Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Intel Core i7 1360P Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£420PassMark benchmark result:18481N. of physical cores:12CPU boost clock speed:5.0 GHzCPU socket:FCBGA1744TDP (Thermal design power):28 W

Intel Core i7 1360P Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 80% of processors
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

7.6

Performance

18%

7.5

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.6

Power & Thermal

4%

8.4

Platform

1%

8.0

Integrated Graphics

▲Better than 81% of processors
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
  • intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p
intel-core-i7-1360p

Best prices

    N/A~ £420

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 1360P

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.6

Performance

18%

7.5

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.6

Power & Thermal

4%

8.4

Platform

1%

8.0

Integrated Graphics

7.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel Core i7 1360P has a popularity score of 1 point, which is higher than that of 0% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.6

Overall score

40%

8.3

Price

7.8
Brand name
Intel
Processor type
mobile
Processor type
mobile
This processor belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
CPU socket
FCBGA1744
CPU socket
FCBGA1744
This processor uses the FCBGA1744 CPU socket, which is older than that of 71.8% of processors and equal to that of 5% of processors.
Chipset
N/A
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
12
N. of physical cores
12
This processor has 12 CPU cores, which is more than 81.5% of processors and equal to 5.5% of processors.
CPU threads
16
CPU threads
16
This processor offers 16 CPU threads, which is more than 71% of processors and equal to 14% of processors.
Threads per core
?
CPU boost clock speed
5 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
5 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 5 GHz which is higher than that of 80.3% of processors and equal to that of 5.7% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
4x 2.2 GHz & 8x 1.6 GHz
CPU base clock speed
4x 2.2 GHz & 8x 1.6 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 4x2.2 GHz & 8x1.6 GHz which is higher than that of 69.9% of processors and equal to that of 0.1% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
10 nm
Semiconductor size
10 nm
This processor uses a 10 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 52.4% of processors and equal to that of 19.1% of processors.
Foundry
Intel 7
Foundry
Intel 7
This processor is built on the Intel 7 foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 66.2% of processors and equal to that of 14.9% of processors.
L3 cache
18 MB
L3 cache
18 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 18 MB which is larger than that of 77.2% of processors and equal to that of 2% of processors.
L2 cache
9 MB
L2 cache
9 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 9 MB which is larger than that of 78% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
L1 cache
1,088 KB
L1 cache
1,088 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 1,088 KB which is larger than that of 87.6% of processors and equal to that of 0.7% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
?
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 6,400 MHz, which is higher than that of 83.9% of processors and equal to 8.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5X-6400 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5X-6400 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to LPDDR5X-6400 MHz, which is higher than that of 90.2% of processors and equal to 2.6% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
N/A
Maximum memory capacity
96 GB
Maximum memory capacity
96 GB
This processor supports up to 96 GB of memory, which is more than 56% of processors and equal to 5.8% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Integrated GPU model
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
This processor uses the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU integrated GPU, which is more advanced than that in 81.1% of processors and equal to that in 2.9% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
96
Integrated GPU execution units
96
This processor has 96 GPU execution units, which is more than 95% of processors and equal to 4% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
300 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
300 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 300 MHz which is lower than that of 58.1% of processors and equal to that of 37.9% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
JPEG (HW decode/encode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
JPEG (HW decode/encode)
This processor supports JPEG (HW decode/encode) media codecs, which is narrower support than 80.7% of processors and equal to 0.5% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
This processor has a TDP of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.5% of processors and equal to that of 7% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
28 W
Base power (PL1)
28 W
This processor has a base power of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.2% of processors and equal to that of 7.2% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
64 W
Boost power (PL2)
64 W
This processor has a boost power of 64 W which is higher than that of 50.4% of processors and equal to that of 4.2% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
28 seconds
Tau (power duration limit)
28 seconds
This processor has a turbo duration of 28 seconds which is longer than that of 3.4% of processors and equal to that of 86.1% of processors.
Configurable TDP
yes
Configurable TDP
yes
This processor supports configurable TDP. 47.3% of processors support configurable TDP.
cTDP: 20 W
Show more

Intel Core i7 1360P vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • 2.1x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    10,125
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,125 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,125 vs 4,829
  • 6 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    12
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • 67% higher single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    2,457
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,457 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,457 vs 1,471
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Raptor Lake
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raptor Lake vs Kaby Lake).
    Raptor Lake vs Kaby Lake
  • 8 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    16
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • 16.3% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    5.0 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    5.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 74.8% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    18,481
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (18,481 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    18,481 vs 10,572.5
  • 37.4% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,434
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,434 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,434 vs 2,500
  • 19% better value for money
    Intel Core i7 1360P has better value for money than the average processor (7.81 vs 6.6).
    7.81 vs 6.56
  • Advanced security extensions
    Security extensions
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TDT
    This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TDT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TDT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
  • Includes crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES, VAES, SHA, PCLMULQDQ
    This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES, VAES, SHA, PCLMULQDQ vs AES, SHA
  • Broader instruction support
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, VAES, BMI1, BMI2
    This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, VAES, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, VAES, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2023 vs 2020).
    January 2023
    2023 vs 2020
  • Supports HMP
    Uses HMP
    yes
    This processor supports HMP, the average processor does not. 22.7% of processors support HMP.
  • 2.1x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    10,125
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,125 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,125 vs 4,829
  • 6 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    12
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • 67% higher single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    2,457
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,457 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,457 vs 1,471
  • 8 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    16
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • 16.3% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    5.0 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    5.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 74.8% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    18,481
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (18,481 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    18,481 vs 10,572.5
  • 37.4% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,434
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,434 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,434 vs 2,500
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 2.2 GHz & 8 x 1.6 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (4x2.2 GHz & 8x1.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    4x2.2 GHz & 8x1.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 2 wider front-end design
    Front-end width
    6
    This processor has a higher front-end width than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
    P-core 6, E-core 6
    6 vs 4
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Raptor Lake
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raptor Lake vs Kaby Lake).
    Raptor Lake vs Kaby Lake
  • 2.5x more L2 per core
    L2 per core
    1.25 MB/core
    This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    E-core cluster: 1.25 MB shared
    1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 3.6x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    9 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (9 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    9 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • Uses big.LITTLE design
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    yes
    This processor uses a big.LITTLE design, the average processor does not. 20.5% of processors use a big.LITTLE design.
  • 2.83x larger L1 cache
    L1 cache
    1,088 KB
    This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (1088 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    1,088 KB vs 384 KB
  • 2.25x larger L3 cache
    L3 cache
    18 MB
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (18 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    18 MB vs 8 MB
  • More advanced foundry
    Foundry
    Intel 7
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm).
    Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    Semiconductor size
    10 nm
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    10 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2.18x higher memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    6,400 MHz
    This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (6400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCIe version
    4.0
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • 4 more PCIe lanes
    PCIe lane count
    20
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (20 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    20 vs 16
  • Higher JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    LPDDR5X-6400 MHz
    This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5X-6400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    LPDDR5X-6400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 50% more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    96 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (96 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    96 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4x more GPU execution units
    Integrated GPU execution units
    96
    This processor has more GPU execution units than the average processor (96 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
    96 vs 24
  • Better integrated GPU
    Integrated GPU model
    Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
    This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
    Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 1 more supported displays
    Maximum supported displays
    4
    This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
    4 vs 3
  • 37.8% lower base power
    Base power (PL1)
    28 W
    This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • 37.8% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    28 W
    This processor has a lower TDP than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • Narrower media codec support
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    JPEG (HW decode/encode)
    This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (JPEG (HW decode/encode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
    JPEG (HW decode/encode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
  • 12.5% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.5 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 50% lower bus transfer rate
    Bus transfer rate
    4 GT/s
    This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
    4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
  • 68% more expensive
    Intel Core i7 1360P is more expensive than the average processor (£420 vs £250).
    £420 vs £250
  • Older CPU socket
    CPU socket
    FCBGA1744
    This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1744 vs FP4).
    FCBGA1744 vs FP4
  • Limited PCIe bifurcation
    PCIe bifurcation modes
    x16, x8/x8
    This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
    x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4
  • 6 lower clock multiplier
    Clock multiplier
    22
    This processor has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (22 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
    22 vs 28
  • 1.7% larger die size
    Die size
    180 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (180 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    180 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 68% more expensive
    Intel Core i7 1360P is more expensive than the average processor (£420 vs £250).
    £420 vs £250
  • Older CPU socket
    CPU socket
    FCBGA1744
    This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1744 vs FP4).
    FCBGA1744 vs FP4
  • 50% lower bus transfer rate
    Bus transfer rate
    4 GT/s
    This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
    4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
  • 6 lower clock multiplier
    Clock multiplier
    22
    This processor has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (22 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
    22 vs 28
  • 12.5% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.5 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 1.7% larger die size
    Die size
    180 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (180 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    180 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • Limited PCIe bifurcation
    PCIe bifurcation modes
    x16, x8/x8
    This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
    x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4
  • Narrower media codec support
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    JPEG (HW decode/encode)
    This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (JPEG (HW decode/encode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
    JPEG (HW decode/encode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
laptopmedia.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
B
bm.hardlimit.com
01/01/2023
Summary of the review
O
openbenchmarking.org
Q3 2023
Summary of the review
E
en.overclocking.com
21/05/2023
Summary of the review
C
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Q1 2023
Summary of the review
S
servethehome.com
01/05/2023
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/01/2023
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
19/04/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
30/01/2023
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
01/07/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclocking.com
19/05/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
31/01/2023
Summary of the review
R
ratake.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
24/06/2023
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
09/03/2023
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
30/11/2023
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
24/11/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
17/07/2023
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
03/04/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
31/01/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Intel Core i7 1360P

  • High performance for multitasking, coding, and general office automation
  • Strong single-threaded performance beneficial for gaming and emulators
  • Significant 20% faster integrated graphics (96 EU) compared to i5 counterparts
  • Balanced performance-to-battery ratio for an ultra-portable 'P' series chip
  • Supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexible upgrade paths

What we don't like about Intel Core i7 1360P

  • Prone to thermal throttling and loud fan noise under heavy or sustained loads
  • Hefty price premium compared to the i5-1340P for only incremental performance gains
  • Power consumption can spike significantly (up to 100W) during demanding tasks
  • Performance is heavily limited by the laptop's cooling solution and chassis design
  • Battery life is generally shorter than the more efficient 'U' series processors

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1360P is a high-end 13th Gen Raptor Lake mobile processor featuring 12 cores (4 Performance-cores and 8 Efficient-cores) and 16 threads, with a max turbo frequency of 5.00 GHz and 18 MB of Smart Cache. Designed for thin-and-light laptops, it operates at a 28W base power (scaling up to 64W) and includes integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics with 96 execution units. Its primary strengths include strong single-core performance for productivity, efficient multitasking via its hybrid architecture, and support for modern standards like DDR5-5200 RAM and PCIe 4.0. However, cons include high power consumption and heat under heavy load, limited PCIe lanes (x8 for GPU), and performance that can be heavily throttled by the cooling solutions of ultra-thin laptop designs.

Compare Intel Core i7 1360P with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 1360P and other processors

No results found