Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark RV750EU review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Max suction power:?Runtime:90 minDustbin capacity:500 mLMax threshold height:?

Shark RV750EU Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.4

Technical score

20%

8.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of robot vacuums
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

30%

5.9

Cleaning

23%

5.3

Navigation

18%

4.2

Mopping

12%

4.1

Battery

10%

7.8

Smart Features

7%

5.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 90%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark RV750EU

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

30%

5.9

Cleaning

23%

5.3

Navigation

18%

4.2

Mopping

12%

4.1

Battery

10%

7.8

Smart Features

7%

5.7

Design

5.4
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Shark RV750EU has a popularity index of 10, higher than that of 91.5% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 8.5% of robot vacuums.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.0
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
3
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushed
This robot vacuum uses a brushed motor, a type that is generally less efficient than those used by 97.5% of robot vacuums and also used by 2.5% of robot vacuums.
Power
22 W
Cleaning modes
?
Show more
Mopping capability
no
This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, although 79% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
none
This robot vacuum uses none for mopping. This system is less effective than those on 79.8% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 20.2% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
none
Mop pad material
none
Mop pressure
N/A
Show more
Primary navigation technology
?
Mapping capability
no
This robot vacuum does not map the floor, although 74.2% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity. 64.7% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,600 mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,600 mAh, which is lower than 59% of robot vacuums and equal to 26.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
90 min
This robot vacuum runs for 90 min per charge, which is shorter than 89.9% of robot vacuums and equal to 4.2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
no
This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, although 83.3% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
88.5 mm
Width
310 mm
Length
315 mm
Weight
3.8 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.8 kg, making it heavier than 62.5% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 2.7% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark RV750EU vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 100 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (500 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    500 mL vs 400 mL
  • 9.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark RV750EU
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark RV750EU has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.74 vs 8.000).
    8.74 vs 8
  • 53.2% more popular
    Shark RV750EU is more popular than the average robot vacuum (10 vs 6.5).
    10 vs 6.53
  • 9.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark RV750EU
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark RV750EU has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.74 vs 8.000).
    8.74 vs 8
  • 53.2% more popular
    Shark RV750EU is more popular than the average robot vacuum (10 vs 6.5).
    10 vs 6.53
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 100 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (500 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    500 mL vs 400 mL
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • 8.5% worse value for money
    Shark RV750EU has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (6.99 vs 7.6).
    6.99 vs 7.59
  • 60 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (90 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    90 min vs 150 min
  • Does not resume cleaning after charging
    This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, while the average robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging.
  • 600 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 0.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (5 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    5 h vs 4.5 h
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2020, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2020 vs 2023
  • 6.4% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (3.8 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.8 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 1.4 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (66.4 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    66.4 dB vs 65 dB
  • No maintenance notifications
    This robot vacuum does not provide maintenance notifications, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.8% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No Bluetooth
    This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity, while the average robot vacuum does. 64.6% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not recognize individual rooms
    This robot vacuum does not recognize individual rooms, while the average robot vacuum recognizes individual rooms.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not support zone cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support zone cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports zone cleaning.
  • Does not support room-by-room cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support room-by-room cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports room-by-room cleaning.
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 29 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (149 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    149 mm vs 178 mm
  • Less efficient motor type
    This robot vacuum uses a generally less efficient motor type than the average robot vacuum (brushed vs brushless).
    brushed vs brushless
  • Cannot mop floors
    This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, while the average robot vacuum can mop floors.
  • No water flow control
    This robot vacuum does not support water flow control, while the average robot vacuum does. 70% of robot vacuums support water flow control.
  • Less capable mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses none for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    none vs static pad

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

V
vacuum-cleaner-advisor.com
19/04/2018
Summary of the review
T
techhive.com
09/07/2018
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
16/07/2021
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
07/01/2022
Summary of the review
P
petmycarpet.com
28/11/2017
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
06/03/2018
Summary of the review
V
vacuum-cleaner-advisor.com
15/01/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark RV750EU

  • Gentle navigation that avoids bumping into or damaging furniture
  • Easy to use and intuitive mobile app with scheduling
  • Low profile allows it to clean under beds and low furniture
  • Good, consistent cleaning performance on hard floors and low-pile carpets
  • Includes magnetic BotBoundary strips to block off restricted areas
  • Works well with Alexa and Google Assistant

What customers don't like about Shark RV750EU

  • Random, non-mapping navigation can lead to missed spots or getting lost
  • Small dustbin fills up quickly and requires frequent emptying
  • Struggles with heavy pet hair, which can tangle in the brushes
  • Can struggle to find the docking station, especially from other rooms
  • Not suitable for deep, thick carpet cleaning

Verdict

The Shark RV750EU (ION Robot 750) is a bagless robotic vacuum measuring 12.6 inches in diameter and 2.6 inches in height, weighing 5.5 pounds, and featuring a 0.45-quart dustbin alongside a 2600 mAh lithium-ion battery that delivers a runtime of 60 to 90 minutes. Key characteristics and advantages include a tri-brush system with dual spinning side brushes and a self-cleaning brush roll, smart sensor navigation for obstacle avoidance, boundary strips for no-go zones, and seamless connectivity via the SharkClean app plus voice control support through Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant. However, its primary drawbacks are its unorganized and random navigation pattern that can miss spots or repeatedly clean the same area, a lack of advanced multi-room mapping, and inconsistent docking reliability as it occasionally struggles to locate its charging station.

Compare Shark RV750EU with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark RV750EU and other robot vacuums

No results found