers support inter-VLAN routing.
VLAN tagging
no
VLAN tagging
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This router does not support VLAN tagging. 62% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
yes
QoS
yes
â–² Better than 3% of models
This router includes QoS controls. 3.2% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
4
N. of LAN ports
4
â–² Better than 24% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 4 LAN ports, which is more than 23.7% of routers and the same as 69.2% of routers.
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
This router offers 100 Mbps on its LAN ports, which is slower than 73.2% of routers and on par with 26.4% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
N. of WAN ports
1
â–¼ Worse than 9% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 1% of routers and the same as 90.1% of routers.
N. of USB ports
0
N. of USB ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 0 USB ports, which is fewer than 60.8% of routers and the same as 39.2% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Category Benchmark
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 0.5% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
Web UI
Management interface
Web UI
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This router uses Web UI for management, which is less advanced than 72.2% of routers and equal to 27.3% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This router supports Web UI firmware update methods, which are less convenient than 69.5% of routers and equal to 29.7% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
yes
Traffic monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This router includes traffic monitoring. 18.1% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 8.6% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
Captive portal
no
â–¼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not offer captive portal features. 23.5% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
?
RAM capacity
16 MB
RAM capacity
16 MB
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
This router has 16 MB of RAM, which is less than 95.7% of routers and the same as 3.4% of routers.
Internal storage
4 GB
Internal storage
4 GB
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
This router has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 90.4% of routers and the same as 9.3% of routers.
Hardware acceleration
no
Hardware acceleration
no
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
This router does not offer hardware acceleration. 68.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
1
N. of external antennas
1
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This router has 1 external antennas, which is fewer than 55.2% of routers and the same as 4.2% of routers.
Show more

Edimax BR 6228NC vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • 32x more internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
    This router has more internal storage than the average router (4 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • 6.6 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    1.5 W
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (1.5 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    1.5 W vs 8.1 W
  • Wider temperature range
    Operating temperature range
    0 to 45 C
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This router is rated for 0 to 45 C, while the average router is rated for 0 to 40 C.
    0 to 45 C vs 0 to 40 C
  • 189 more connected devices
    Maximum connected devices
    253
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >250
    This router supports more connected devices than the average router (253 vs 64). The average router supports 64 connected devices.
    253 vs 64
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    Wi-Fi security protocols
    WPA2, WPA, WEP
    â–² Better than 41% of models
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS.
    WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
  • Removable antennas
    Removable antennas
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This router has removable antennas, while the average router does not. 27.4% of routers have removable antennas.
  • 4.5x cheaper
    Edimax BR 6228NC is cheaper than the average router (£20 vs £90).
    £20 vs £90
  • 63% lighter weight
    Weight
    163 g
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <200 g – >1.2k g
    This router is lighter than the average router (163 g vs 440 g). The average router weighs 440 g.
    163 g vs 440 g
  • 4.5x cheaper
    Edimax BR 6228NC is cheaper than the average router (£20 vs £90).
    £20 vs £90
  • 189 more connected devices
    Maximum connected devices
    253
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >250
    This router supports more connected devices than the average router (253 vs 64). The average router supports 64 connected devices.
    253 vs 64
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    Wi-Fi security protocols
    WPA2, WPA, WEP
    â–² Better than 41% of models
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS.
    WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
  • 32x more internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
    This router has more internal storage than the average router (4 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • 6.6 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    1.5 W
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (1.5 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    1.5 W vs 8.1 W
  • Wider temperature range
    Operating temperature range
    0 to 45 C
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This router is rated for 0 to 45 C, while the average router is rated for 0 to 40 C.
    0 to 45 C vs 0 to 40 C
  • Removable antennas
    Removable antennas
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This router has removable antennas, while the average router does not. 27.4% of routers have removable antennas.
  • 63% lighter weight
    Weight
    163 g
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <200 g – >1.2k g
    This router is lighter than the average router (163 g vs 440 g). The average router weighs 440 g.
    163 g vs 440 g
  • 19 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    26 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <28 mm – >98 mm
    This router is thinner than the average router (26 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    26 mm vs 45 mm
  • 21.5 mm lower height
    Height
    26 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <30 mm – >180 mm
    This router is shorter than the average router (26 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    26 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This router supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average router (2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz). The average router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
  • No IPv6 support
    IPv6 support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This router does not support IPv6, while the average router does. 88.5% of routers support IPv6.
  • 89.8% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    150 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (150 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    150 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • 8.2% worse value for money
    Edimax BR 6228NC has worse value for money than the average router (7.23 vs 7.8).
    7.23 vs 7.82
  • 14.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Edimax BR 6228NC
    the average router
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Edimax BR 6228NC has a lower user score than the average router (6.97 vs 8.000).
    6.97 vs 8
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This router supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average router (2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz). The average router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
  • 89.8% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    150 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (150 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    150 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • Narrower channel widths
    Channel widths supported
    20 MHz + 40 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This router has a lower supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • 2 fewer spatial streams
    N. of spatial streams
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (1 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    1 vs 3
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 51.8% of routers support band steering.
  • No beamforming
    Beamforming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This router does not support beamforming, while the average router does. 56.7% of routers support beamforming.
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • No PPTP server
    PPTP server
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This router cannot act as a PPTP server, while the average router can. 62.4% of routers can act as a PPTP server.
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No IPv6 support
    IPv6 support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This router does not support IPv6, while the average router does. 88.5% of routers support IPv6.
  • No dynamic routing
    Dynamic routing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This router does not support dynamic routing, while the average router does. 52.3% of routers support dynamic routing.
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • 1 fewer USB ports
    N. of USB ports
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This router has fewer USB ports than the average router (0 vs 1). The average router has 1 USB ports.
    0 vs 1
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This router includes none NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    none vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • Weaker management tools
    Management interface
    Web UI
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This router uses the management interface Web UI, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    Web UI vs Web UI, App
  • No DLNA support
    DLNA support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This router does not support DLNA, while the average router does. 54% of routers support DLNA.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • 93.8% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    16 MB
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
    This router has less RAM than the average router (16 MB vs 256 MB). The average router has 256 MB of RAM.
    16 MB vs 256 MB
  • 1 fewer external antennas
    N. of external antennas
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has fewer external antennas than the average router (1 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    1 vs 2

Graphic comparison of Edimax BR 6228NC and other routers

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
94 Reviews
amazon
3.4
10 Reviews
United States
Amazon_logo.png
3.8
104 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about Edimax BR 6228NC?

  • Multifunctional 3-in-1 design (Router, Access Point, and Range Extender)
  • Easy setup process using the 'iQ Setup' wizard without requiring a CD
  • Good coverage for its class, especially the V2 model with its 9dBi high-gain antenna
  • Energy-efficient 'Green Technology' that reduces power consumption by up to 74%
  • Compact and space-saving physical design
  • Cost-effective and budget-friendly for home or small office use
  • Includes useful security features like DoS protection and guest network support

What customers dislike about Edimax BR 6228NC?

  • Limited maximum wireless speed (150 Mbps), which is slow by modern standards
  • Single-band 2.4GHz only (standard models), making it susceptible to interference
  • Reported occasional stability issues requiring periodic reboots during long-term use
  • Lacks advanced modern hardware like USB ports for file sharing
  • Firmware interface can feel outdated compared to newer competitors
  • Customer service and support can be difficult to reach if hardware issues arise

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Edimax BR 6228NC with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)