Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Intel Core i5 7500 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180PassMark benchmark result:6035N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:3.8 GHzCPU socket:LGA1151TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

Intel Core i5 7500 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

9.4

User score

▼Worse than 57% of processors
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

4.2

Performance

18%

4.8

Cache & Architecture

10%

5.2

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.9

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

6.6

Integrated Graphics

▼Worse than 64% of processors
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,582 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 93% of processors
  • intel-core-i5-7500
  • intel-core-i5-7500
  • intel-core-i5-7500
intel-core-i5-7500
intel-core-i5-7500
intel-core-i5-7500

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i5 7500

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.2

Performance

18%

4.8

Cache & Architecture

10%

5.2

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.9

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

6.6

Integrated Graphics

4.7
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,582 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel Core i5 7500 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.2

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

6.5
Brand name
Intel
Processor type
desktop
Processor type
desktop
This processor belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 56% of processors and equal to that of 37.9% of processors.
CPU socket
LGA1151
CPU socket
LGA1151
This processor uses the LGA1151 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 60.7% of processors and equal to that of 9.4% of processors.
Chipset
?
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
4
N. of physical cores
4
This processor has 4 CPU cores, which is fewer than 50.7% of processors and equal to 28.5% of processors.
CPU threads
4
CPU threads
4
This processor offers 4 CPU threads, which is fewer than 67.4% of processors and equal to 26.5% of processors.
Threads per core
1
Threads per core
1
This processor offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.8% of processors and equal to 30.2% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
3.8 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
3.8 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 3.8 GHz which is lower than that of 68.5% of processors and equal to that of 4.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
4x 3.4 GHz
CPU base clock speed
4x 3.4 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 4x3.4 GHz which is lower than that of 52% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
14 nm
Semiconductor size
14 nm
This processor uses a 14 nm process node, which is older than that of 50.6% of processors and equal to that of 33.9% of processors.
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
Foundry
Intel 14 nm
This processor is built on the Intel 14 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 55.2% of processors and equal to that of 29.3% of processors.
L3 cache
6 MB
L3 cache
6 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 6 MB which is smaller than that of 60.4% of processors and equal to that of 9.7% of processors.
L2 cache
1 MB
L2 cache
1 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 1 MB which is smaller than that of 66.9% of processors and equal to that of 17.7% of processors.
L1 cache
256 KB
L1 cache
256 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 256 KB which is smaller than that of 59.4% of processors and equal to that of 18.6% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR3L/DDR4
DDR memory version
DDR3L/DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR3L/DDR4, which is older than that of 77.7% of processors and equal to that of 5.4% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
2,400 MHz
Maximum memory speed
2,400 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,400 MHz, which is lower than that of 63% of processors and equal to 12.4% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2400 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2400 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-2400 MHz, which is lower than that of 66.4% of processors and equal to 11.5% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,400 MHz
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
2,400 MHz
This processor supports XMP/EXPO memory speeds up to 2,400 MHz, which is higher than that of 88.7% of processors and equal to 0.5% of processors.
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
This processor supports up to 64 GB of memory, which is more than 28.4% of processors and equal to 27.5% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
Intel HD Graphics 630
Integrated GPU model
Intel HD Graphics 630
This processor uses the Intel HD Graphics 630 integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 73.9% of processors and equal to that in 2.9% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
24
Integrated GPU execution units
24
This processor has 24 GPU execution units, which is more than 49.3% of processors and equal to 21.5% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
350 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
350 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 350 MHz which is higher than that of 42.3% of processors and equal to that of 26.1% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode)
This processor supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode) media codecs, which is broader support than 56.2% of processors and equal to 9.5% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
65 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
65 W
This processor has a TDP of 65 W which is higher than that of 69.9% of processors and equal to that of 16.3% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
65 W
Base power (PL1)
65 W
This processor has a base power of 65 W which is higher than that of 70.1% of processors and equal to that of 16.7% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
8 seconds
Tau (power duration limit)
8 seconds
This processor has a turbo duration of 8 seconds which is longer than that of 89.9% of processors and equal to that of 7% of processors.
Configurable TDP
no
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel Core i5 7500 vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 37.3% smaller die size
    Die size
    111 mm²
    This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (111 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    111 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 10x more popular
    Intel Core i5 7500 is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
    10 vs 1
  • Advanced security extensions
    Security extensions
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard
    This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
  • 17.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i5 7500
    the average processor
    Intel Core i5 7500 has a higher user score than the average processor (9.40 vs 8.000).
    9.4 vs 8
  • Modern CPU socket
    CPU socket
    LGA1151
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP4).
    LGA1151 vs FP4
  • 10x more popular
    Intel Core i5 7500 is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
    10 vs 1
  • 17.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel Core i5 7500
    the average processor
    Intel Core i5 7500 has a higher user score than the average processor (9.40 vs 8.000).
    9.4 vs 8
  • Advanced security extensions
    Security extensions
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard
    This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
    AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
  • Modern CPU socket
    CPU socket
    LGA1151
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP4).
    LGA1151 vs FP4
  • 37.3% smaller die size
    Die size
    111 mm²
    This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (111 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    111 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • Supports memory overclocking
    Memory overclocking
    yes
    This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • Includes stock cooler
    Cooler included
    yes
    This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    4 vs 6
  • 42.9% lower PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    6,035
    This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (6,035 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    6,035 vs 10,572.5
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 11.6% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.8 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • No crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES
    This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES vs AES, SHA
  • 3 years older release date
    Release date
    2017
    This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
    January 2017
    2017 vs 2020
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    4 vs 6
  • 42.9% lower PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    6,035
    This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (6,035 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    6,035 vs 10,572.5
  • 11.6% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.8 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 26.8% lower multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    3,534
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (3,534 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    3,534 vs 4,829
  • 10.2% weaker single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    2,246
    This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,246 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    2,246 vs 2,500
  • 12.8% lower single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,283
    This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,283 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,283 vs 1,471
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Threads per core
    1
    This processor has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
    1 vs 2
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    14 nm
    This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    14 nm vs 12 nm
  • 50% less L2 per core
    L2 per core
    0.25 MB/core
    This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 60% smaller L2 cache
    L2 cache
    1 MB
    This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    1 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • 12.5% less L3 per core
    L3 per core
    1.5 MB/core
    This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 33.3% smaller L1 cache
    L1 cache
    256 KB
    This processor has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    256 KB vs 384 KB
  • 25% smaller L3 cache
    L3 cache
    6 MB
    This processor has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (6 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    6 MB vs 8 MB
  • Older DDR support
    DDR memory version
    DDR3L/DDR4
    This processor supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3L/DDR4 vs DDR4).
    DDR3L/DDR4 vs DDR4
  • Lower JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    DDR4-2400 MHz
    This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    DDR4-2,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 18.2% lower memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    2,400 MHz
    This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • 16.2% lower memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    38.4 GB/s
    This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (38.4 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    38.4 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • Narrower media codec support
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode)
    This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
    H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
  • Inferior integrated GPU
    Integrated GPU model
    Intel HD Graphics 630
    This processor uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
    Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 44.4% higher base power
    Base power (PL1)
    65 W
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    65 W vs 45 W
  • 44.4% higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    65 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    65 W vs 45 W
  • 20 seconds shorter turbo duration
    Tau (power duration limit)
    8 seconds
    This processor has a lower turbo duration limit than the average processor (8 seconds vs 28 seconds). The average processor maintains turbo for 28 seconds.
    8 seconds vs 28 seconds

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cpubenchmark.net
29/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
cpu.userbenchmark.com
01/01/2017
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
24/01/2018
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
05/05/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
02/02/2017
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
03/05/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcgameshardware.de
06/02/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/01/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
30/10/2017
Summary of the review
N
nl.hardware.info
11/04/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
03/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
03/01/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,582 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Intel Core i5 7500

  • Reliable gaming performance for 1080p when paired with appropriate mid-range GPUs like the GTX 1060 or RX 580.
  • Highly energy efficient with a 65W TDP, resulting in minimal heat output and low power consumption.
  • Easy to install and typically runs cool even with the included stock cooling fan.
  • Strong value for money as a budget-friendly option for productivity tasks like AutoCAD and multimedia work.
  • Excellent memory bandwidth for a dual-channel processor, offering fast read and write speeds.
  • Significant performance leap for users upgrading from older 4th or 6th generation Intel chips or Pentium models.

What we don't like about Intel Core i5 7500

  • No official support for Windows 11, requiring workarounds to install the latest operating system.
  • Lacks Hyper-Threading (4 cores, 4 threads), which causes high CPU usage and stuttering in modern, CPU-intensive AAA games.
  • Locked multiplier prevents traditional overclocking, limiting the ability to squeeze out extra performance.
  • Prone to significant bottlenecking when paired with modern high-end graphics cards like the RTX 3000 series.
  • Considered 'end of life' by many users in 2024-2026, struggling with heavy multitasking compared to newer 6-core alternatives.
  • Motherboard compatibility is limited to the LGA 1151 socket (specifically 200-series chipsets for full support), making future upgrades difficult without a motherboard swap.

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-7500 is a 7th Generation Kaby Lake desktop processor featuring 4 cores and 4 threads with a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz and a max turbo frequency of 3.8 GHz. Built on a 14nm process, it includes 6MB of Intel Smart Cache, a 65W TDP, and integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 with 4K support at 60Hz. Its main strengths include reliable quad-core performance for general computing, support for both DDR4-2400 and DDR3L-1600 memory up to 64GB, and energy efficiency for standard desktop use. However, it lacks Hyper-Threading, features an unlocked multiplier that prevents traditional overclocking, and is officially incompatible with Windows 11.

Compare Intel Core i5 7500 with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i5 7500 and other processors

No results found