OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Rowenta RR8225 review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£220Max suction power:2000 PaRuntime:150 minDustbin capacity:440 mLMax threshold height:15 mm

Rowenta RR8225 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Rowenta RR8225
5.5/10

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

80%

4.9

Technical score

20%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 92% of robot vacuums
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 92%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

30%

5.1

Cleaning

23%

4.2

Navigation

18%

3.9

Mopping

12%

4.2

Battery

10%

8.4

Smart Features

7%

5.6

Design

â–¼Worse than 97%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 67%
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
  • rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
rowenta-rr8225
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Robot Vacuums model ranking

Ranked #291 of 506 models in Robot Vacuums (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Rowenta RR8225

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

30%

5.1

Cleaning

23%

4.2

Navigation

18%

3.9

Mopping

12%

4.2

Battery

10%

8.4

Smart Features

7%

5.6

Design

4.9
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RR8225 has a popularity index of 8.4, higher than that of 71.5% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 2.6% of robot vacuums.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

6.7
Max suction power
2000 Pa
Market range: <1.6k Pa – >12k Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 2000 Pa, which is lower than 77.8% of robot vacuums and equal to 8.4% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 2 suction power levels, which is fewer than 86.1% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 5.9% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
3
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 3 cleaning modes, which is fewer than 62% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 27.7% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
no
This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, although 79% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
none
This robot vacuum uses none for mopping. This system is less effective than those on 79.8% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 20.2% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
semi-circular
Mop pad material
none
Mop pressure
N/A
Show more
Primary navigation technology
infrared
This robot vacuum uses infrared as its primary navigation system, which is less capable than the systems in 93.3% of robot vacuums and matched by 2.5% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
no
This robot vacuum does not map the floor, although 74.2% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
Rowenta Robots
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity. 64.7% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,600 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,600 mAh, which is lower than 59% of robot vacuums and equal to 26.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
150 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 150 min per charge, which is longer than 47.1% of robot vacuums and equal to 11.3% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
no
This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, although 83.3% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
80 mm
Width
315 mm
Length
315 mm
Weight
3.45 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.45 kg, making it lighter than 55.8% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 0.6% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Rowenta RR8225 vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 40 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (440 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    440 mL vs 400 mL
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 40 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (440 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    440 mL vs 400 mL
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    infrared vs LiDAR
  • 2 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    2 vs 4
  • 2,000 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • 5 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (15 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    15 mm vs 20 mm
  • 13.7% worse value for money
    Rowenta RR8225 has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (6.68 vs 7.6).
    6.68 vs 7.59
  • 1.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RR8225
    the average robot vacuum
    Rowenta RR8225 has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (7.85 vs 8).
    7.85 vs 8
  • Does not resume cleaning after charging
    This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, while the average robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging.
  • 1.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6 h vs 4.5 h
  • 600 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 30 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (150 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    150 m² vs 180 m²
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2021, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2021 vs 2023
  • 5 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (70 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    70 dB vs 65 dB
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No Bluetooth
    This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity, while the average robot vacuum does. 64.6% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
  • No do not disturb mode
    This robot vacuum does not have a do not disturb mode, while the average robot vacuum does. 89.3% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    infrared vs LiDAR
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • 5 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (15 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    15 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not recognize individual rooms
    This robot vacuum does not recognize individual rooms, while the average robot vacuum recognizes individual rooms.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not support virtual boundaries
    This robot vacuum does not support virtual boundaries, while the average robot vacuum supports virtual boundaries.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • No gyroscope
    This robot vacuum does not have a gyroscope, while the average robot vacuum does. 93.1% of robot vacuums have this sensor.
  • 2 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    2 vs 4
  • 2,000 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • 1 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not support zone cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support zone cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports zone cleaning.
  • Does not support room-by-room cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support room-by-room cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports room-by-room cleaning.
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • Cannot mop floors
    This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, while the average robot vacuum can mop floors.
  • No water flow control
    This robot vacuum does not support water flow control, while the average robot vacuum does. 70% of robot vacuums support water flow control.
  • Less capable mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses none for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    none vs static pad
  • 130 mL less onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (110 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    110 mL vs 240 mL
  • 3 fewer water flow levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer water flow levels than the average robot vacuum (0 vs 3). The average number of water flow levels is 3.
    0 vs 3

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
test-aankoop.be
N/A
Summary of the review
ROWENTA RR8225WH test en review - Testaankoop
T
test-achats.be
2022
Summary of the review
Rowenta RR8225WH: full review, price, specifications
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
01/10/2021
Summary of the review
ROWENTA RR8225WH: test, review, prices and specifications
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
Geen publicatiedatum beschikbaar
Summary of the review
Rowenta X-Plorer Serie 45 RR8225 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
12/11/2021
Summary of the review
Rowenta X-Plorer Serie 45 RR8225 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Rowenta RR8225

  • Good battery autonomy lasting up to 150 minutes on a single charge
  • Effective dual side brushes that help clean corners and hard-to-reach edges
  • Sufficient obstacle clearance climbing onto rugs and carpets up to 15mm high
  • Slim design which allows it to pass easily under low furniture items
  • Decent pickup performance of dust and hair on hard floors

What customers don't like about Rowenta RR8225

  • Unreliable smartphone application that frequently disconnects from the robot
  • Lack of proper smart mapping features since it relies on random infrared navigation
  • Difficulty navigating or getting stuck on loose cables and dark carpets
  • Small dustbin capacity that requires regular manual emptying
  • The vacuum can occasionally struggle to find its way back to the charging dock

Verdict

The Rowenta X-Plorer Serie 45 RR8225 is a bagless, round robot vacuum designed for hard floors and carpets, measuring 31.5 cm in diameter and 8.0 cm in height with a weight of 3.45 kg. Key characteristics include a 0.44-liter dust capacity, a 3-step cleaning system featuring a motorized central turbo brush and two side brushes, 15 mm threshold climbing ability, and three navigation modes (Auto, Auto Express, and Wall-Follow) powered by infrared collision and fall sensors. Main pros consist of a long-lasting Lithium-Ion battery providing up to 150 minutes of runtime (covering up to 150 m²), automatic docking, and smart control via the Rowenta Robots app with Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant voice compatibility. Notable cons include its reliance on basic infrared sensor navigation rather than advanced laser mapping, a relatively high noise level of 70 dB, and the lack of an integrated mopping system or self-emptying base station.

Compare Rowenta RR8225 with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RR8225 and other robot vacuums

No results found