Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Intel Core i5 8400 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160PassMark benchmark result:9230N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.0 GHzCPU socket:LGA1151TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

Intel Core i5 8400 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

9.4

User score

▼Worse than 56% of processors
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

4.2

Performance

18%

4.9

Cache & Architecture

10%

5.9

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.9

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

7.0

Integrated Graphics

▼Worse than 62% of processors
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,956 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 95% of processors
  • intel-core-i5-8400
  • intel-core-i5-8400
  • intel-core-i5-8400
  • intel-core-i5-8400
  • intel-core-i5-8400
intel-core-i5-8400
intel-core-i5-8400
intel-core-i5-8400
intel-core-i5-8400
intel-core-i5-8400

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i5 8400

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.2

Performance

18%

4.9

Cache & Architecture

10%

5.9

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.9

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

7.0

Integrated Graphics

4.9
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,956 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel Core i5 8400 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

6.6
Brand name
Intel
Processor type
desktop
Processor type
desktop
This processor belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 56% of processors and equal to that of 37.9% of processors.
CPU socket
LGA1151
CPU socket
LGA1151
This processor uses the LGA1151 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 60.7% of processors and equal to that of 9.4% of processors.
Chipset
Z390, Z370, Q370, H370, B365, B360, H310
Chipset
Z390, Z370, Q370, H370, B365, B360, H310
This processor supports Z390, Z370, Q370, H370, B365, B360, H310 chipsets, which is broader compatibility than 57.2% of processors and equal to that of 4.4% of processors.
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
6
N. of physical cores
6
This processor has 6 CPU cores, which is more than 49.9% of processors and equal to 13.4% of processors.
CPU threads
6
CPU threads
6
This processor offers 6 CPU threads, which is fewer than 64.9% of processors and equal to 2.2% of processors.
Threads per core
1
Threads per core
1
This processor offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.8% of processors and equal to 30.2% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
4 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4 GHz which is lower than that of 59.8% of processors and equal to that of 5.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
6x 2.8 GHz
CPU base clock speed
6x 2.8 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 6x2.8 GHz which is higher than that of 58.8% of processors and equal to that of 0.2% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
14 nm
Semiconductor size
14 nm
This processor uses a 14 nm process node, which is older than that of 50.6% of processors and equal to that of 33.9% of processors.
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
This processor is built on the Intel 14 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 55.2% of processors and equal to that of 29.3% of processors.
L3 cache
9 MB
L3 cache
9 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 9 MB which is larger than that of 51.7% of processors and equal to that of 1.9% of processors.
L2 cache
1.5 MB
L2 cache
1.5 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 1.5 MB which is smaller than that of 62.2% of processors and equal to that of 4.6% of processors.
L1 cache
384 KB
L1 cache
384 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 384 KB which is larger than that of 44.9% of processors and equal to that of 15.7% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4
DDR memory version
DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 26.3% of processors and equal to that of 31.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
2,666 MHz
Maximum memory speed
2,666 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,666 MHz, which is lower than that of 54.7% of processors and equal to 8.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2666 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2666 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-2666 MHz, which is lower than that of 58.3% of processors and equal to 8% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
?
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 61.9% of processors and equal to 21.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Integrated GPU model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
This processor uses the Intel UHD Graphics 630 integrated GPU, which is more advanced than that in 44.3% of processors and equal to that in 8.3% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
23
Integrated GPU execution units
23
This processor has 23 GPU execution units, which is fewer than 50.8% of processors and equal to 0.6% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
350 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
350 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 350 MHz which is higher than that of 42.3% of processors and equal to that of 26.1% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
?
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
65 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
65 W
This processor has a TDP of 65 W which is higher than that of 69.9% of processors and equal to that of 16.3% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
65 W
Base power (PL1)
65 W
This processor has a base power of 65 W which is higher than that of 70.1% of processors and equal to that of 16.7% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
81.25 W
Boost power (PL2)
81.25 W
This processor has a boost power of 81.25 W which is higher than that of 59.8% of processors and equal to that of 0.7% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
?
Configurable TDP
no
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel Core i5 8400 vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2x more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    128 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 10x more popular
    Intel Core i5 8400 is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
    10 vs 1
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i5 8400
    the average processor
    Intel Core i5 8400 has a higher user score than the average processor (9.44 vs 8.000).
    9.44 vs 8
  • Advanced security extensions
    Security extensions
    AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard
    This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
    AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    6 x 2.8 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x2.8 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    6x2.8 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • Modern CPU socket
    CPU socket
    LGA1151
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP4).
    LGA1151 vs FP4
  • 10x more popular
    Intel Core i5 8400 is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
    10 vs 1
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i5 8400
    the average processor
    Intel Core i5 8400 has a higher user score than the average processor (9.44 vs 8.000).
    9.44 vs 8
  • Advanced security extensions
    Security extensions
    AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard
    This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
    AES-NI, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
  • Modern CPU socket
    CPU socket
    LGA1151
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP4).
    LGA1151 vs FP4
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    6 x 2.8 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x2.8 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    6x2.8 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Coffee Lake
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Coffee Lake vs Kaby Lake).
    Coffee Lake vs Kaby Lake
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2x more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    128 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 14.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
    418
    This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (418 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    418 vs 489
  • 50% less L2 per core
    L2 per core
    0.25 MB/core
    This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 44.4% higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    65 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    65 W vs 45 W
  • 7% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.0 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • No crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES
    This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES vs AES, SHA
  • 3 years older release date
    Release date
    2017
    This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
    October 2017
    2017 vs 2020
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 14.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
    418
    This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (418 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    418 vs 489
  • 7% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.0 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    6
    This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (6 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    6 vs 8
  • 17.9% weaker multi-core performance
    Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
    2,291
    This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (2,291 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    2,291 vs 2,791
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Threads per core
    1
    This processor has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
    1 vs 2
  • 12.7% lower PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    9,230
    This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (9,230 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    9,230 vs 10,572.5
  • 5.4% weaker single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    2,366
    This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,366 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    2,366 vs 2,500
  • 6.1% lower single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,382
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,382 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,382 vs 1,471
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 50% less L2 per core
    L2 per core
    0.25 MB/core
    This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 12.5% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.5 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 40% smaller L2 cache
    L2 cache
    1.5 MB
    This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    1.5 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • Lower JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    DDR4-2666 MHz
    This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2666 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    DDR4-2,666 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 9.2% lower memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    41.6 GB/s
    This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (41.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    41.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • 9.1% lower memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    2,666 MHz
    This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2666 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    2,666 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 44.4% higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    65 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    65 W vs 45 W
  • 44.4% higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    65 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    65 W vs 45 W
  • 35.4% higher boost power
    Boost power (PL2)
    81.25 W
    This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (81.3 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
    81.25 W vs 60 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
discover.hubpages.com
08/11/2017
Summary of the review
P
phoronix.com
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
06/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcgamesn.com
22/01/2019
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
13/10/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
25/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
06/10/2017
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
04/07/2019
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardware-mag.de
25/06/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
13/02/2018
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
24/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
30/10/2017
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
12/04/2018
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/10/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
25/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
27/10/2017
Summary of the review
C
capa9.net
18/08/2018
Summary of the review
M
muycomputer.com
14/10/2017
Summary of the review
G
geektopia.es
19/10/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
26/10/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
20/07/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,956 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Intel Core i5 8400

  • Excellent gaming performance for its price point, often rivaling previous-generation i7 flagship processors
  • First mainstream i5 to feature six physical cores, providing a significant multi-threaded boost over older quad-core models
  • Highly power-efficient with a low 65W TDP, making it easy to cool even in smaller builds
  • Includes a stock thermal cooler in the box, saving users from additional immediate costs
  • Strong single-core performance that benefits older applications and many modern games

What we don't like about Intel Core i5 8400

  • Locked multiplier means the processor cannot be overclocked for extra performance
  • Lack of Hyper-Threading (6 cores/6 threads) puts it at a disadvantage in heavy multi-tasking compared to Ryzen competitors
  • Requires a 300-series motherboard, lacking backward compatibility with older LGA 1151 (100/200 series) boards
  • Relatively low base clock speed of 2.8GHz, though it does boost higher under load
  • The included stock cooler can be loud and less effective under sustained heavy workloads

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-8400 is a mid-range 8th-generation 'Coffee Lake' processor featuring 6 cores and 6 threads with a 65W TDP. It operates at a base frequency of 2.80 GHz, reaching a max turbo boost of 4.00 GHz, and includes 9 MB of Intel Smart Cache and integrated UHD Graphics 630. Main pros include a significant 50% core count increase over its predecessor, strong gaming performance that rivals previous-gen i7 chips, and high power efficiency. However, it lacks Hyper-Threading, has a locked multiplier that prevents traditional overclocking, and requires a 300-series motherboard due to a lack of backward compatibility with older LGA 1151 sockets.

Compare Intel Core i5 8400 with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i5 8400 and other processors

No results found