OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i5 1135g7 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£270PassMark benchmark result:9373N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:4.2 GHzCPU socket:FCBGA1449TDP (Thermal design power):28 W

Intel Core i5 1135g7 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

▼Worse than 63% of processors

4.9

▼Worse than 60% of processors

?

4.2
Gaming
Gaming
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
4.8
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
4.8
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
5.5
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.8
L3 cache
8.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
3.4
Video editing
Video editing
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
4.0
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
20.0%
4.4
CPU threads
15.0%
1.8
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices

N/A~ £270

Best rankings

#370inBest mobile CPUs

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i5 1135g7

4.9

Show more

Hide

?

Platform

7.9

Show more

Hide

Brand name

Intel

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

N/A

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

3.9

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

6.6

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

5.0

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.6

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.6

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

Configurable TDP

Show more

Intel Core i5 1135g7 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i5 1135g7 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2.5x more L2 per core
L2 per core
1.25 MB/core
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Tiger Lake
▲ Better than 64% of models
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake
Newer PCIe version
PCIe version
4.0
▲ Better than 62% of models
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4.0 vs 3.0
Broader instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2
★ Better than 93% of models
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
37.8% lower base power
Base power (PL1)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W
2x larger L2 cache
L2 cache
5 MB
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
5 MB vs 2.5 MB
45.5% higher memory speed
Maximum memory speed
4,267 MHz
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4267 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
4,267 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
More advanced foundry
Foundry
Intel 10 nm SuperFin
▲ Better than 54% of models
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).
Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm

Broader instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2
★ Better than 93% of models
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, CLMUL, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
Includes crypto acceleration
Cryptographic acceleration
AES, VAES, SHA
▲ Better than 74% of models
This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA

8.2% higher single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,592
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,592 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,592 vs 1,471

2.5x more L2 per core
L2 per core
1.25 MB/core
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Tiger Lake
▲ Better than 64% of models
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake
2x larger L2 cache
L2 cache
5 MB
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
5 MB vs 2.5 MB
18.6% smaller die size
Die size
144 mm²
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (144 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
144 mm² vs 177 mm²
More advanced foundry
Foundry
Intel 10 nm SuperFin
▲ Better than 54% of models
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).
Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm
16.7% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2 MB/core
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
16.7% smaller process node
Semiconductor size
10 nm
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
10 nm vs 12 nm

Newer PCIe version
PCIe version
4.0
▲ Better than 62% of models
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4.0 vs 3.0
45.5% higher memory speed
Maximum memory speed
4,267 MHz
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4267 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
4,267 MHz vs 2,933 MHz

3.33x more GPU execution units
Integrated GPU execution units
80
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <6 – >64
This processor has more GPU execution units than the average processor (80 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
80 vs 24
Better integrated GPU
Integrated GPU model
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
▲ Better than 79% of models
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
1 more supported displays
Maximum supported displays
4
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

37.8% lower base power
Base power (PL1)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W
37.8% lower TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower TDP than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W

Why is Intel Core i5 1135g7 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
Lower base clock
CPU base clock speed
4 x 0.9 GHz
▼ Worse than 96% of models
This processor has a lower base clock than the average processor (4x0.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
4x0.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
86.6% slower Blender rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
52
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (52 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
52 vs 387.66
83% slower classroom rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
56.94
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (56.9 vs 334.1). The average processor needs 334.1 for the Blender Classroom test.
56.94 vs 334.1
12 fewer PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
4
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (4 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
4 vs 16
33.1% weaker multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
1,868
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <702 – >10.8k
This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,868 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
1,868 vs 2,791
50% lower bus transfer rate
Bus transfer rate
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 GT/s – >19 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
Older CPU socket
CPU socket
FCBGA1449
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1449 vs FP4).
FCBGA1449 vs FP4

6.1% worse value for money
Intel Core i5 1135g7 has worse value for money than the average processor (6.19 vs 6.6).
6.19 vs 6.56

Older CPU socket
CPU socket
FCBGA1449
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1449 vs FP4).
FCBGA1449 vs FP4

2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
Lower base clock
CPU base clock speed
4 x 0.9 GHz
▼ Worse than 96% of models
This processor has a lower base clock than the average processor (4x0.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
4x0.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
86.6% slower Blender rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
52
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (52 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
52 vs 387.66
83% slower classroom rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
56.94
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (56.9 vs 334.1). The average processor needs 334.1 for the Blender Classroom test.
56.94 vs 334.1
33.1% weaker multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
1,868
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <702 – >10.8k
This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,868 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
1,868 vs 2,791
50% lower bus transfer rate
Bus transfer rate
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 GT/s – >19 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
19 lower clock multiplier
Clock multiplier
9
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <16 – >38
This processor has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (9 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
9 vs 28
11.3% lower PassMark score
PassMark benchmark result
9,373
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (9,373 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
9,373 vs 10,572.5
2.3% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
4.2 GHz
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
7% lower multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
4,492
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (4,492 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
4,492 vs 4,829

12 fewer PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
4
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (4 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
4 vs 16

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

cpu.userbenchmark.com

29/03/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Core i5-1135G7 - CPU UserBenchmarks

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a mid-range, quad-core mobile processor with an average 68.3% user benchmark score, suitable for daily productivity and light gaming. Key pros include robust single-core performance exceeding older i7 models, integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics capable of light 1080p gaming, and support for modern PCIe 4.0 and Thunderbolt 4 standards. Conversely, the primary cons involve its 4-core, 8-thread limitation resulting in lower performance in heavy, multi-threaded workloads, alongside thermal constraints in thin chassis that can limit sustained performance. For the full benchmark details, visit UserBenchmark.

laptopmedia.com

12/09/2020

Summary of the review

[Comparison] Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Core i5-1035G7 - LaptopMedia

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Tiger Lake) provides a roughly 13% CPU performance increase over the Core i5-1035G7 (Ice Lake) in tests like Cinebench R15, driven by higher base (2.40 GHz) and boost (4.20 GHz) frequencies. While this offers improved productivity, the performance gain is considered evolutionary rather than revolutionary, making it a modest upgrade for current Ice Lake users. Surprisingly, the older Iris Plus Graphics G7 in the i5-1035G7 outperformed the new Iris Xe in this preliminary review by 13%, marking a significant disadvantage for the new platform. For the full, detailed comparison, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

07/01/2021

Summary of the review

The Core i5-1135G7 is about 20% better across all of our tests

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Tiger Lake) offers a roughly 20% overall performance advantage over the Core i5-1035G4 (Ice Lake), driven by a 17% increase in 3D rendering speeds and significantly higher base frequencies. The newer processor, featuring 12MB of cache, demonstrates substantial improvements in computational benchmarks and Photoshop tests over the previous generation. Graphics performance shows even wider margins, with the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in the i5-1135G7 outperforming the older i5-1035G4 by 21% in 3DMark Fire Strike and 45% in Unigine Superposition, delivering up to 57% higher frame rates in games like CS:GO. Despite the overall superiority of the i5-1135G7, the i5-1035G4 showed unexpected, higher performance in specific titles like DOTA 2. Pros for the i5-1135G7 include faster core speeds and better memory support, though it can run at higher power levels, while the i5-1035G4's primary advantage remains its lower cost. Overall, the review positions the i5-1135G7 as a superior, more efficient choice for modern, light-gaming laptops. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

07/01/2021

Summary of the review

The Core i5-1135G7 is about 20% better across all of our tests

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Tiger Lake) outperforms the i5-1035G4 (Ice Lake) by approximately 20% in benchmarks, driven by higher clock speeds (up to 4.00 GHz) and a doubled 12MB L3 cache. Performance gains are significant across CPU-intensive tasks and graphics, with the Iris Xe Graphics G7 providing up to 45% better performance in Unigine Superposition, though the older chip sometimes holds an edge in specific, low-setting gaming scenarios. Key pros include superior speed and higher memory support (LPDDR4x-4266MHz), while potential cons involve higher power consumption (up to 25W TDP).

laptopmedia.com

14/06/2022

Summary of the review

[Comparison] Intel Core i3-1215U vs Core i5-1135G7

LaptopMedia compares the Intel Core i3-1215U (Alder Lake) and Core i5-1135G7 (Tiger Lake), finding that the older i5-1135G7 remains a superior choice for sustained performance due to higher base clocks and better thermal management, despite the newer i3-1215U's higher core count. While the i3-1215U boasts up to 20% faster single-core performance and support for faster DDR5-4800 memory, it suffers from performance fluctuations under heavy, long-term loads. Ultimately, the i5-1135G7 outperforms the i3-1215U in most CPU-intensive scenarios, proving that a previous-gen mid-range chip can outperform a modern entry-level option.

laptopmedia.com

30/12/2020

Summary of the review

[Comparison] Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7

LaptopMedia's comparison finds the Intel Core i7-1165G7 superior to the Core i5-1135G7, boasting higher clock speeds (2.80–4.40 GHz vs. 2.40–4.00 GHz) and superior 96 EU Iris Xe graphics. The i7 demonstrates a 31% faster 3D rendering performance and is over 100% faster in synthetic GPU benchmarks, marking a significant performance gap. While the i7 serves as a premium choice for gaming and content creation, the i5 offers a more budget-friendly alternative for tasks not requiring high-end graphics. For the full, detailed comparison, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

24/01/2021

Summary of the review

[Comparison] Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i7-1065G7

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core i5-1135G7 (Tiger Lake) narrowly outperforms the older i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake), offering a 1.4% better 3D rendering performance and a 0.4-second faster Photoshop completion time. The 11th Gen i5 leverages a more efficient 10nm process to deliver superior performance per clock, proving that newer architectures can surpass older, higher-tier silicon. Graphically, the i5-1135G7 dominates with its Iris Xe Graphics G7, winning two of three key tests, making it the superior choice for light gaming and creative tasks compared to the i7's older Iris Plus graphics. The primary advantage of the i5 is its better price-to-performance ratio, delivering superior value in the mid-range laptop market. While both processors are close in competitive benchmarks, a significant disadvantage for the i7-1065G7 is its reliance on a less optimized 10nm node compared to the refined SuperFin process in the i5. The main conclusion is that the Core i5-1135G7 represents a superior, modern, and cost-effective choice for laptop buyers, despite the small margin of victory.

laptopmedia.com

01/04/2021

Summary of the review

All our articles tagged with Core i5-1135G7

The Intel Core i5-1135G7, a 10nm SuperFin, 4-core/8-thread Tiger Lake processor, delivers a significant 17% performance boost in 3D rendering and faster application speeds compared to its i5-1035G4 predecessor. It offers a snappy experience for daily tasks, although it faces stiff competition from AMD Ryzen 5 counterparts in multi-threaded workloads. A major pro is the integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU), which shows a 100% improvement over older solutions, enabling 1080p gaming in titles like CS:GO. However, the processor's reliance on fast system memory can lead to significant performance bottlenecks, as the iGPU lacks dedicated VRAM, making single-channel RAM a disadvantage. While it excels in burst tasks, it can struggle with sustained performance in thin, poorly cooled laptops. Furthermore, it has been largely superseded by 12th Gen Alder Lake CPUs, which offer better efficiency and DDR5 support. For in-depth, detailed specifications and performance comparisons, LaptopMedia provides extensive analysis of the i5-1135G7.

hardwareluxx.de

24/05/2021

Summary of the review

Intel NUC 11 Pro with Core i5-1135G7 Review

The Hardwareluxx review of the Intel NUC 11 Pro (Tiger Canyon) with a Core i5-1135G7 highlights a balanced, compact system designed for professional and office environments. Utilizing 11th Gen architecture, it delivers impressive productivity, 4K streaming, and strong integrated Iris Xe graphics performance in a 4x4-inch form factor. Key advantages include extensive connectivity with dual Thunderbolt ports, 2.5 Gbps Ethernet, and capable, consistent cooling under load. However, the review identifies limitations, specifically the omission of a 3.5mm audio jack, SD card reader, and IR receiver found on consumer models. Additionally, the fan can become audible under high load, and as a barebones kit, it requires extra investment for components like RAM and storage. Overall, it is recommended for users needing high-performance computing in a tiny footprint. Copy

laptopmedia.com

30/12/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7: Performance Comparison

According to a LaptopMedia comparison, the Intel Core i7-1165G7 outperforms the i5-1135G7 in CPU-intensive tasks, delivering a 31% lead in 3D rendering and higher clock speeds. While the i7 offers superior raw performance (pro), it comes at a higher price, whereas the i5 provides better value for general productivity despite trailing in professional creative tasks (con). In graphical benchmarks, the i7's 96EU Iris Xe graphics significantly outperformed the i5's 80EU version, delivering roughly double the frame rates in games like CS:GO. The superior gaming performance is a major pro for the i7, while the limited graphics power of the i5 acts as a con for intensive users. The review concludes the i7-1165G7 is better for future-proofing and high-tier productivity, although the i5-1135G7 remains an capable, cost-effective alternative for daily use.

tomsguide.fr

08/02/2022

Summary of the review

Intel vs. AMD: One will be better for your laptop

Intel's Core Ultra 200 series (Lunar Lake) emphasizes a balance of power and efficiency for AI-focused laptops, offering strong single-threaded performance for responsive, everyday Windows applications. However, a notable disadvantage is that these chips can fall behind in raw multi-threaded workloads and generally offer lower-performing integrated graphics (iGPU) compared to AMD. AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series leads in energy efficiency, allowing for longer battery life during tasks like video playback, and offers superior iGPU performance for casual gaming or creative work. A drawback to the AMD platform is reduced availability compared to the extensive portfolio of Intel-based laptops. Ultimately, Intel is better suited for users prioritizing high-end productivity and single-core speed, whereas AMD is ideal for those needing superior multi-core value and battery life. While both brands offer high performance, AMD generally delivers better value-per-dollar, and Intel provides specialized AI features within the Windows ecosystem.

hardwarecooking.fr

03/03/2022

Summary of the review

Intel NUC 11 Pro NUC11TNKi5 Review: Small but Mighty?

The HardwareCooking review of the Intel NUC 11 Pro (NUC11TNKi5) highlights a compact, matte-black "Slim" chassis ideal for professional, space-constrained environments. It features an Intel Core i5-1135G7 processor with Iris Xe graphics, providing "peppy" performance for office tasks, digital signage, and productivity work. Key advantages include exceptional connectivity with dual Thunderbolt and dual HDMI ports, alongside efficient thermal management that maintains stable clock speeds, though it is not designed for heavy gaming or intensive video editing.

tomshardware.fr

07/02/2022

Summary of the review

AMD vs Intel: 2 identical laptops compared, which CPU to choose?

Tom's Hardware FR compared two Acer Swift 3 laptops featuring the Intel Core i5-1135G7 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, finding that Intel's 10nm quad-core chip excels in single-core tasks and Iris Xe graphics, while AMD's 7nm six-core Lucienne processor, based on Zen 2, delivers superior multi-threaded efficiency at lower power. Intel's pros include better GPU-accelerated performance and higher memory bandwidth, but its 28W TDP can lead to higher power usage compared to AMD's efficient 15W operation. While the AMD system excels in sustained productivity tasks, the Intel configuration is generally better for casual gaming on integrated graphics. Ultimately, the review identifies Intel as the choice for graphics-focused users and AMD for those prioritizing multi-core performance, though the older Zen 2 architecture limits AMD's single-core capabilities in this comparison. Tom’s HardwareFor the full, detailed review, visit Tom's Hardware FR.

laptopmedia.com

11/01/2021

Summary of the review

All our articles tagged core i5-1135g7 | LaptopMedia

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a highly popular 10nm Tiger Lake processor featuring 4 cores and 8 threads, offering reliable, efficient performance for everyday tasks that often surpasses older 10th Gen chips in both computing and integrated graphics. Key strengths include superior Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) performance—approximately 20% faster than predecessors—and excellent battery efficiency, making it a best-seller in notebooks like the ASUS Vivobook 15 OLED. However, the 4-core configuration limits the i5-1135G7 in heavy multi-core tasks compared to 6-core alternatives like the AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, and its performance depends heavily on fast dual-channel RAM. Additionally, the processor can produce high temperatures in thin-and-light designs and struggles to compete with newer 12th Gen Alder Lake successors in sustained heavy workloads.

laptopmedia.com

14/09/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i5-1135G7 - Specs, Benchmarks, and Laptops

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a 10nm Tiger Lake-UP3 mid-range processor featuring four cores, eight threads, and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7, offering a 20% performance boost over its predecessor. It excels in single-core tasks like Photoshop and enables entry-level gaming, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops. However, performance is heavily dependent on fast dual-channel RAM, and the chip is prone to thermal throttling under load, often lagging behind AMD rivals in multi-core tasks. For more details, visit LaptopMedia. Copy

laptopmedia.com

22/10/2026

Summary of the review

All our articles tagged Intel Core i5-1135G7

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a highly successful 4-core/8-thread Tiger Lake processor offering a 20% overall performance boost over its predecessor, specializing in snappier single-core tasks. Its integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) delivers a significant 45% advantage in benchmarks over older models, enabling entry-level gaming and improved creative productivity. While offering versatile TDP settings from 12W to 28W, the chip is limited in heavy, multi-threaded workloads compared to AMD competitors and requires robust cooling. Pros: Strong Integrated Graphics: The Iris Xe Graphics G7 handles 1080p gaming on low/medium settings.High Single-Core Responsiveness: Excellent for office applications and daily tasks.AV1 Decoding & Display Support: Modern hardware support for high-resolution displays. Cons: Limited Multi-Core Power: Trails AMD Ryzen chips in heavy video editing.Thermal Management: Not suitable for fanless designs due to cooling requirements.RAM Speed Dependence: Graphics performance is heavily reliant on fast system memory. For the detailed specifications and full review, visit LaptopMedia.

tweakers.net

29/06/2021

Summary of the review

Mini PCs with Core i5-1135G7 - Is the original Intel NUC still the best?

This Tweakers review compares four Intel Core i5-1135G7-powered mini-PCs, finding that while competitors like Minisforum and ASRock offer value, the official Intel NUC 11 retains the benchmark for ultra-compact, high-connectivity design. The NUC 11 shines with its superior build quality, Thunderbolt 4 support, and efficient cooling, though it faces stiff competition on price from the larger, value-oriented Minisforum TL50. Despite strong performance from the 11th Gen chip, the review notes that newer 12th/13th Gen models offer superior multi-core performance, making the NUC 11 best for those prioritizing form factor over top-tier processing power.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Intel Core i5 1135g7

Excellent value for money in mid-range laptops
Snappy performance for daily multitasking and office work
Strong integrated Iris Xe graphics for casual gaming and video editing
Power efficient, contributing to longer laptop battery life
Stays relatively cool during standard productivity tasks
Supports high-speed RAM (up to LPDDR4x-4266) which boosts iGPU performance

What we don't like about Intel Core i5 1135g7

Quad-core design can struggle with heavy professional workloads compared to newer 12th/13th gen or Ryzen chips
Noticeable performance throttling in laptops with poor cooling solutions
Integrated graphics performance is heavily dependent on having fast, dual-channel RAM
Struggles with modern AAA games at resolutions higher than 720p/low settings
Graphics drivers can occasionally be unstable compared to dedicated GPU alternatives

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is an 11th Gen Tiger Lake-U quad-core processor featuring 8 threads, an 8MB Smart Cache, and a configurable TDP of 12W to 28W. It operates at a base frequency of 2.40 GHz with a max turbo boost of up to 4.20 GHz, and is built on a 10nm SuperFin process for improved energy efficiency. A key advantage is its integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80 execution units) which offers decent performance for light gaming and 4K video playback, alongside support for modern standards like PCIe 4.0 and Thunderbolt 4. However, it is limited by having only 4 cores, making it less competitive for heavy multi-threaded workloads compared to newer generations or high-core-count rivals, and it lacks an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9955WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i5 1135g7 with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i5 1135g7 and other processors

No results found